User talk:Amusecuiop

Amusecuiop, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Amusecuiop! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Bulgaria is not Israel

Hi, I see that you recently made added the page History of the Jews in Bulgaria to the "Israel portal", which is inappropriate. I'm reverting that edit, but if you want to discuss that, it's fine (see WP:BRD). If you think it over, I hope you'll come to agree. —Boruch Baum (talk) 21:18, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Bulgaria follow-up

So, it looks like I've tired myself out for today, but have accomplished some good on the page History of the Jews in Bulgaria. I did receive your 'thank you's - you're quite welcome; it's always nice to get some feedback. Should you be so motivated and able, there were two references in the footnotes (numbers 4 & 5) whose text is in some Cyrillic language (the obvious candidate being Bulgarian) I don't understand. I passed on attempting to document those citations, so if you're able and willing, that task remains outstanding. Also, there was at least two dead links being cited; one I tagged, the other I overloked. Best. —Boruch Baum (talk) 23:51, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Messing up the page History of the Jews in Bulgaria

Do you see the destructive consequences of your edits upon the page? Look at the references section, and see the havoc you have caused because you don't know how to properly write a reference citation. Specifically, references #2 and #6 appear improperly there, and the page generates two "Cite Error"s that you can see at the bottom of the reference section. Please learn how to cite; In the past, I spent time cleaning up after you, but I would appreciate it if you would invest the short amount of time to learn how to perform the edit. After you perform the edit, preview it befor saving, in order to verify that you haven't generated any errors. —Boruch Baum (talk) 00:26, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Boruch Baum - Excuse me but why you put the blame on? I have nothing to do with the "destructive consequences". Please clarify what exactly wrong was done by me. Amusecuiop (talk) 01:41, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

@Amusecuiop: - Okay. In response, I went back and double-checked, and it looks like you are 100% correct, and I am 100% wrong. So, I apologize - it was the one or more anonymous IP editors that were changing the page at about the same time as you. Really, I'm sorry - I don't know how I made that mistake. BTW - no need to also post to my talk page if you use the {{reply to}} template, like I just did at the beginning of my response. That way has the added advantage of keeping the conversation in one place.

@Boruch Baum: - Thanks for your reply. I appreciated. (including the suggestion for the use of "reply to template"). Have a good day/night. Amusecuiop (talk) 23:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Mentioned at WP:AN3. Consider participating in discussions

Hello Amusecuiop. Your name was mentioned at WP:AN3#User:149.62.200.251, User:212.5.158.50, User:149.62.200.33, User:149.62.200.79 reported by User:Boruch Baum (Result: Semi). Though you haven't been sanctioned, I have to point out that the article talk page is available for your use. While editing the article 30 times, so far you've never posted on the talk page, and you've never replied to anyone who left messages on your own user talk. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:38, 4 October 2015 (UTC)