User talk:An anonymous username, not my real name/Archives/2022/December
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your GA nomination of White-lipped peccary
The article White-lipped peccary you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:White-lipped peccary for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 10:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Japanese fire-bellied newt
On 2 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Japanese fire-bellied newt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Japanese fire-bellied newt has a toxin that blocks sodium channels in most vertebrates? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Japanese fire-bellied newt. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Japanese fire-bellied newt), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Baeoentedon bouceki
On 3 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Baeoentedon bouceki, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although Baeoentedon bouceki was collected from China in 1983, it was not formally described as a new species until 2014? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Baeoentedon bouceki. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Baeoentedon bouceki), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Persea palustris GAN
Hi whoever you are! :) I am in a GA review groove and could pick this plant species article up right away if you would be okay with possible periodic interruptions in the next week to two weeks while I intersperse my work with another GA I'm reviewing as well as a FL I'm helping to review. It's been awhile since I reviewed anything, and I like to grab a plants species article when available. I'm detailed. Is this your first plants GAN? – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 23:07, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- I don't have any problem with waiting, and yes, this is my first plant GAN. I'm glad to see your enthusiasm :) An anonymous username, not my real name 23:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm enthused. :) I think it's good for a Plants Project member to review GAs and FAs that are of interest to that project. Have you looked at the Plants Project? There is a Taxon template that's worth studying. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 00:27, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I looked at that. I tried to base the article on it, although there were a few parts I couldn't find information on. An anonymous username, not my real name 00:32, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm enthused. :) I think it's good for a Plants Project member to review GAs and FAs that are of interest to that project. Have you looked at the Plants Project? There is a Taxon template that's worth studying. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 00:27, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Persea palustris
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Persea palustris you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Eewilson -- Eewilson (talk) 04:01, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the clear and actionable feedback. I'll work on this later this week. Would you be OK to number your feedback to make it easier for me to document the action I took in reply to them? Or permit me to edit your comment to make the bullets numbers? CT55555(talk) 19:19, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- I can number it for you now. Good luck! An anonymous username, not my real name 19:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Battle of Malacca (1641)
On 23 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Malacca (1641), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite losing almost one thousand men capturing Malacca in 1641, the Dutch East India Company did not invest much time or energy into it afterward? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Malacca (1641). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Battle of Malacca (1641)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Inyo shrew
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Inyo shrew you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 15:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Idaho pocket gopher
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Idaho pocket gopher you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 15:02, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Prince Bernhard's titi monkey
On 27 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Prince Bernhard's titi monkey, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Prince Bernhard's titi monkey is known locally as zog-zog? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Prince Bernhard's titi monkey. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Prince Bernhard's titi monkey), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.