User talk:Anarchyte/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:08, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Survival Island 3 - Australia Story, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Under construction tag
I have been reading Wikipedia for a decade or more, editing for about a year now, and I have never seen that "New Page" tag before. Appreciate the heads up about it, and I hope to have Dark Lord in serviceable condition in relatively short order! ErdrickLoto (talk) 06:33, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- No problem, sorry about rushing it to PROD, I forgot to check the history where you wrote "Will fill in with more information shortly". Anarchyte 06:37, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Honestly, if the draft isn't even going to link its expected sources, it's best incubated in draftspace or userspace (out of mainspace). czar 10:08, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, if you want to add AfD discussions to Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Video games, please follow the instructions at the top of the page - namely, step #2 under the Adding a new AfD discussion section. Cheers, ansh666 05:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Survival Island 3 at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 00:38, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Please do not delete Minecraft clone If you do, tell me on my talk page
Please do not delete Minecraft clone If you do, tell me on User talk:MML Master-96.229.20.84 (talk) 00:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- @MML Master and 96.229.20.84: The article isn't notable per the general notability guidelines. Please read WP:N (video games) if you want to make video-game related articles. Anarchyte 05:37, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi Anarchyte I'm EDMultra7 I just wondering if you put a Speedy Deletion in the article about Fabric Live Because the album was already Released during then. I type the reason on the talk page. Can You Redirect this article please? (talk) 10:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi @EDMultra7: I redirected that page and a few others because the the person whom was listed as the artist did not have an article. Per WP:A9 and WP:NMUSIC, the album artist must have an article. Anarchyte 07:15, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Berek. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, White Rim Road, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Berek (talk) 12:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I rolled your last edit back as vandalism, when I think we simply had an edit conflict. Poor article is being pounded right now. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 11:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- And now we are having edit conflicts while discussing edit conflicts. You're welcome, and keep fighting the good fight. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 11:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
MED
Hello, MED is trademark pending for Medical Equipment Dynamics. The term MED should include this information, as it has been widely used in the healthcare industry for many years now. MED is synonymous with Medical Equipment Dynamics througout healthcare specific to the company that sells Medical equipment...similar to GE. MedicalEquipmentDynamics (talk) 04:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- @MedicalEquipmentDynamics: Yes, you said that in your edit summary. I did not revert your second edit, where you add it to the list. I reverted the edit where you changed the lead because it seemed like an advertisement. Anarchyte 04:28, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
11:52:14, 28 January 2016 review of submission by Harold Eban Brown
Good Afternoon,
I am trying to add a page for Harold "Eban" Brown, but you have declined its submission.
Please can you tell me why and what I need to do in order to get this added on to Wikipedia?
Thank you.
- Hi Harold Eban Brown - your draft was declined because it didn't prove notability. Your references aren't reliable and half of them being Wikipedia articles doesn't help (you can't reference Wikipedia in a Wikipedia article. I suggest you read the following things: WP:GNG, WP:N, WP:RS, WP:N (music) and WP:MUSICIAN. Anarchyte 11:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Request on 11:49:14, 28 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by MESA po
Dear Anarchyte,
Thank you very much for reviewing my draft. I would be grateful if you could share with me some helpful tips to improve the references in my article. Thanks!
MESA po (talk) 11:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hello MESA po, your draft was declined because I felt the references provided weren't at a high standard. The first reference is fine, but things like the 7th reference aren't very useful for your article because they were published by the corporation in question (if that didn't make sense; a blog post by malERA wouldn't as reliable or useful as a post about malERA by a 3rd party). You may also want to beef up your article a bit. There also, currently, isn't a lead, which is an issue. Anarchyte 11:55, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much for letting me know. Which type of sources would you recommend me? Besides the lead, is there anything else you would suggest in order to strenghten the article?
- I'd recommend reading WP:RS. That'll tell you the reliable source guidelines. Besides the lead, you could add more information throughout the article, as well as a history section (you could probably merge the "Current activities" part into that). Anarchyte 12:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
List of television programs: N being O
A mistake from a sleep-deprived person. --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 03:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Survival Island 3
 | On 30 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Survival Island 3, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that an online petition calling for the removal of Survival Island 3 from Google Play and the App Store had received more than 60,000 signatures as of January 16, 2016? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Survival Island 3. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Hey! Can we reopen Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 January 29#Category:Android video games? (I would base it on Category:Video games by theme, as in Category:Video games about androids.) I don't want to revert your self-close and make a new entry when this exists, but I'm fine with a new one. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 14:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Hellknowz: I don't think you're allowed to reopen it after it's been closed. I'll create a new discussion later (busy atm), or if you wanna make it you can. Anarchyte (work | talk) 23:44, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Done located at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 January 31#Category:Android video games. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
23:54:39, 31 January 2016 review of submission by Pollykul
Can you let me know which parts exactly require more reliable sources? And what kind of sources specifically? I already looked through the reliable sources link on wikipedia and have looked over many similar wiki pages and they have the same kinds of sources, if not less. Thanks!
Pollykul (talk) 23:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'm all for the The Record and The Cambridge Times references, but I'm not so sure about "Building Waterloo Region" and I'm unable to check the reliability at the moment because I'm getting the "Error establishing a database connection" database error when I try to visit any of their pages. Anarchyte (work | talk) 23:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
about cafe24...
Hi, Anarchyte! Just wanted to say thank you for moving my draft! :) Mhl081 (talk) 09:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)mhl081
ZMR Game Page Submission
I have a few questions about the ZMR page you reviewed today. I understand the gamepedia references are not reliable, but most of the information about gameplay actually came from in-game, and I simply used gamepedia's pages as corroboration for the information I already had from poking around in game. Would it be better to remove those references (or perhaps simply remove the gameplay section? The vast majority of references outside that section (not all, but more than 75% I think) came from sources I found using the reliable source google search parameters listed on the reliable video game sources information page here on Wikipedia.
So, just a quick question, really. Would this page get approved without the gameplay section or without the gamepedia references? Thanks. Baraqorn (talk) 18:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- If you found the information yourself, that's original research. Yes, remove the Gamepedia references but I'm not sure if it'll still pass, you might want to talk to Czar. Anarchyte (work | talk) 00:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- So, original research is also a no-no, right? Which is why I corroborated everything in that section with an outside source. Unfortunately, that source is also unreliable according to Wikipedia rules. So would it be better to simply remove the gameplay section? Baraqorn (talk) 19:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, original research is normally a no-no (but it can be tagged with
{{original research}}). Can you check to see if any of your other references (such as the IGN one) contain any info about the gameplay? Try searching for references based on "ZMR" "Zombies/Monsters/Robots" and "Zombies Monsters Robots". If worst comes worst, yes you can remove the section but you could possibly reference the steam store, even though that's a primary link. Anarchyte (work | talk) 23:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC)- I have removed the gamepedia references, added the original research tag to that section and mentioned where the research came from on the Talk page. I resubmitted the page with those changes. Most of the rest of the references were found using the wikipedia video game google template, so I am hopeful they are strong enough to warrant publication. Baraqorn (talk) 18:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, original research is normally a no-no (but it can be tagged with
- So, original research is also a no-no, right? Which is why I corroborated everything in that section with an outside source. Unfortunately, that source is also unreliable according to Wikipedia rules. So would it be better to simply remove the gameplay section? Baraqorn (talk) 19:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
I hope you don't mind, but could you please review these articles for me, when you have the time. The Wilfred Hoare article has been waiting for a while. Many thanks.Gomach (talk) 18:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done I've looked at all the articles, I tagged Hoare with a refimprove section tag. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Many thanks for taking the time to review the articles, very much appreciated. In regard to the refimprove section I have two
- (edit conflict) I wasn't saying the references were bad or unreliable; I added the tag because there are only 2 references used in that area, one of which only being used once, and the other being used all the way up to "af" (and if I can count correctly, that's 30 uses). You can remove the tag if you don't agree with it, by all means. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Your advice and guidance needed
Hello Anarchyte,
Greetings for the day.
I found Location on google earth (Search term: Dhufi Nani Kutch, Gujarat, India) for the article I am trying to create (it is in sandbox).
Kindly let me know will this suffice the requirement of reliable source?
Thanx in advance.
Dhuffiwala (talk) 12:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
DYK for G2A
| On 5 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article G2A, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Riot Games banned G2A from sponsoring teams during the 2015 League of Legends World Championship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/G2A. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
some question about Zeng yanfen
Hello Anarchyte,
I am the editor of the page zeng yanfen. She is an actress of the SNH48,which is an official partner group of Akb48.And We bulid this page with reference of the other members' page such as Mayu Watanabe and Yui Yokoyama.Please don't remove the page of zeng yanfen. We have adjusted the page and added the reference. If there is something else we should do, please text me.
Thanks in advance,
Dxxxhly (talk) 03:50, 6 February 2016 (UTC)dxxxhly
- @Dxxxhly: Hi, if you wish your page to not be deleted, you might want to move it to Draft namespace. Removing CSD templates from your own page is not normally allowed. If you want me to move it to Draft namespace for you, just tell me. If not, the page will probably end up being deleted. Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Ok, please help me to move it to the Draft namespace. Thanks for your help. Dxxxhly (talk) 04:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)dxxxhly
- @Dxxxhly: Done. It is now located at Draft:Zeng Yanfen. You can continue to work on it with basically no fear of it getting deleted. When you're ready to submit it to be reviewed, click the green Submit button. Doing so will enter it in to the queue where you will receive feedback from experienced editors. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey! I thought that we didn't categorize products purely by store, in this case, video games by Steam -- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 November 27#Category:Steam games. I saw it pop up added to some games on my watchlist and was going to CfD as recreation, but wanted to check with you since it's under a different name. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:37, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Also I only now saw your WT:WPVG section. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Someone else CfDed it Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 February 3#Category:Video games on Steam. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry for the late response Hellknowz, I didn't realise we weren't allowed categories on those types of things. If anything, I'd rather make new ones like Category:Video games on steam, Category:Video games on Desura, Category:Video games on Green Man Gaming, Category:Video games on GOG.com, etc. I felt it was useful, so I made it. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
12:58:43, 3 February 2016 review of submission by Dhuffiwala
- Dhuffiwala (talk · contribs)
Hi,
The page I am trying to create very very remote village, having very small amount of population may be 30-40 house. I have not seen any details, news, information or anything else in news papers or magazine for many many years.
Can you please tell me what are the other option?
Note: I got mail reply from government authority for this, will that enough?
rgds Dhuffiwala (talk) 12:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- You should be able to find at least 1 reference for it, even if it's just a mention. At the moment you can't even prove it exists. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Template on the page This Book Loves You
Hi Anarchyte, the page This Book Loves You contained the template under construction when it was first created in my user space, however, it has not even been 2 weeks since it was moved to article namespace. I did not remove the template as there was plenty of content missing from the page. Nevertheless, now that you've removed it, I won't add it again till I decide to make major changes to the page to increase clarity. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rollingcontributor (talk • contribs) 11:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Just to let you know, I do not care even one little bit about this road film where a fellow sets a mission to travel around trying to collect video games. What a waste of life. I do appreciate your striking the inappropriate video game notability standard from your nomination... thanks. But as an admin of Project Film I would like to address the WP:GNG and film notability. All we'd really need is perhaps three decent sources speaking toward a film... and we have dozens. Heck, in a very quick look, I found and used
- International Business Times 28 July 2015
- International Business Times 1 December 2015
- Wired 22 July 2015
- Greensburg Daily News 8 January 2016
- Slash Film 1 October 2015
In the light of WP:NOTCLEANUP, do you really wish to keep the AFD open? Thanks, Schmidt, Michael Q. 02:12, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Howdy again Anarchyte... care to help develop a DYK for the article? What you brought to AFD as a 509 characters (87 words) stub is now a 2003 characters (327 words) C-Class. Still needs some easy expansion, but what'cha think? Schmidt, Michael Q. 08:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- I don't really know how DYK works, MichaelQSchmidt. The whole QPQ thing seems confusing. I have an idea for it though.
- ... that in the documentary film Nintendo Quest, the protagonist is on a quest to acquire all the licensed Nintendo Entertainment System games, within a span of 30 days?
- ... that in Nintendo Quest, the protagonist is on a quest to collect all 678 licensed Nintendo Entertainment System games, within the span of 30 days, without buying any online?
- I have to expand it some first.
. Schmidt, Michael Q. 22:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
2016 GA Cup
 Greetings, all! We would like to announce the start of the 3rd GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Thus far, there have been two GA Cups; both were successful in reaching our goals of significantly reducing the traditionally long queue at GAN, so we're doing it again. Currently, there are over 500 nominations listed and about 450 articles waiting to be reviewed. We hope that we can again make an impact this time. The 3rd GA Cup will begin on March 1, 2016. Four rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on July 31, 2016), but this may change based on participant numbers. There will be slight changes to the scoring system, based upon feedback we've received in the months since GA Cup #2. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same. We're also looking to spice up the competition a bit by running parallel competitions. Finally, there's a possibility of assisting a WikiProject Good Articles backlog drive in the last three weeks of February, before our competition. Please stay tuned for more information as we get it. Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on February 20, 2015. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now! If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges. Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar and MrWooHoo. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Verification
Hi article on t.k.chand has been marked for refimprove could you point out which points are needing verification? All references seem to clarify any points mentioned. Also why has it been tagged with notability ?
Editninja16 (talk) 08:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Editninja16 (talk) 08:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Editninja16: Half the article isn't referenced. The whole honors and bibliography section is unreferenced and half the career section is too. Also, the article reads slightly promotional so you might want to rewrite some of it. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello Anarchyte,
I am not sure why you say half the article isn't referenced while I can see that the referenced mentioned duly point to the facts written. Agreed on the Bibliography and Honor section but not on the rest.
Would mentioning the ISBN be enough for the bibliography? And I'll shortly be putting up the sources for Honors. In addition to this I would like to know why notability is an issue since I can see nearly 132 mainstream media wires covering the person including Reuters, Economic times, Hindu, Times of India, Business Today etc.
I would also like to know which part of the article sounds promotional and would like to improve it, could you please point out?
Editninja16 (talk) 09:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
In-depthish response
@Editninja16: The following sections are unreferenced:
- Early life and education
- Career
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited / Vishakhapatnam Steel Plant
- Central Coalfields
- Bibliography
- Honors
As for the promotional stuff, this is just my opinion and others may disagree:
- He has always been the one to excel in his academics.
- It is astonishing how a management trainee became the director of the same company.
Also, something I just noticed, the line Chand said he has asked his team to simultaneously renegotiate contracts with the aim of reducing 20% in procurement costs, saving Nalco Rs 80-100 crore. Chand also sees an opportunity in leveraging Nalco's mining expertise and plans to convince the board to include mining in its vision plan. has been directly taken from here. You're going to need to change that. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello @Anarchyte:,
I am grateful for your response in helping me out on my first article.
All the points needing referencing will be solved. The lines mentioned as to be promotional will be rephrazed in a neutral point of view. You are right about the directly taken line it'll be removed and rephrazed in own words. I didnot get your response regarding ISBN (if ISBN is enough for the book's reference).
Also Is the notability issue now clear? Could you please remove notability tag? I'll work on the points above and get back to you. Please respond to the questions above. Editninja16 (talk) 10:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- You're free to remove the tag when you deem it fit. And I think the ISBN would be fine, although I might be wrong (don't quote me on this). Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
ArenaCube review
Dear Anarchyte,
Thank you for reviewing my draft. It would be very helpful if you could advise me why the reference do not adequately show the subject's notability and how can i improve them.
The references i have added are from 2 major betting b2b magazines/sites, so they are quite high standard. Especially the one has also a wiki page (the igaming business). Additionally the other one is from ICE TV, the tv network of the biggest betting/technology exhibition ICE Totally Gaming show and lastly from one Greek news site.
Thank you a lot in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by T.kalamakis (talk • contribs) 11:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, as the message on the draft says, you need more references of higher standard. Read WP:RS for more information on how to find reliable sources. You also need to prove notability, which means the article needs to tell us why the company is notable. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Kappak (Game)
Hi Anarchyte,
I believe you recently reviewed my post creation "Kappak (Game)." I'm wondering how to appropriately cite this article?
The source is from the Culture and Heritage of that province in Iran.
However this was spoken, and I'm not sure what academic/ English publishing has been done.
In the future: 1) Can we reference a small WP site than on-references a reliable source? 2) Can we reference publishers that are in an arm of Iran Government (such as Culture and Heritage) which are not Penguin, Oxford (western corporations)? 3) If there is no reliable reference, but the knowledge is common to locals in the area (not disputable), how would we go about referencing this? For example, I'm from a small town in Australia, if it's common knowledge a mountain hike is "approximately 5km between the carpark and Cape Bluff lookout, taking most people 3-5 hours to climb" how would someone reference this? Or if it doesn't need to be referenced, can Joe Bloggs upload this information with links to his WP blog?
Many thanks for your support,
Brad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradrimm (talk • contribs) 12:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Does WP mean Wikipedia, Wordpress or something else? I'm a little confused. Yes you can reference government related sites if they're a reliable source. As for the Joe Bloggs example; no, the reference would not be a reliable source. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Plz what do mean by: English is hard to understand words & sentences or ? thanks --Sunrise2016 (talk) 07:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Sunrise2016:The english in your draft is hard to understand. It isn't grammatically correct and it's worded in such a way that it's hard to read. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi
You added a delete notice. I am here to negotiate you withdrawing it.
You state "Too soon for an article, it currently does not prove notability."
"Too soon" from what? Fallen City was 7 years ago.
Mentions in The Guardian, PC Gamer and Channel 4 Education's website seem fairly notable to me! Chaosdruid (talk) 13:28, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Chaosdruid: I put too soon down because they're still making games (such as Sir you are being Hunted), yet the references provided don't prove notability. Feel free to remove the PROD, that's what they're for.Anarchyte (work | talk) 00:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- K - and thanks for your reasonable response :) Chaosdruid (talk) 12:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Request on 11:21:38, 11 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by 109.150.201.227
Hello
Thank you so much for getting back to me in regards to the copy.
I can assure you all images are mine and owned by myself Mr Johnny Lynch, taken with my own camera, I worked on the film set for 5 weeks and every image I own.
Can you let me know if am doing something wrong please as would like to submit again
Thanks
109.150.201.227 (talk) 11:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- @109.150.201.227: What draft is this? You gave me no link. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Request on 12:54:53, 11 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Drashwinior
- Drashwinior (talk · contribs)
hi. I just wanted to know whether my article is submitted for review or not ? Last modified onno february 9, 2016.
Drashwinior (talk) 12:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Drashwinior: Yes, your article is currently submitted for review. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Draft:TopSpeed.com
Hi there, you mentioned "possibly notable, postponing" on Draft:TopSpeed.com. Would you be able to help me find the right references to get the draft published? I'm just not sure about what type of references I should be searching for.
I noticed, for example, that the publication posted an automotive study/infographic in November that received quite a lot of coverage in the media, from high authority sources such as New York Daily News, Popular Mechanics, Co.Create and others.
Would these references be adequate to support the notability of the publication (I haven't added them yet)?
Many thanks!
WikiAlexandra (talk) 18:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Possibly. Looking at the other references, they seem to be reasonable, with a few being bad (the Apple reference (if you can't find a third-party, that can probably slide) and the primary references from TopSpeed). What it means by postponing is that I felt the article wasn't bad, but the opposite, that it has potential. As for the type of references, you need to find in-depth third party reliable sources that verify the claims. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Got it. I added those references and also created a lead that adequately points out the subject's notability. Regarding those two primary references (the ones that mention the team and the number of visitors per month), I'm not sure I can bypass those, so let me know if those need to be deleted (not sure how to otherwise get the information). Other than that, would you say the draft would be suitable for publishing? Many thanks! WikiAlexandra (talk) 23:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- @WikiAlexandra: I'd say it'd be getting close. After that, try to expand the "About" section. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:54, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Got it. I added those references and also created a lead that adequately points out the subject's notability. Regarding those two primary references (the ones that mention the team and the number of visitors per month), I'm not sure I can bypass those, so let me know if those need to be deleted (not sure how to otherwise get the information). Other than that, would you say the draft would be suitable for publishing? Many thanks! WikiAlexandra (talk) 23:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Request on 11:32:45, 11 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Lynch Johnny
- Lynch Johnny (talk · contribs)
Hello
Thank you so much for getting back to me in regards to the copy.
I can assure you all images are mine and owned by myself Mr Johnny Lynch on the web page , taken with my own camera, I worked on the film set for 5 weeks and every image I own.
I have taken my other pages of line now though which you can check here at the link below
johnnylynchblog.wordpress.com/tag/meet-the-guvnors
Like I said all images are my own which I have now deleted from the other page. The only other information that could be the same is my professional credit list and that is the professional way of formatting them so can't type them up in any other way????
Perhaps you can help me out on this and let me know what am supposed to do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lynch Johnny (talk • contribs) 09:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Can you let me know if am doing something wrong please as would like to submit again
I SENT FIVE OTHER ARTICLES ONE OF WHICH WAS A WIKI PAGE AND HAVE DELETED THE CONTENT ON MY WORD PRESS PAGE WHICH I DIDN"T EXPECT TO BE A PAGE THAT WOULD BE REVIEWED AND SO UNDERSTAND ALREADY THAT YOU WOULDN"T EXCEPT IT. I HAVE DOZENS OF PAGES FROM NEWS GROUPS AND WAS TOLD LAST TIME TO PICK OUT THE BEST AND DID SO AND NOW THIS??? AM AT A COMPLETE LOSS AND HAVE BEEN TRYING FOR OVER A YEAR TO GIVE YOU ALL WHAT YOU WANT AND NOW I CAN'T EVEN FIND THE PAGE I HAVE BUILT AND SUBMITTED. AM NOT VERY TECH SAVVY AND EVERYTHING IS VERY COMPLICATED. CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS IN ENGLISH FOR ME. THANK YOU. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lynch Johnny (talk • contribs) 09:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks
Lynch Johnny (talk) 11:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Lynch Johnny. Your article was deleted because it was a blatant copyright infringement of johnnylynchblog.wordpress.com/tag/meet-the-guvnors. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted work. If you did write the wordpress, please read this page. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Rashid Ajami Page
Hi i have spent time editing the rashid ajami page. I have added references, cited the full discography. It is no longer a copy paste from initial draft but has been built upon. I wanted your opinion on what you feel is missing and what to do to improve it if so? I really feel there are enough references in place now which was the feedback from the initial draft submission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidhollinge (talk • contribs) 10:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Davidhollinge: Hi, I nominated it for AfD because it was originally a copy from the declined draft. Looking at it now, I still don't think it makes the cut. That's why I asked you to work on the draft and resubmit it, instead of editing the mainspace copy. We'll see how the AfD works out. You can request it to be userfied or moved to draft namespace if you wish, although you will need to do that after or during the AfD discussion. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Anarchyte: ok I'm happy to do what is necessary. there are more sources if thats what it needs. Would you be able to help me out with this to get the page up to scratch? I would love your guidance on this!
Need your help, guidance and advice
Hello there,
Greetings for the day.
Kindly note I am trying to create article related to Balrajeshware Mandir (Temple), a religious place in Mulund, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. This temple is 100 years old, and there is a road name on Temple (Balrajeshwar Road) and this temple is situated on Balrajeshwar Road itself only.
I have submitted/resubmitted this article three times and it's been rejected for lack of Reliable Source of reference. I have tried to find many many sources of references, only mange to find Google Map link, Google plus link, two news papers link and two official government links, and one website (wwww.balrajeshwarmahadev.info). These all references have provided in this last edit, mentioned in second table.
Kindly help me to understand would these links reasonable enough to create this article?
Please give your comments and guidance creating this article.
Note: Enclosing / last submitted current article and link details for your ready reference.
Thanx and rgds,
Dhuffiwala (talk) 07:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
| Content |
|---|
| Balrajeshwar Mahadev Mandir (Temple) [1] is dedicated to the Hindu god Shiva, situated in Mulund (West) on the junction of Balrajeshwar Road [2] and Lal Bahadur Shastri Marg [3] next to Keva Fragrances [4]also very near to R-Mall. The Balrajeshwar Mahadev Mandir [5] was established by Late Shri Godhardas Khattau approximately a 100 years ago (this event was celebrated from 22nd September to 24th September 2001).
Every year the festival of Maha Shivratri [6] (the day lord Shiva was married to goddess Parvati) is celebrated on very big scale. Thousands of devotees visit on Maha Shivratri. From 2013 every year 21 ft high ice Shiva Lingam is created for Darśana [7] around Maha Shivratri festival. |
- @Dhuffiwala: Google maps and Google plus are not reliable sources. Remove those sources. I'm not so sure about the other ones. Try contacting Onel5969, the most recent decliner. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanx for reply.
Dhuffiwala (talk) 07:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
hi
Thanks for the message on my talk page that i received upon creating my account. i hope that i can contribute as you have one day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Franco el filth (talk • contribs) 03:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Franco el filth: No problem, if you have any questions don't hesitate to contact me. Also, try doing the Wikipedia Adventure as well as looking at the Teahouse. Last thing, when you leave a message on a talk page, please, at the end of it, put 4 tildes (
~~~~). Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
12:29:39, 15 February 2016 review of submission by Sami P. Lehtonen
Hi. Thank you for rewieving my new article on Swan 48. Since this the second time you find this article is lacking sufficient and verfiable sources I am asking you to be a little more specific of what type of information is still missing. In my opinion the refecences I have provided are verifiable and very thorough too.
Sami
- @Sami P. Lehtonen: Could you please try to use the
<ref name="example">{{cite web|url=here|title=here|date=here|access-date=here|first=here|last=here}}</ref>format? It makes the references easier to read. Anarchyte (work | talk) 21:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
04:46:19, 16 February 2016 review of submission by Pagross
I haven't change the submission for Jeffrey Aronoff yet. I'm wondering if you can tell me exactly what needs better sourcing. I will either get it or delete the statement(s).
Thanks, Patty Grossman
- @Pagross: You need to include in-line citations. Read the links located in the decline message please. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Help on referencing and verify?
What improvements can you recommend to get the bio I wrote about Draft:Dawn Robinson (Executive) approved?
She and her companies had entires in Wikipedia in the past that have disappeared now.
Many of the companies she worked in the past for closed and articles that existed online via trade publications or magazines have been removed as sites have aged, etc. She has had a long standing career and deserves this recognition.
How do I improve referencing to be verifiable when this happens as references develop 404 errors etc?
Your help is appreciated, thank you for your time.
Muzikmuse (talk) 03:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC) Muzikmuse
- Hi Muzikmuse, in order to find out what a good reference is, read WP:RS. That is the reliable source guideline and will tell you everything you need to know. If there's a 404 error/the website is dead, then check sites like web.archive.org and archive.is for old versions of the site. If you use an archived copy, please try to make sure all the info in the article is from the version archived, not a later version which isn't included in the archive. You need to use the references to verify the claims, such as "She has had a long standing career and deserves this recognition"; I have no verification of that at the moment. The article could say she's/she's had <example> but if there's nothing to back it up, everyone is going to take it like a grain of salt. As for their being old Wikipedia articles on the companies and herself, you could try reviving them in your userspace, and if they have references, that would be great. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
HOC Myfitegre
Hello Anarchyte!
My name is Fit and I'm a gamer as well! I run a YouTube channel for a video game called HOC Myfitegre Check it out if you're interested!
Thanks you very much for taking the time to review my extremely novice wikipedia draft submissions. I have never created a wikipedia article for perhaps ten years and it's not at all like i remembered it.
I do apologize if it's frustrating to review my submissions but I can assure you that I'm taking your advice on how to make the article relevant, non salesmanlike in nature, and on point with today's modern writers.
I AM an employee of Andrew Delaplaine and I manage all his web accounts. I used to be his personal assistant but since moving from florida this is no longer a possibility.
All we want to do is properly submit the wikipedia article.
I am going through your notes on the last declination and I will systematically go through them and submit afterwards so as not to waste your time.
I just wanted to introduce myself and make it known that I'm not some anonymous web idiot trying to sell my books on wikipedia!
I love Andrew and he's done a lot of wonderful work so I'm fairly certain he does merit a wikipedia article, definitely not the previous ones i've submitted I'm SORRY.
Any other direct advice that you feel would really help out my work here would be much appreciated! THank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hocmyfitegre (talk • contribs) 18:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Lee Na-ra
Hello! How are you? About my page Lee Nara I put link to her official profile from her company website. So, it suppose to be reliable source or am I wrong? Please give a good reason to reject it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fa79hk (talk • contribs) 13:16, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Fa79hk YouTube and official sites are not reliable third-party sources. That's why it was declined. Anarchyte (work | talk) 23:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
can you give me an example? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fa79hk (talk • contribs) 09:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
How about these? http://www.kpopmusic.com/artist/nara-profile-2 http://ashaphilippines.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html https://kpopinfo114.wordpress.com/2014-rookie-group-debuts/june/asha-profile/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fa79hk (talk • contribs) 09:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Fa79hk: None of those are reliable. Read WP:MUSIC/SOURCES. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Angela Merkel already had autoarchiving switched on
You seem to have added redundant autoarchiving parameters to Talk:Angela Merkel but perhaps I am missing something. --Boson (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
You commented on my request at "To Kill a Mockingbird".
You wrote: " Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)" Please let me know where I might mention the changes you suggest. As you may surmise, I am lost here.
As I thought was said in the Wiki instructions, I was asking for help from others who are well versed, who would help me compile an interesting few sentences. So I included several points that I thought might be worthwhile to use in additions to the existing work. My intention is simply to add information about the final pages of the TKAM book which uses Seckatary Hawkins as reference. My problem is - I am not sure how to word what is acceptable. I imagine a paragraph at the very end of the current text would be workable. That might include the following:
Harper Lee uses the principles of one of her favorite childhood authors, Robert F. Schulkers, and the Seckatary Hawkins children’s adventure series to end her story. website: www.seckatary.com
Quotes of Seckatary Hawkins books - Stoners Boy and The Gray Ghost are used to illustrate the moral lesson of this story. The final 3 pages of To Kill A Mockingbird (2 pages in later editions) follows:
.................................................................................................................................................................
Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).First ed. Pages 294,295,296 , To Kill a Mockingbird - Harper Lee
Atticus was in Jem's room, sitting by his bed. He was reading a book. "Is Jem awake yet?" "Sleeping peacefully. He won't be awake until morning." "Oh. Are you sittin' up with him?" "Just for an hour or so. Go to bed, Scout. You've had a long day." "Well, I think I'll stay with you for a while." "Suit yourself," said Atticus. It must have been after midnight, and I was puzzled by his amiable acquiescence. He was shrewder than I, however: the moment I sat down I began to feel sleepy. "Whatcha readin'?" I asked. Atticus turned the book over. "Something of Jem's. Called The Gray Ghost." I was suddenly awake. "Why'd you get that one?" "Honey, I don't know. Just picked it up. One of the few things I haven't read," he said pointedly. "Read it out loud, please, Atticus. It's real scary." "No," he said. "You've had enough scaring for a while. This is too-" "Atticus, I wasn't scared." He raised his eyebrows, and I protested: "Leastways not till I started telling Mr. Tate about it. Jem wasn't scared. Asked him and he said he wasn't. Besides, nothin's real scary except in books." Atticus opened his mouth to say something, but shut it again. He took his thumb from the middle of the book and turned back to the first page. I moved over and leaned my head against his knee. "H'rm," he said. "The Gray Ghost, by Seckatary Hawkins. Chapter One..." I willed myself to stay awake, but the rain was so soft and the room was so warm and his voice was so deep and his knee was so snug that I slept. Seconds later, it seemed, his shoe was gently nudging my ribs. He lifted me to my feet and walked me to my room. "Heard every word you said," I muttered. "...wasn't sleep at all, 's about a ship an' Three-Fingered Fred 'n' Stoner's Boy...." He unhooked my overalls, leaned me against him, and pulled them off. He held me up with one hand and reached for my pajamas with the other. "Yeah, an' they all thought it was Stoner's Boy messin' up their clubhouse an' throwin' ink all over it an'..." He guided me to the bed and sat me down. He lifted my legs and put me under the cover. "An' they chased him 'n' never could catch him 'cause they didn't know what he looked like, an' Atticus, when they finally saw him, why he hadn't done any of those things... Atticus, he was real nice...." His hands were under my chin, pulling up the cover, tucking it around me. "Most people are, Scout, when you finally see them." He turned out the light and went into Jem's room. He would be there all night, and he would be there when Jem waked up in the morning. THE END ...............................................................................................................................
Thanks for your help.Seckatary (talk) 20:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Yours Fair & Square Randy Schulkers 1396 Quarter Mill Court Powhatan, VA 23139 www.seckatary.com
- @Seckatary: Edit requests are normally done in a "Change X to Y" manner, something like "Change 10 wins to 11 wins. They just won something. Here's a source proving it". Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Page rejection blues
Hello
I'm trying to get the Start Making Sense page up. It was rejected for lacking reliable sources. I'm a bit stumped. I think most of the sources were either Wikipedia or thenation.com, which has a million unique visitors a month. I would appreciate some specific guidance on what in the entry seemed unreliable.
Thank you, Jonas Oppenheim Ojonaso (talk) 23:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Ojonaso: Oops, sorry about that. I never actually looked at that draft, I must've declined the wrong one. Too many tabs open at once can do that
. I've reopened it for review. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
16:50:28, 22 February 2016 review of submission by Liga of figure skating
- @Liga of figure skating: You forgot to leave a message? Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
05:08:36, 23 February 2016 review of submission by NeuroproteXeon
Hi Anarchyte- Thanks for your help reviewing this article. I've only written content for one other wikipedia page eons ago and don't remember a lot about how I did it. I coule use some pointers on adding references. I've collected a bunch and need to add them as hypertext. I'm a little bit of a slow learner here! Any suggestions, in plain english would be appreciated. :) Thanks- NeuroproteXeon (talk) 05:08, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- @NeuroproteXeon: I feel as though the average reader would not understand what's going on. There are no defined in-line citations, etc. Because it is a company, you need to prove why the company is notable. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. Today I'm going to work on adding the citations. I have many references and links, I just have to figure out how to create them. NeuroproteXeon (talk) 17:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Request on 06:31:07, 23 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Kayzax
Hi~I just read the decline notice of my draft Timi Studio Group, and I fully understand the reason.
To be honest this is the first time I try to write an article on Wikipedia, so I think it would be better if I look for professional help.
The thing is, the Chinese version of "Timi Studio Group" already exists in Wikipedia's Chinese page, which to some point prove the notability of this organization. https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A4%A9%E7%BE%8E%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E5%AE%A4%E7%BE%A4
My original purpose is to translate it to an English version. But I can only find several low quality references in English. So my question is, instead of creating a brand new article, is there any other way to quickly translate an article from one language to another?
Look forward to your reply:)
Kayzax (talk) 06:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Kayzax: Check out WP:TRANSLATE. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Anarchyte,
Thanks for helping to review the post. It is my first attempt so any help is most appreciated! I have rewrote the post to be simpler and more authoritative. Please let me know what else I can do to improve for approval. Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Xiu48 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 23 February 2016
Hi Anarchyte,
I tried to remove academic references within the post. Hope it is better. Thanks. Xiu48 (talk) 13:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello Anarchyte
I'm Barbara (PunjabSis104)
This is my first time writing an article for Wikipedia... my son, Inder Nagra, is a Punjabi Singer in India
and I had been looking at another Punjabi singer from India, Gurdas Maan... so have written the article about my son, Inder.. listing his music albums, music videos, the award he received for best Punjabi Song in May 2015..
Am not sure what it is I need in the article so it is accepted...
Please advise... how do I fix so will be accepted
appreciate your help with this..
thank you
Barbara (PunjabSis104)PunjabSis104 (talk) 10:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- @PunjabSis104: You need to show why your son is notable. You can do this using reliable, third-party sources which provide an in-depth analysis of your son. Also, because he is your son, you need to read the guidelines on having a Conflict of Interest. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Inder Nagra
Hello
thank you for the reply I do need to clarify one thing... Inder Nagra isn't my blood son.. he calls me mom ... but we are not blood related... I met him in 2010 as he has been struggling to make a name for himself in the Punjabi music world.... He has been struggling and working hard to get where he is today...
how can I help him get his page posted? I'm not sure what is needed to be on the page to get it accepted
thank you Barbara OrtegaPunjabSis104 (talk) 13:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Small correction
Hi Anarchyte. Just thought I'd let you know that I made a slight change [1] to your {{db-copyvio}} tag on Draft:Retracted Soles. The URL needs the "http://" protocol specified in the URL for the copyvio and duplicator detector report links to work. Cheers. --Drm310 (talk) 14:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Added citations
Dear Anarchyte, Thanks for your message. I've added citation content to my post but fully expect that it is not yet up to snuff. I was stimulated to attempt creating an entry for my self because I am mentioned in various Wikepedia articles but there is no link for an interested party to follow. I'm hoping to remedy this. Regards Dick Russell Rmr8229 (talk) 18:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Germany's teacher of the year award (Deutscher Lehrerpreis) your comment
Dear Anarchyte, you advised that the Article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Germany's_teacher_of_the_year_award_%28Deutscher_Lehrerpreis%29 was overly referenced. I removed all the references (13) that aren't necessary and for example only included 1 reference for one claim such as the Süddeutsche Zeitung. Please review again! Is it OK like this? I had added so many sources before because it was said that notable references were missing-now I reduced them.88.67.242.56 (talk) 14:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
04:06:37, 29 February 2016 review of submission by 116.212.245.138
Good Morning,
I would like to get this page live on Wikipedia. Can you offer some tips that will get the page approved?
Thanks,
Claire
- @116.212.245.138: The main advice I can give you was in the decline reason. Basically, you need to find some reliable sources which prove the subject is notable. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
2016 GA Cup-Round 1
Greetings, all. The 3rd Annual GA Cup has officially begun, and you can start reviewing your articles/reassessments now! However, sign-ups will not close til March 15th if anybody (who wishes to sign up) has not signed up yet. We currently have 1 group of 33 contestants in Round 1, and we will have 16 Wikipedians left in Round 2. Please be sure to review this information and the FAQ if you haven't already, If you have any questions, please ask us here where all of the judges (including our newest one, Zwerg Nase!) will be answering any questions you may have. You can also feel free to ask us on our talk pages/send an email to us (information is here). Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
|
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Arcordibgto WP:CREATIVE,arti sts with works in major museums are notable. Therefore, I di not delete the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Appoligy
I'm sorry I made that edit Jake200503 (talk) 21:31, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Peter Alfred-Adekeye
Hello Anarchyte. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Peter Alfred-Adekeye, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not a copyvio - deletionpedia is a Wikipedia mirror. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 11:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
omrr
Hi, omrr is one of the most popular and notable electronic ambient musicians in Cairo, Egypt. His real name is Omar El Abd, do some research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisemenandthepainters (talk • contribs) 12:42, 11 March 2016
Hello Anarchyte You said my page on Peter Mitchell (photographer) was not accepted because he was not notable enough. I made some changes but it was rejected again by another editor. I have added MORE references. Could you take a look? I am really unsure why it's being rejected for notability because this photographer has been in the Tate..He's pretty important on the colour documentary scene. I have added as many references as I can but there is a dearth of information about him because, as everyone in the documentary scene knows, he has been underrepresented. Martin Parr - (certainly one of the most famous photographers in the UK) - attributed Peter Mitchell's exhibition in 1979 as groundbreaking. This is significant. Can you please take another look and tell me why this is not notable? Jessafair (talk) 12:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Jessafair - What can I tell you that Onel5969 hasn't already said in his reply to you on his talk page? Basically, you need to provide is with reliable, third-party sources that prove why the subject is notable. Having a lot of sources does not mean they're all reliable and as Onel5969 has said, some of your references are blogs and other unreliable sources. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks - I have already responded to the other user One|5969. Maybe you would like to check the additions I have made...I'm sorry if I've over-talked to the contributors. I was unsure how to use the Talk page or just re-submit. I have since added references including BBC and other info about permanent collections, news etc. Please let me know if this is suitable. Jessafair (talk) 11:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
In case you miss it on your watchlist
The pictures at Rust (video game) have been uploaded. I'm going to wait for verification of the license to go through before adding them to the article, but they're some pretty good ones. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 20:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks MjolnirPants. I've been busy IRL for the last few weeks, which is why I haven't spoken in any of the discussions on the talk page. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
23:20:06, 24 March 2016 review of submission by Jarmorton
Hi, I'm new and I'm having a little trouble understanding the problem with this article. Which of the two sources is not reliable? The book is written by a respected scholar of the period and the letters are from the National Archives. Could you clarify the problem?
Thank you
Jarmorton (talk) 23:20, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Reintroduced, Reintroducing, Reintroduction, and Reintroductions listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reintroduced, Reintroducing, Reintroduction, and Reintroductions. Since you have had some involvement with the Reintroduced, Reintroducing, Reintroduction, and Reintroductions redirects (i.e. Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 February 5#Re-introductory), you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Godsy(TALKCONT) 03:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
2016 GA Cup-Round 2
Greetings, GA Cup competitors! Wednesday saw the end of Round 1. Sainsf took out Round 1 with an amazing score of 765. In second place, MPJ-DK earned an astounding 742 points, and in third place, FunkMonk received 610 points. In Round 1, 206 reviews were completed, more than any other year! At the beginning of March, there were 595 outstanding nominations in the GAN queue; by the end of Round 1, there were 490. We continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in Round 2 so we can lower the backlog as much as possible. To qualify for the second round, you needed to make it into the top 16 of participants. Users were placed in 4 random pools of 4. To qualify for Round 3, the top 2 in each pool will progress, and there will also be one wildcard. This means that the participant who comes in 9th place (all pools combined) will also move on. Round 2 will start on April 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on April 28 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 2 and the pools can be found here Also, remember that a major rule change will go into effect starting on April 1, which marks the beginning of Round Two. Round 1 had an issue brought up in the rules, which we are correcting with this clarification. We believe that this change will make the competition more inherently fair. The new rule is: All reviews must give the nominator (or anyone else willing to improve the article) time to address the issues at hand, even if the article would qualify for what is usually called a "quick fail" in GA terms. To avoid further confusion, we have updated the scoring page, replacing the term "quick fail" with the term "fail without granting time for improvements". We expect all reviewers to put a review on hold for seven days in cases such as these as well, in order to apply the same standards to every competitor. The judges will strictly enforce this new rule. Good luck and have fun! Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
|
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
04:34:16, 30 March 2016 review of submission by Sutisoft
Hello,
The purpose of submitting this content is to list our corporate page on Wikipedia. If you think the content need to be improved to meet your requirement standard then please suggest the necessary changes.
Awaiting for your reply.
Thanks & Regards. SutiSoft Team.
- Hi Sutisoft. You have a Conflict of Interest with the subject of the article so please try to make it as neutral as possible. It currently reads like an advertisement and your references aren't all-that reliable. I recommend reading the links in this message, editing the page accordingly and resubmitting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:18, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
07:07:29, 30 March 2016 review of submission by Heemrad
The Mauser 1895 is made 3 years before the Karabiner 98k (Different service history + Design + variants + countries of use) also there is brief reference to the Mauser Model 1895 under Swedish M1894 rifle heading, which fails to mention the Mauser Model 1895 involvement in the Argentina/Chile arms race, the need for the weapon after the jameson raid, reasons why the weapon contract between GWM and the South African Government wasnt fulfilled, No extensive description on the design, all the countries of use and mention of variants. The snippet mentioned in "Swedish M1894 rifle" does not fully cover the history,design or variants of the Mauser Model 1895 and while the Mauser page does mention the Mauser Model 1895, it also does mention the Mauser Model 1871, Mauser Model 1889 etc that are briefly mentioned in the Mauser page but still have their own Main Article page (with the same amount or much less information).Heemrad (talk) 08:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
23:51:31, 28 March 2016 review of submission by ONAOVA
Hello. Thank you for reviewing the draft for the Teen Rehab (Website) Wikipedia page.
To address your feedback of providing reliable sources to support the subject's notability, I have provided links to articles on various publications (Psychology Today, Partnership for Drug-Free Kids, New York Post, CNN.com) that refer to Teen Rehab and Newport Academy.
If this Wikipedia page needs additional references, please advise as to what type of articles would meet the criteria for page submission.
Thanks again! ONAOVA (talk) 23:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- @ONAOVA: Hi, I've declined the submission again on the fact that the majority of the references are primary (which means they come directly from the subject). You need to get some secondary, reliable sources to back up your claims. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:20, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the clarification on the nature of references required for approval. To explain the changes that have been made: I have removed information from the Content section, as there were not enough secondary sources that speak to this section. I've added additional references to articles from WTNH, CBS New York, and Psychology Today that contribute to the validity of Newport Academy as an organization and provides further information on its founder. ONAOVA (talk) 00:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Draft AFC enrollment
Hi there. I see you recently enrolled a page into AFC Draft mode. Please be aware that the way you did it, did not include the page creator or the time that the page was enrolled into AFC. The optimal way to do this is by {{subst:AFC draft|USERNAME}} where USERNAME is the creator of the page. This way the page gets stamped with the date the draft was enrolled into AFC and the author for the purposes of G13 cleanup. Furthermore not all pages in the Draft namespace are AFC submissions, and not all AFC submissions are in the Draft namespace. Some editors may not want to use the AFC process (as it has the 6 months unedited deletion behind it). Thanks Hasteur (talk) 13:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry Hasteur, I normally just throw on
{{AFC submission|T}}because it adds the tag, I didn't know about the timestamp and username additions. I added the tag to that draft because it was made by a new user and instead of it being CSD'ed the second it was published it could be reviewed. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
11:11:35, 31 March 2016 review of submission by Sutisoft
Hello,
Thanks for your quick response & suggestions. We will submit the updated content soon.
Thanks & Regards. SutiSoft Team.
The info seems unnecessary in its own right, as the transfers are old, but it's also inconsistent in application (Why make note of those teams an not Astralis/TSM?) and in formatting. Additionally, the "(former Titan team)" one is questionable since the team qualified as G2 Esports. ItsIzumi (talk) 03:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:TopSpeed.com
Hi Anarchyte!
We've previously talked about Draft:TopSpeed.com, when you postponed its automated deletion. I have since incorporated your changes and further improved it, such as expanding the section about the site's content (and also adding further references here), structuring it better so it includes a lead, removing primary references and replacing them with third party reputable sources (such as the recent Miami Herald article).
I've resubmitted it afterwards and it still got declined due to a lack of sources talking about the subject itself (as opposed to the subject's content). While I know the recently added Miami Herald source doesn't go into much detail, it seems quite impossible to find other sources talking in-depth about an online publisher, except for cases where the publisher gets acquired by some company or media group (such as with other sites in Category:Automotive websites, eg. Pistonheads, Autoblog). Since publisher websites' popularity/reputability comes from their content, it's odd that references to that content would not be taken into consideration when establishing notability.
I feel like the article is or is very close to matching Wikipedia's standards, so I wanted to ask if there's any advice or help that you could provide. Much appreciated! WikiAlexandra (talk) 23:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Re feedback & decline of article "Artemis and Apollo"
Dear Anarchyte,
I have received your feedback on my submitted article, "Artemis and Apollo", and I wish to dispute your feedback and rejection of the article. I am not entirely sure that this page is the correct place to raise a discussion about feedback on a submitted article but I think it is; if not, then I apologise and would like to know the correct place.
---
In short, my objection is this: The article is about a media phenomenon known as an 'Internet celebrity cat' and in particular one pair of cats called "Artemis" and "Apollo". By definition, the phenomenon of an 'Internet celebrity cat' is something that happens primarily in the medium of the Internet. This particular pair of cats publish their materials on Instagram. Hence the article is primarily about something has happened, and is continuing to happen on Instagram. Therefore Instagram is the most authoritative source of information about the subject of this article. Therefore I must dispute your comment that Instagram is not an authoritative source.
Or, in a nutshell: my article is about stuff happening on Instagram; therefore Instagram is the most authoritative source of information.
---
If the above is not sufficient to rebut your comment, then let me run through the list of 45 references in this article.
(a) The article is primarily about a phenomenon on Instagram, but the content on the Instagram account relates to three real-world individuals (one human, two feline), and I therefore cite two government-issued documents that establish the actual names of the individuals, their relationship, and the breed and DoB of the cats. I think this is a valid reference. I can upload scans of the documents if really necessary. (References 1 & 2.)
(b) Prior to discussing the content of the Instagram material, I establish the existence of the Instagram account by means of an HTML link to it. I do not see how this can fail to be a valid reference. (Reference 3.)
(c) I have supplemented the article with a small amount of real-world information about the physical and behavioural characteristics of the cats, because this provides one of the sources of inspiration for the Instagram content. I believe this is appropriate for a critical appreciation of the Instagram content as a creative work. The source of this information is my conversation with Reka Komoli, who is identified as the legal owner of the cats, and sole author of the Instagram content. I think this is a valid reference. (Reference 4.)
(d) Next, I establish my claim that Artemis and Apollo are 'Internet celebrity cats' - albeit minor celebrities at the moment, but with a rate of growth that, if projected by a conservative linear extrapolation, will reach a quarter of a million followers in two years. To do this I cite the most popular image, which is on Instagram. Again, a reference to Instagram is the only authoritative source for the existence of an image on Instagram. (Reference 5.)
(e) And, to show the level of attention given on the Internet to this particular image, I cite the four Internet locations where the image has had most attention. Of necessity, these are Internet references, and three of them happen to be Instagram pages. These are valid and necessary references. (Reference 6.)
(f) For historical context (to support the critical appreciation of the Instagram material), I refer to a bet between Ms Komoli and another cat owner on Instagram. I have no documentary evidence for the bet, as it took place in private messaging between the two cat owners, but I can at least confirm the existence of other cat account by referencing it. (I have also met the other owner and her cat in person, but I did not mention this as it does not establish anything new.) Again, I am referencing Instagram in order to prove the existence of a particular Instagram account. (Reference 7.)
(g) To begin to explain the popular appeal of the Instagram account, I state that the photographic content arises from a range of geographic locations, and to establish this I reference Instagram posts from five geographically distant locations. Again, I am establishing the existence of certain Instagram content, which I can do only by citing Instagram content. (Note, four of the five Instagram pages cited include the relevant geolocation as determined by Instagram. Obviously this is not conclusive that the pictures were taken and uploaded in those locations, but it is certainly corroborative. I don't know why the last one has no location tag, but it was taken in a remote rural location in Hungary and uploaded via 4G, so maybe Instagram couldn't figure out the location.) Therefore I assert that these are valid Instagram references. (References 8 to 12.)
(h) I state that the majority of the material comprises stills and 15-second videos, which is readily establish by perusing the Instagram material and does not require a reference. I also state the owner has recently started uploading longer videos of the cats to YouTube and to establish this I refer to a YouTube video of 1m 15s. The only way to establish the existence of a video on YouTube is to make a reference to the video on YouTube. (Reference 13.)
(i) Most of the article describes the actual content of the Instagram material, and I can establish this only referencing the Instagram posts where the relevant content can be seen. How else can I show what is in this Instagram material, other than by referring directly to it? Each of my assertions about the content is backed up by my referring to a specific example of it on the Instagram account. These are therefore valid references. (References 14 to 19 and 26 to 45.)
(j) I assert that the celebrity cats Artemis and Apollo are now using Internet media other than Instagram: to establish this, I refer to the relevant accounts on Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, and YouTube. This is the only authoritative way to establish that point. (References 20 to 23.)
(k) I assert that the cats have marketed real-world merchandise: to establish this, I reference the web site of the manufacturer, where the products can be seen. (Reference 24.)
(l) To explain an unusual feature of the merchandise, I cite the published text on which it is based, hence I refer to a popular book by J.K. Rowling. (Reference 25.)
I believe I have based all of the statements made in my article on proper evidence, and in particular every statement about the cats' Internet presence is backed up by verifiable references.
If you wish to stand by your feedback comment, please would you state which of the 45 references you think is invalid, and state how - in principle - it might be possible to establish the statements made in the body of the article, other than by referencing material on Instagram.
I look forward to your early reply.
Regards Peter B Lloyd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter B Lloyd (talk • contribs) 13:36, 6 April 2016
- @Peter B Lloyd: Hi, in response to your message and continuation of the "Instagram is an unreliable source" message, I have a very short and simple thing to say. Instagram, in its entirety, is a primary source, which when it comes to referencing on Wikipedia, aren't always the greatest means of doing so. What Wikipedia believes a reliable, third-party source is the following: Something published by a reputable site, company, magazine, etc which talks about the topic at-hand in full detail, an in-depth analysis of the subject, if you will. Instagram is not one of those because anyone can post anything (abiding the Instagram T&C's, of course) about everything. Although, with that being said Instagram would be good for finding out how many likes the post has or when it was posted. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Regarding Re submission of SutiSoft Inc company page content on Wikipedia
Hello,
We have updated the SutiSoft Inc company page content on Wikipedia as per your suggestions and guideline. Hope this time it can meet your requirements. If you still feel this to be improved, it would be a great favour if you make the necessary changes.
Thanks & Regards, SutiSoft Team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sutisoft (talk • contribs) 07:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Sutisoft: Sorry to say but the draft is still far from being ready. I've tagged the article with all the things that need to fixed. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:59, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
MindSpot Clinic Draft
Thank you very much for your message Anarchyte! I am still learning how to write good articles and am looking forward to adding useful info to Wikipedia :) MaisieDobbs (talk) 01:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
11:17:13, 18 April 2016 review of submission by Agungkodok
- Agungkodok (talk · contribs)
Dear Anarchyte,
I am requesting a re-review on my article submission; "Bakrie & Brothers" that was declined due to "Bakrie Group" having existed already. The reply that I received was "Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Bakrie Group instead".
I understand that both companies have similar names, However I would like to correct this, Bakrie Group (Or locally known as Kelompok Usaha Bakrie) and Bakrie & Brothers are not the same company. Bakrie Group is a holding for various businesses in various industries (plantation, oil & gas, property development, telecommunications, etc.), while Bakrie & Brothers is just one of the subsidiary of Bakrie Group, concentrating on the manufacturing industry. Both company have different management and business model, and I would like to share this information to those interested in reading about Bakrie & Brothers.
To further clarify this, i have added on to "Bakrie & Brothers" article mentioning that it is just a subsidiary of Bakrie group. "Bakrie & Brothers is a subsidiary of Bakrie Group focusing manufacturing & infrastructure company headquartered in Indonesia[1][2]", citing Bakrie Group's website explaining it's subsidiaries (However, the content within the site is in Indonesian). On the article itself, I have citations from the company's annual report as well.
I do hope after this explanation my article submission on "Bakrie & Brothers" could be re-reviewed, and to be informed if there are further requirements, corrections, or clarification that needs to be done in order for the article to be published.
Thank you very much for your support Anarchyte,
Best Regards,
Anak Agung Gde Agung
References
- ^ http://www.untuknegeri.org/kelompok-bakrie/perusahaan
- ^ Pohan, Syafruddin (1992). Achmad Bakrie - Sebuah Potret Kerja Keras, Kejujuran, dan Keberhasilan. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kelompok Usaha Bakrie. p. 220.
{{cite book}}:|access-date=requires|url=(help)
- @Agungkodok: I've undone my edit, but I'll leave it up to someone else to re-review it. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:37, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Schauenburg Castle (Oberkirch), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oberkirch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Re: Thanks, but I have a question
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
—Preceding undated comment added 01:59, 21 April 2016
DYK for List of most disliked YouTube videos
On 5 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of most disliked YouTube videos, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Guinness World Records recognizes Justin Bieber's "Baby" as the most disliked YouTube video? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of most disliked YouTube videos. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, List of most disliked YouTube videos), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:54, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
reason for my article rejection
I recently posted an article and it has been rejected by giving the reason
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anshul01784 (talk • contribs) 11:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Anshul01784: I'm not sure what you want me to say here. You haven't asked any questions, just stated fact. Your article doesn't prove notability which means, as of the time writing this message, you don't prove that the person you're writing about is notable. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi Anarchyte,
You recently rejected my article on David Brading as you mentioned it did have reliable sources but you may have overlooked the references at the bottom, which link to Who's Who, Cambridge University and the British Academy. Perhaps you could have another look please.
Yoz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yozick72 (talk • contribs) 10:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Yozick72:You need more than 4 reliable, third-party references to prove notability, and it doesn't help when Amazon isn't a reliable source, leaving you at 3 references. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
@Anarchyte - Sorry didn't realise one needed four. But I have just added a fourth reference, so in total we have Who's who, Cambridge University, Oxford University Handbook and now the British Academy. Do let me know if that it now suitable and thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yozick72 (talk • contribs) 11:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi, just a heads-up that I've deprodded 8BitBoy, which you prodded, because per WP:PRODNOM an article which has previously been proposed for deletion can't be again (it was prodded the same day it was created in 2014 and I deprodded it a week later). So assuming you still think it ought to be deleted, it'll have to be via AfD. (Purely procedural on my part, at least at this stage – I thought two years ago that it was probably notable, but it's entirely possible that I was mistaken, or that the guidelines have changed, or both). – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)