User talk:Andelicek.andy
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ganglamedo, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://exp.chinafilm.com/Movies/indexnr.php?film_id=chinafilm20090106234828/82.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
September 2010[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ganglamedo has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adNA_tw3g3k. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
March 2012[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kangyur, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. GotR Talk 15:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- I do not consider such important on page about Kangyur (part of Tibetan culture) write chinese name....or do you write chinese word on every page of wiki? Andelicek.andy (talk)
- 1) It is pointless to use {{Infobox Chinese}} without inputting Chinese, and all things in the PRC-controlled parts of Tibet are Chinese. 2) Of course not. GotR Talk 16:09, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- i talk about traditional tibetan culture. not about politics/last 60 years. or why in articles about Mongolia are not chinese infoboxes? it also was part of china Andelicek.andy (talk)
- So? Mongolia WAS part of China, unlike most of Tibet, which still is. And you have still not replied to why it is useless to use {{Infobox Chinese}} without inputting any Chinese. GotR Talk 17:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Because, who wants to see chinese name of Kangyur, can turn to chinese version of article. Tibetan traditional culture is not part of Chinese traditional culture (no politics, just facts). Why chinese inventions, part of chinese traditional culture, as gunpowder or paper don't have chinese infobox? doesn't make sence at all. Kangyur have nothing to do with chinese, infobox is useless than. wiki should't befool people Andelicek.andy ([[User talk:Andelicek.andy#top|A
- "...although in many cases the Tibetan text was translated from Chinese or other languages". Thus there is sufficient grounds for inclusion. Also, the box was added by a user with much experience with {{Infobox Chinese}} and {{zh}}, and also has good judgment on when inclusion of material is appropriate. GotR Talk 18:45, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- I can also add million of chinese infoboxes and will have much experience. My car was also made in China, so on company's wiki page should be chinese infobox. Btw. Kangyur in chinese language even have no chinese word. It's only phonetic translation.
- By your mediocre logic, Urumqi, Lhasa, Hohhot, etc. should have no Chinese language information. You cannot win against me. GotR Talk 02:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- Wiki user page is playground for fights? don't think so. Actually, it's nice offer to delete chinese language from english version of those cities (all those chinese are only phonetic translations, nothing usefull). Ad to your yesterday last post - Tibetan Buddhism is Chinese invention? It comes from China? Use Chinese infobox then. Unfortunatelly for you, Buddhism comes from India. why there is no Hindi infobox? i think you are Chinese, otherwise you understand my mediocre logic.
- According your logic, all Tibetan pages should have chinese infobox? Why they don't have already? Dalai Lama page has, even it's MONGOLIAN tradition. Shouldn't have Mongolian infobox than? According your logic, if everything what have something to do with today's PRC should have chinese infobox, than more than half of english wiki will have chinese infobox. If you are not chinese, you can understand my mediocre logic.
- Wiki user page is playground for fights? don't think so. Actually, it's nice offer to delete chinese language from english version of those cities (all those chinese are only phonetic translations, nothing usefull). Ad to your yesterday last post - Tibetan Buddhism is Chinese invention? It comes from China? Use Chinese infobox then. Unfortunatelly for you, Buddhism comes from India. why there is no Hindi infobox? i think you are Chinese, otherwise you understand my mediocre logic.
- By your mediocre logic, Urumqi, Lhasa, Hohhot, etc. should have no Chinese language information. You cannot win against me. GotR Talk 02:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- I can also add million of chinese infoboxes and will have much experience. My car was also made in China, so on company's wiki page should be chinese infobox. Btw. Kangyur in chinese language even have no chinese word. It's only phonetic translation.
- "...although in many cases the Tibetan text was translated from Chinese or other languages". Thus there is sufficient grounds for inclusion. Also, the box was added by a user with much experience with {{Infobox Chinese}} and {{zh}}, and also has good judgment on when inclusion of material is appropriate. GotR Talk 18:45, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Because, who wants to see chinese name of Kangyur, can turn to chinese version of article. Tibetan traditional culture is not part of Chinese traditional culture (no politics, just facts). Why chinese inventions, part of chinese traditional culture, as gunpowder or paper don't have chinese infobox? doesn't make sence at all. Kangyur have nothing to do with chinese, infobox is useless than. wiki should't befool people Andelicek.andy ([[User talk:Andelicek.andy#top|A
- So? Mongolia WAS part of China, unlike most of Tibet, which still is. And you have still not replied to why it is useless to use {{Infobox Chinese}} without inputting any Chinese. GotR Talk 17:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- i talk about traditional tibetan culture. not about politics/last 60 years. or why in articles about Mongolia are not chinese infoboxes? it also was part of china Andelicek.andy (talk)
- 1) It is pointless to use {{Infobox Chinese}} without inputting Chinese, and all things in the PRC-controlled parts of Tibet are Chinese. 2) Of course not. GotR Talk 16:09, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
No point in responding to someone who has not an ounce of neutrality, especially if they are foolish enough to write on Wikipedia "Chinese occupation...". GotR Talk 02:37, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ask the guys who self-immolated why they did it? Write in article 'because of peaceful libaration' would be ridiculous. No point in responding to someone who is evidently sinicizated. Let's sinicizate whole english wiki. Andelicek.andy (talk) 12:32, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- If you looked carefully, I wrote "Chinese rule", which is indisputably accurate, and I don't think it was a "peaceful" liberation at all. It seems pretty clear that you think everyone who disagrees with you on Tibetan issues is either PRC-affiliated or otherwise has undergone Sinification. GotR Talk 18:43, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- As you wish Andelicek.andy (talk) 19:25, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- Just now I saw you are probably Chinese. Finally it make me sence why you are so ignorant to truth... Andelicek.andy (talk) 11:41, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
- As you wish Andelicek.andy (talk) 19:25, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- If you looked carefully, I wrote "Chinese rule", which is indisputably accurate, and I don't think it was a "peaceful" liberation at all. It seems pretty clear that you think everyone who disagrees with you on Tibetan issues is either PRC-affiliated or otherwise has undergone Sinification. GotR Talk 18:43, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 20[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pumi people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tibetan language. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For helping finish the list of Tibetan townships! Hope to see some of the missing lists started too! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC) |
Hi, I know that Tibet is your focus but seems as you did a great job, is there any chance you could create the ones for List of township-level divisions of Sichuan, List of township-level divisions of Yunnan, List of township-level divisions of Qinghai, List of township-level divisions of Inner Mongolia and List of township-level divisions of Ningxia?♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:33, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- :D :D Actually I was thinking about Qinghai cause it's part of original Tibet, also west Sichuan,.... Find correct Tibetan names sometimes takes ages, but most of this homework from you would be only in Chinese, it will be just copy-past from chinese websites (except for Kham and Amdo of course, I search native names volunteerly :D) I keep list of towns in EN/ZH which cannot connect/links wrong. Still checkig TAR... Later will contact you or your friend from last time to fix it. Andelicek.andy (talk) 11:06, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- I know your feelings on China, but eventually we do need to cover all of the townships, not just Tibet! Your listing these townships really goes a long way towards planning growth on here. Perhaps you could agree to do the full lists of Qinghai and Sichuan anyway, that would be a great help.Given time I will try to start all of the townships for Tibet, Qinghai and Sichuan.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- of course if I start one of those lists, I will do all, not just Tibetan parts :D :D you also forgot Gansu, dont see the list. All these non-chinese parts of PRC are good to me :) just it takes some time. You mean you will make page for every single township? Ha! enjoy! Andelicek.andy (talk) 12:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- I know your feelings on China, but eventually we do need to cover all of the townships, not just Tibet! Your listing these townships really goes a long way towards planning growth on here. Perhaps you could agree to do the full lists of Qinghai and Sichuan anyway, that would be a great help.Given time I will try to start all of the townships for Tibet, Qinghai and Sichuan.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Tibetan place names[edit]
While mapping missing towns in Tibet on OpenStreetMap I stumbled upon a list of towns including Tibetan place names in Baingoin County; I found you having added the names (thank you! ;) Are there any sources in internet for Tibetan place names? The only source I've found is a list with bo/zh places on tibetan.qh.gov.cn. Some monasteries I could identify on tbrc.org... --katpatuka (talk) 14:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- This one tibetan.qh.gov.cn is cool! Thanks! I used to search on Tibetan library [1], [2], but later I also borrowed "secret" book from one friend in Lhasa with names of TAR places. 09:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Andelicek.andy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Andelicek.andy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)