User talk:Anderson (Public)

This user is an alternative account for Anderson.
It is a legitimate alternative account, used to edit Wikipedia on public computers to maintain security.
If this account is abusing Wikipedia, please contact Anderson to inform them that this account has been compromised.
Any comments should be posted on Anderson's talk page.
See contribs—page moves—all logs—block log

i did the chanegs as guided by you at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lasjan Online now plz accept it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chintu6 (talk • contribs) 09:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC) if wikipedia still decides to decline...then plz delete it...i give up — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chintu6 (talk • contribs) 09:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The submission hasagain been declined,But not by me. Article are only accepted if they meet the article guidelines.--Anderson - What's up? 08:29, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PERM[edit]

Hi Anderson. I realise you mean well, but I'll mention once again that there really is no need to close and comment on WP:PERM requests. Those pages are strictly an admin domain, and although the comments of some very experienced non-admins and their help with archiving editors might occasionally be helpful, admins do their own thorough checks and have some additional research tools too. Perhaps you would like to help out reverting vandalism instead. Take care, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:19, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've started participating at WP:AFC.--Anderson - What's up? 08:26, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

00:34, 01 September 2012[edit]

Hey, mind if I ask why you reverted my talk page to an old revision stating that I had changed someone else comment in the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games when I haven't? I think that might be against Wiki guidelines. Kane (talk) 23:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting the warnings won't help you avoid a block. Deleted warnings can still be seen in the page history.--Anderson (Public) (talk) 23:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't trying to avoid the block, I was trying to clean up my talk page. I know that all past revisions stay in the history. Kane (talk)@ —Preceding undated comment added 23:59, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anderson. Tip: Unless it's to revert clear cases of blatant vandalism or restoring a block notice, refactoring any user page or sub page without the user's express permission is generally a big no no. That said, it's not a blockable offense unless it demonstrates a pattern of disruptive editing after repeated warnings - see {{uw-tpv1}}. See also WP:NOBAN for more details, and if you need any advice don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Info on how to get User:MiszaBot III to archive your TP can be found at User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo.--Anderson - What's up? 21:58, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent decline review at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Extractive electrospray ionization[edit]

Did you check the references? Doesn't look like nonsense to me. Noom _talk ^stalk 23:46, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, could you clarify why you think it is nonsense? Noom _talk ^stalk 00:08, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed a sentence was repeated.--Anderson - What's up? 21:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help![edit]

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2654 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?

Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at WP:AFCH!

News

Good article nominee

04 Aug 2012 – Parental brain (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Carina1205 (t · c); see discussion

AFCH script improvements

1.16 to 1.17
- Batman still works!

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser ^TSU

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 08:56, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]