User talk:Andramere

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Andramere, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 22:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have a conflict of interest[edit]

The request to edit National Educational Technology Standards by NETS conflicts with the interests of Wikipedia.

Hello, Andramere. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article National Educational Technology Standards, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 22:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How to request an edit to the article[edit]

As you have a conflict of interest, I undid your edits to National Educational Technology Standards please use the wp:Edit requests system for asking for changes to that article. This is Wikimedia foundation's website, not ISTE's. So, ISTE may request changes to the article but they should not directly change the article. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 22:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ISTE Standards (February 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ISTE Standards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ISTE Standards (February 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ISTE Standards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ISTE Standards (March 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysquirrel was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at National Educational Technology Standards. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment they left was:

There is already an article under the old name which needs lots of improvement. Some of the content, and most of the references, of this version should be added to that version. The old version should also be moved, which I can do for you if you like.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ISTE Standards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Happy Squirrel (talk) 23:36, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've read a bit more background on the situation. If you would rather I, as an editor with no COI, performed the merge, I am very open to that. Thanks! Happy Squirrel (talk) 00:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Happy Squirrel (talk). It won't work well to just add the new info to the National Educational Technology Standards page because that is no longer the name of the standards. The page does need to be moved to a new page with the new name. However, I was under the impression that I can't make that move myself. It would be great if you could perform that merge and let me know. Thank you! Andramere (talk) 22:34, 12 April 2016 (UTC) Andramere (talk) 22:35, 12 April 2016 (UTC)andramere[reply]