User talk:Andran

Re: GEO vs BEOH[edit]

El GEO no es ni el BEOH ni el GEOF, y la "traducción" hecha por Clarín es incorrecta: como todos sabemos, el único Grupo Especial de Operaciones es el del CNP español. Creo que quisieron hablar de los Grupos Especiales Operativos de cada DDI bonaerense. Saludos. --Nkcs 03:05, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Home of the Underdogs[edit]

Hi. Thanks for that note at Talk:Home of the Underdogs. (You've cheered me up: I had thought that my tendency to omit the dash was premature senility.) Do you happen to know any more details of the first domain name change? I'd like to put something about it in the article. Cheers, CWC(talk) 08:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! Now I see your suggestion for replying. Anyway, my answer is here :-) Andran 19:45, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're not the only one confused about where to hold conversations. As far as I can tell, the original idea was to write on each others talk pages. The new fashion is to Watch the talk page of anyone you leave a message for, and reply to messages on your own talk page, but not everyone does this. Clearly I need to make my I'll-be-watching-you message clearer ;-).

I found http://www.the-underdogs.info/history.php, which talks about the previous name change. I'll add something to the article. ^@(*&^(*&% cybersquatters! We hates them, we hates them forever!

Cheers, CWC(talk) 11:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appraisal and Assessment of the Roman military (discussion)[edit]

Currently we are discussing this part of Military history of ancient Rome and I strongly favor to delete it and make a case to case study of the roman military in contrary to the opponents faced. There is also the possibility to shift this section to Roman legion. As you are one of the major writers of it, your opinion would be of interest. But I must warn you on the aspect that your sources and writing style were not universally approved. Wandalstouring 17:57, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are mistaken. I haven't written anything in that article and in fact I know nothing of Roman history. I just edited out a poorly written section; something that looked like a paper a highschool student would write.Andran 02:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. My mistake. Well, the conclusions there are still highschool level and currently a source for trouble. Wandalstouring 08:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]