Welcome![edit]

Hello, Andrecanada, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Charlie anne xavier, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 14:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Drmies, I am so sorry, I hit published before i was finsihed with the article, please forgive me for this mistake. This is my first article. I will work as you have suggested on the article development. Thank you for your help. Andrecanada (talk) 14:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charlie Anne xavier[edit]

The article []] has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on [[Talk:|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Q ^{T C} 16:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

=Speedy deletion nomination of [[:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on [[requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by [[:|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Hello Andrecanada. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Andrecanada. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Andrecanada|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae. I am NOT being paid, or have an financial stake on the Article, I am a resident of Charlottesville, VA and story is incredible popular and has gained national media attention that is why i wrote the article, i did follow all the wikipedia guidelines, I am just very confused why it keeps getting deleted, and now aksed to be blocked for good? I am genuily shocked, how can we came to an agreement? have you googled the person name to see if she has the credentials ? Thank you so much for your time. Andrecanada (talk) 16:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andre, I noticed in your comment on Praxidicae's talk page that you said you are husband. Her accident sounds horrific, and this must have been very hard for you both. I hope her recovery continues. That said, the incident simply doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. Please read WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTNEWS. Schazjmd (talk) 17:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Schazjmd for your kind words.

Here is the reason why I decided to write about her accident, if you notice her article has a focus on her medical care, Burns are a world wide issue, and the new treatment used on her, has the potential to save thousands of lifes, and the information i shared is of huge public interested, here is an example of a page created by a burn survivor as well, and to me looks like they focused on promotion, Stephanie Nielson and ulike , we are not promoting a blog, or anything personal. I hope the article can be published, I can place any disclaimer needed.

one user, just posted this on the deletion contest page: This page should not be speedily deleted because... (I've been following story since the first time I saw it on the internet here in the Philippines. I highly believe that her story deserves to be published here in wikipedia because of the information about machines, medical terms, and all other related stuff to a burn survivor that can help people around the globe. It also shares details that would help us understand how a burn survivor's journey is and inspire people to continue fighting no matter how hard their situation is.) Andrecanada (talk) 17:08, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but Wikipedia isn't the place to 'spread the word" or to inspire people. (In addition, any medical information needs to be based on sources suitable for medical reference.) Schazjmd (talk) 17:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article was edit to just the medical facts, and they are are backed by medical papers. the article is not inspiring at all, it is factual. thank you. Andrecanada (talk) 17:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What you would want to do in this case is write about the medical procedure, not about the patient. It's likely already been covered in wiki, but you are welcome to expand the article. But I suppose you are blocked now, so the point is moot. Oaktree b (talk) 02:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of [[:]] for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlie Anne xavier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PRAXIDICAE💕 17:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Andrecanada (talk) 17:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion[edit]

@Andrecanada: I'm terribly sorry about the accident and, for whatever it's worth, you have my deepest sympathies and hopes for a good recovery. While Wikipedia is not a place for WP:ADVOCACY, it is a place that is in great need of editors, and there are a plethora of articles related to burn accidents and medical care that could always use editors like you to improve them (from a neutral point-of-view). I think you'll find it very rewarding to take on the responsibility of improving these topics, and I hope that you do. Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 18:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andrecanada. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~TNT (talk • she/her) 18:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I must have been hacked, tons of accounts just appeared on my wall saying that is Blocked for sockpuppetry. Andrecanada (talk) 18:58, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andrecanada (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe my account has been hacked, I only have this account, I will no longer pursue the article

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Andrecanada (talk) 19:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On your wall? What does this even mean? I'm afraid being "hacked" does not account for the evidence at the SPI. FWIW, the SPI shows three accounts connected to this one. Also, if your account has been "hacked," it would be WP:COMPROMISED. On the other hand, that would have shown up in the check user report. Be that as it may, you will need check user review of your block. As you have an open unblock request, one should be along to review your block. Best. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I figured something was up with this account. Guess it was. Oaktree b (talk) 02:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #57594[edit]

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:38, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]