User talk:Andrewpmk/Archive 4

Archives: /Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3

Substitution[edit]

I was doing some cleanup and found a transclusion of yours. I've sure you're aware, so I won't use the {{subst:subst}} template. Cheers,
brenneman ^(t)^(c) 02:09, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uel[edit]

I've moved this entry to a new article, List of minor Biblical figures. I hope this outcome is satisfactory to you, as it preserves the information, which is not likely to be expanded upon. Cheers! BD2412 ^talk 00:45, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kalamaki[edit]

Andrew

I have created a disambiguation page for a couple of Greek places as well as the dish which is an alternative name for Souvlaki. I have also created a stub for the resort. There are other links on what links here relating to a Greek place but I am uncertain of where. I have outlined a strategy on the talk page for sorting out the problem.

I would be grateful if you could have a look at the disambiguation page and the stub on Kalamaki (Zakynthos).

Capitalistroadster 10:51, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My Welcome Message[edit]

Thank you very much for making that correction in my welcome message! I didn't even notice it until now. Ac e tic '^Acid 06:30, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

confused[edit]

How come I am not allowed to delete my old comments? It's not like it's completely gone. It's all in my history if you want to see the comments. (Jessica Liao 20:47, 26 October 2005 (UTC))[reply]

I did not know that but thank you for telling me about it. (Jessica Liao 20:56, 26 October 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Your criticism[edit]

You criticised editing by someone at 165.228.129.12

Please keep in mind that "Such an IP address can be shared by several users". If you have a complaint, it might be wise to indicate which article you are complaining about, so there is some relevance to your comment.

No need to delete[edit]

If you read, you'd see that the Karai article is on the 2003 TMNT series.

DaGreatSaiyajin 03:13, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nose/Bone[edit]

Some people get their bone pierced.

Personal attack[edit]

You gave no reason for deleting my List page and did not address my concerns in the talk page as dictated by Wikipedia policy. Please explain. Or I will walk over from next door at Goodes Hall of Queen's University, on the same block as KC, and punch you in the nose. If you go eat at Mack-Corry or JDUC cafeterias like all other useless KC students I will also punch you in the nose at those locations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.15.82.217 (talk • contribs)

Reverting vandalism by 168.8.230.251[edit]

Hi, I was trying to clean up a trail left by above IP but somebody had already done it in this article and I reverted to an out-of-date version. Apologies! Dlyons493 Talk 02:11, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Test tags[edit]

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that you don't have to manually add the "This message is regarding the page" when warning a vandal. You can use the test-n templates, all the test templates have corresponding test-n templates. Example: {{test4-n|George W. Bush}}. Just letting you know, it's a timesaver. -Greg Asche (talk) 23:28, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actrise Article[edit]

Hi. I saw your comment on my talk page. Did you enjoy the Actrise article or were you just reviewing it? Guermantes 21:35, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar[edit]

I hereby award you The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar, for your efforts on RCP. Who 19 November 2005

List of Marvel Comics characters[edit]

I recently reverted apparent vandalism on the List of Marvel Comics characters, restoring wikilinks and headers that had been removed from the A, B, and C characters only. My comment reads "rv removal of subheaders/wikilinks". Almost immediately afterward, you reverted my revert as vandalism. Was this an error? If not, you surely owe me an explanation. -- SCZenz 19:19, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was a mistake. I have a habit of reverting edits which appear to remove content, but sometimes they are not vandalism. Andrew_pmk | Talk 19:26, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, my edit added back content, and my edit summary stated this clearly. I guess the confusion must've arose because the diff page looks so confusing...? At any rate, I'd ask you to be more careful—I've never been rvv'd before in 2000+ edits, and this seemed to be an odd time to start. -- SCZenz 19:59, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]