User talk:AngelWarrior02

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Loriendrew. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bloop because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 02:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bloop. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 02:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bloop with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster _talk 03:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at William Shatner, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 03:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:uw-harass4:User talk:Acroterion}}--Mr Fink (talk) 03:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:36, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]