User talk:Angry cuman

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Angry cuman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Angry cuman (talk) 15:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Angry cuman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I was blocked for “abuse” when I did nothing with the account, people make mistakes, but I did not with this account, and there are some pages on Wikipedia that are not true, such as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints says that Joseph Smith is the founder, this is not true, Jesus Christ is our founder, you all are just atheists. Angry cuman (talk) 15:22, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please see WP:TRUTH. We don't deal in truth, as truth is in the eye of the beholder, we deal in what can be verified. You don't have to be aware of every Wikipedia guideline, but you do need to be willing to abide by the ones that are pointed out to you. Saying that you don't care about them isn't conducive to being unblocked, and as such I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 15:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Angry cuman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here, I have read and now understand the Wikipedia guidelines, I hope now I can rejoin the Wikipedia community! I apologize for my outbursts, thank you! Angry cuman (talk) 15:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am not convinced. Your next appeal needs to carefully take into account 1. what you did wrong 2. exactly why you understand it was wrong 3. generally what you will edit once unblocked. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 16:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please see WP:BLANKING, which states "A number of important matters may not be removed by the user—they are part of the wider community's processes: Declined unblock requests regarding a currently active block." Do not do this again, or you will lose access to this page too. 331dot (talk) 15:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 15:53, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per my warning and the policy above, I have removed your access to this page. Your request will remain open, but if it is declined, you will need to use UTRS as noted above for further appeals. 331dot (talk) 15:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]