Jump to content

User talk:AnimationObjectShow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sungai Klang Expressway (April 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gpkp was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gpkp [u • t • c] 05:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, AnimationObjectShow! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gpkp [u • t • c] 05:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! AnimationObjectShow (talk) 08:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sungai Klang Expressway (April 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Imzadi1979 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please add more sources before resubmitting this.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Imzadi 1979 → 07:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts and articles[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Sungai Klang Expressway a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Sungai Klang Expressway. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 23:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North–South Expressway northern route, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kubang Pasu. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sungai Klang Expressway moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sungai Klang Expressway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Imzadi 1979 → 21:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please add more sources to the draft. The only source is a bare link to the home page of a website, which is really not sufficient to source the article because it's not very specific. Please don't be impatient. We don't work under any deadlines here. When the draft is ready, it will be approved. Imzadi 1979 → 22:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sungai Klang Expressway for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sungai Klang Expressway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sungai Klang Expressway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pandah Indah Link moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Pandah Indah Link, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you moved this draft into the main article space? A single source, once cited, is not enough to support the article. As it stands, it is likely to just end up being deleted. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North–South Expressway (Malaysia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kubang Pasu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use font tags[edit]

<font>...</font> tags are obsolete and have been removed from article and template space. Please use span tags instead, like this. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And closing span tags need to be on the same line where they started, like this. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A bigger problem is that these tables do not comply with MOS:RJL. I just tried cleaning up the toll plazas in that article. They should not have that background and white text. They're missing the place for the kilometer post, etc. Imzadi 1979 → 22:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK! AnimationObjectShow (talk) 08:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing span tags need to be on the same line of text where they started, like this. Please do not insert a line break before span tags. It makes work for other editors. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please be more careful. It may help to turn on the "syntax highlighter" gadget in your preferences so that other editors do not have to clean up your syntax errors. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:48, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sungai Klang Expressway[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sungai Klang Expressway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sungai Klang Expressway. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Imzadi 1979 → 06:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Graphics as text[edit]

Regarding your reversion at {{Malaysian Expressway System}}, please remember that graphics are not a substitute for text. Please do not reinsert them into that navbox. Imzadi 1979 → 06:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add a point. The templates for those graphics do not generate alt text. That means that a screen reader for the blind will skip those graphics and not read anything. There are other issues, so stop reinserting them. Imzadi 1979 → 06:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"MetaCorp Expressways" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect MetaCorp Expressways and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 30#MetaCorp Expressways until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 07:24, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SAVAGE Oobi moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, SAVAGE Oobi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 08:35, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! AnimationObjectShow (talk) 08:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SAVAGE Oozi! moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, SAVAGE Oozi!, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Imzadi 1979 → 09:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok AnimationObjectShow (talk) 09:43, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Savage Oozi! moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Savage Oozi!, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 09:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Savage Oozi! moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Savage Oozi!, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 09:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok AnimationObjectShow (talk) 09:43, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article[edit]

I have moved "SAVAGE Oozi!" to a draft in your user space. It is now located at User:AnimationObjectShow/Savage Oozi!. I'm going to redirect all of your other drafts on this topic to that location as well. Please do not attempt to put an article on that topic back in main space until it meets the General Notability Guideline. This means that the topic has "significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject". Unless and until you can meet that guideline, no draft on the topic will be accepted. In the future, attempts to get around GNG may just be sent off for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 15:23, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is clearly not ready for main space. Please work on the draft in your user space. It needs citations to meet WP:GNG to be considered appropriate for main space as an article. If you need help figuring out what this means, ask. Continuing to move the draft over will just continue in editors removing it back. Failure to understand and acknowledge these issues may result in removal of your editing privileges in the future. Imzadi 1979 → 15:37, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rschen7754 16:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lanang Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MPV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Savage Oozi! for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Savage Oozi! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savage Oozi! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Imzadi 1979 → 04:53, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of P Head & Pals[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on P Head & Pals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://patrick-jenner.fandom.com/wiki/P-Head_and_Pals. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiVirusC(talk) 14:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Savage Oozi![edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Savage Oozi! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Junction lists[edit]

Edits like this one are not helpful. What was there before mostly compiled with MOS:RJL, the section of our Manual of Style on "road junction lists". In short, Most of Malaysia's junction list tables are very non-compliant. You took one of the few that was mostly compliant and converted into a form that just plain doesn't work well.

  1. Why are there all of those background colors? What do they mean? Unlike the compliant table for Pandan Indah Link, there's no color key. It looks like the same shade of green is used for toll plazas and one type of border. This is very confusing.
  2. Where are the columns for the geographic locations? There are various borders listed, but there's no indication which territory applies above or below that line in the table. There's also no good indication of which level of territory is which and how it fits into the scheme of things.
  3. Why are there graphics in the km column?
  4. Why are some of these interchange names linked? In general, individual interchanges are rarely notable enough to warrant articles, so they should not be linked.
  5. What's with all the boldface text? In general, boldface is only used for the subject/name of the article and any alternate names in the lead; it is rarely used in the body of an article, and never like this.
  6. Why do we need to list the word "exit" in the exit column? Why does the exit number need a yellow background?
  7. Why is some text in all caps? In general, the Manual of Style does not permit us to use all caps. The exception would be various abbreviations, like "NASA", which stands for "National Aeronautics and Space Administration". (Even in some varieties of English, like British English, that would be formatted "Nasa".)
  8. On the toll plazas, why do you list various toll tags multiple times each?
  9. The white text on dark backgrounds is problematic.
  10. There are too many graphics being used to indicate meaning that should be text. In general, in a junction list, we only use graphics for the markers of the intersecting highways and a few intermodal connections. In both cases, the adjacent text mentions the intersecting highway by number and mentions what intermodal connection applies. Here, nothing is explained. You're assuming that a reader knows what all of those icons mean without explanation. Remember, not all of the readers of this article will be from Malaysia! Additionally, some of the graphics seem to be there to provide details best left to a travel guide. Remember, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. If you'd like to work on a travel guide, there's Wikivoyage.

Maybe you're trying to copy the formatting of the signage along the roadway? We don't do really that. We copy some elements, like the marker graphics for the intersecting highways, but we copy the information from signage. In short, the effect of this table is a bunch of information thrown in a table without any organization. Deleting the table would be more useful to a reader than leaving this in place.

I also understand that maybe you're just trying to make this one article match the others, but in this situation, you should be trying to make the other articles match what was in this article before.

Take a look at M-6 (Michigan highway)#Exit list.

  1. The county and location columns clearly indicate where these exits are located. The first two are both in Ottawa County, each in different townships. The other six are clearly in Kent County; the first three are clearly in Byron Township, and the other three are each in different townships.
    • The context of the article makes it clear that everything is in the US state of Michigan, so we don't have to mention that here.
    • U.S. Route 141#Major intersections involves a highway that crosses back and forth over state lines, so there's a column to clearly indicate in which state each intersection is located.
    • In all cases, the hierarchy of location types is indicated, moving from the most general at the left to the more specific at the right: states ➡️ counties ➡️ cities/village/townships ➡️ the junction itself.
  2. We have a clear indication of the mileposts (with converted km values) for each of the exits to give a sense of the distances involved.
  3. The exit column simply lists the exit numbers. There's no need for additional decoration.
  4. Each destination is clearly listed; no extra graphics are needed. For exit 15, the airport is signed as a destination for that interchange; the airport graphic from the sign is present and the airport is listed as one of the destinations. This is the only location where graphics are allowed. Since the eye is naturally drawn to graphics or formatted text, this is the one place where it makes sense to allow them.
  5. The one use of color, in this case the standard dark pink for an incomplete interchange is:
    • Explained in the notes;
    • Has the tooltip that will appear if a reader hovers the cursor over the line ("Incomplete access");
    • Has the color listed in the key at the bottom of the table.
  6. Finally, because none of the text is white, if a reader prints this article and omits the backgrounds, all of the black text will appear. Yes, the color for exit 15 will disappear, but the meaning of that color is still explicit in the notes for that interchange.
  7. Any other notes are short and to the point in their own specific column. If the situation were too complicated, we would explain it in further detail in the route description of the article.

In summary: Malaysia's highway articles continue to use a number of very bad practices for junction list tables. Readers from other countries will just not understand what a lot of those formatting choices are supposed to mean; they'd be better off without the table than to try to use what's been given. Instead, guidelines were developed years ago to make a standardized, but flexible, format for these tables. These guidelines incorporate best practices in terms of formatting that works with the rest of Wikipedia's Manual of Style. The structure and presentation of the tables using these guidelines organizes, simplifies, and clarifies the information being given. Imzadi 1979 → 11:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply if you understand this or not. Imzadi 1979 → 05:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DUKE Extension Expressway moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, DUKE Extension Expressway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 05:43, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


An article you recently created, DUKE Extension Expressway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 01:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


An article you recently created, DUKE Extension Expressway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Imzadi 1979 → 02:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been moved by three different editors to draft space in about 24 hours. Since the first time, the only work has been the addition of a single reference. That alone does not satisfy the WP:GNG concerns.
Please do not move the draft back to main space again by yourself. Do some meaningful work on it, and when you think it's ready, submit it through the WP:AfC process. Anything else will be considered disruptive and frowned upon. Imzadi 1979 → 02:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DUKE Extension Expressway (May 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Imzadi1979 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A single source is not sufficient.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Imzadi 1979 → 02:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MEX Extension Expressway moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, MEX Extension Expressway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:MEX Extension Expressway has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:MEX Extension Expressway. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DUKE Extension Expressway moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, DUKE Extension Expressway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Imzadi 1979 → 06:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:DUKE Extension Expressway has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:DUKE Extension Expressway. Thanks! Imzadi 1979 → 06:38, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MEX Extension Expressway moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, MEX Extension Expressway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Imzadi 1979 → 00:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DUKE Extension Expressway (June 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:GEOROAD, WP:GNG. Find more sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 03:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Savage Oozi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Savage Oozi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. EDM fan 2 (talk) 03:56, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gopeng-Kuala Kangsar Bypass moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Gopeng-Kuala Kangsar Bypass, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Imzadi 1979 → 13:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DUKE Extension Expressway moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, DUKE Extension Expressway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Imzadi 1979 → 13:47, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That draft is not suitable for main space. It is simple to make it ready: all you need to do is add some citations. Until you can do that, it will be moved back to draft space. Imzadi 1979 → 13:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Home entertainment logos[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Home entertainment logos indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Klang Valley Expressway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northport.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. AnimationObjectShow (talk) 09:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kuala Lumpur North Dispersal Expressway moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Kuala Lumpur North Dispersal Expressway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kuala Lumpur North Dispersal Expressway moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Kuala Lumpur North Dispersal Expressway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 16:36, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Toll rates of the North–South Expressway[edit]

Information icon Hello, AnimationObjectShow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Toll rates of the North–South Expressway, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Juru–Sungai Dua Bypass[edit]

Information icon Hello, AnimationObjectShow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Juru–Sungai Dua Bypass, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gopeng–Kuala Kangsar Bypass[edit]

Information icon Hello, AnimationObjectShow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gopeng–Kuala Kangsar Bypass, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Toll rates of the North–South Expressway[edit]

Hello, AnimationObjectShow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Toll rates of the North–South Expressway".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gopeng–Kuala Kangsar Bypass[edit]

Hello, AnimationObjectShow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Gopeng–Kuala Kangsar Bypass".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Juru–Sungai Dua Bypass[edit]

Hello, AnimationObjectShow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Juru–Sungai Dua Bypass".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:39, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kuala Lumpur North Dispersal Expressway[edit]

Information icon Hello, AnimationObjectShow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kuala Lumpur North Dispersal Expressway, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kuala Lumpur North Dispersal Expressway[edit]

Hello, AnimationObjectShow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kuala Lumpur North Dispersal Expressway".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AnimationObjectShow&oldid=1136294043"