User talk:Anselmo00

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Anselmo00!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anselmo00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not a span but I'm trying to stop the page deletion back and forth Anselmo00 (talk) 13:56, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 14:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

....[edit]

I dunno what you're doing or what your past account is but it's fairly obvious you're not new and I suggest you stop messing with drafts. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Italian wine podcast[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Italian wine podcast, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Italian wine podcast[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Italian wine podcast, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Hello Anselmo00. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Italian wine podcast, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anselmo00. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anselmo00|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:37, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi the creator of the page did it is @Jdtw2022 Anselmo00 (talk) 13:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Anselmo00. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 13:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I don't personally have that for this but the creator of the page has it @Jdtw2022 Anselmo00 (talk) 13:52, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your sockpuppet account, Jdtw2022, declared a conflict of interest. So, you'll excuse us if we don't believe you. --Yamla (talk) 14:06, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 13:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi don't have personal relation but I saw that the creator has it on his talk page @Jdtw2022 @Athaenara Anselmo00 (talk) 13:53, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, really? Explain this comment then: both sites were created by me and my colleagues can you please tell me how to grant the permission? Anselmo00 (talk) 16:03, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Athaenara I actually can I didn't know how there should be a conflict of interest so I impersonated jdtw and then helped him but I don't know him I'm trying to move this page forward which seems to be stuck if not I can safely move on to another goal. Simple as that Anselmo00 (talk) 14:05, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Anselmo00: I doubt anyone will unblock you unless you (1) abandon your efforts to promote your blog or podcast or whatever it is, and (2) post an actual {{unblock}} request which specifies what you intend to do to help build and improve this encyclopedia. – Athaenara ✉ 20:30, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I read books in the kindle and in the kindle there is this great function that when you mash on a word you get the grammatical definition, translation and also the wikipedia page and they seem mostly correct but sometimes they seem wrong and many in my opinion are missing so I would like to contribute to wikipedia in this way @Athaenara@Praxidicae Anselmo00 (talk) 07:39, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]