User talk:Anss123

Post any question you have for me here...

Okay I can post any question here? Is it just my imagination, or are you borderline retarded? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.58.75.4 (talk) 20:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
That is my question —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.58.75.4 (talk) 20:54, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm sure am, anything else? Oh, and please sign you questions.--Anss123 (talk) 21:00, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey what's the point of having your own page if people could edit it and diss you whenever you want? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.223.175.24 (talk) 04:03, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Eventually, those who diss will get caught.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:06, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

And if they continue, blocked.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Point? What is the point of anything? Having a user page makes me feel important and loved. Without it I would just be one of the numbered masses.--Anss123 (talk) 16:39, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

SimCity Societies

SimCity Societies has been announced as the next game in the SimCity series, therefore it's only logical that it would be mentioned after SimCity 4 and before the mentioning of the Sims series. It hasn't received the "special mentioning" as you've said in your revert message - it was included in chronological order after the mentioning of SimCity 4. I've included this discussion on the SimCity talkpage. Poetic^X_contribs 14:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

I'm off on a biz trip when I got the notice about NFU on the Channel F image. Thanks for taking care of that for me, it likely would have been killed by the time I got to it. Maury 19:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Good to hear. You had given the source and that was the only thing I couldn't write myself.--Anss123 22:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Three-revert rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Halo 2. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. — Satori Son 21:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Noted--Anss123 22:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sim city map 1 amiga.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Sim city map 1 amiga.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sound Blaster Org.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sound Blaster Org.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SimCity for CDTV.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:SimCity for CDTV.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

GiB

“It’s rear to see…”? I’m not sure what “rear” means, but I think I agree with you. I’m trying to address this issue here at MOSNUM#Follow current literature Greg L (talk) 22:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

This Guy is GAY!

Dude you are a fag that info I posted about Macintosh is true. They are very gay just like you! Get a life Noob! I am better than you. I bet when you turn on the lamp in your shack called an "apartment, you get sunburn. Oh ya Gay days at Disney is June 6-8. Youre Welcome! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aquietlittlecat (talk • contribs) 15:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I’m gay? Cool. Learn something new every day.--Anss123 (talk) 16:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

AT Attachment

Hey! Thanks for your edits. It's good to see a few other people taking an interest in that page. Jeh (talk) 23:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks :) Not that I added much. If you wrote that page, good work.--Anss123 (talk) 23:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I recently heavily revamped the "history and terminology" section up through the "parallel ATA" heading, and I did the original versions of the "master and slave clarification" and subsequent sections through "one operation at a time", though most of those were reworded by someone else a little while ago. I've also been defending the page against erroneous information, which is why I noticed your edit so quickly. Related to that, I've also been busy on the talk page, more busy than I'd like to be, in fact... Jeh (talk) 00:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Halo 2 XP patch

i was wondering has any body u know got a halo 2 XP patch. seriously i getting fed up with vista this and vista that it needs to fuck off.

Why bother with Halo 2? The game is a step back from Halo 1 in graphics, music and storytelling. Anyhow, you can get a patch here.--Anss123 (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Than you so fucking much man even though i'm not gay(true) i'd kiss ya(just kidding) but seriously i'm so fucking happy man i hope it works... and for your sake you'd better hope so as well cause if it doesn't i will hunt you down and kill you >:(

just kidding

it isn't a rar and wen i change it to 1 i can't open it. do u know why??? <:( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.238.244 (talk) 11:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Try this zip file then.--Anss123 (talk) 13:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

thanks u don't know wat this means to me unless you u are a mind reader. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.236.16 (talk) 09:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much, Thankyou so much,

seriously thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.236.16 (talk) 09:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Flagged Revs Trial

I noticed your response on the straw poll for the flagged revs trial and am a bit confused because you added a weak oppose, yet appear to be supporting flagged revs in your reasoning. I was wondering if you were aware of this, or it was simply a mistake. Thanks, —Nn123645 (talk) 08:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Anss123. You have new messages at Nn123645's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wintel

Your arguing was wrong - see my edit summary. And please do not remove the link again, the article has too few sources and any external info (in this case through an externa link) is valuable. Thank you!--Kozuch (talk) 13:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Invert selection

I didn't check this one for Vista before adding that. :-) Can you check for Windows 7 as well? - xpclient ^Talk 04:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

I do not see it in Win7.--Anss123 (talk) 07:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Just to double clarify, you mean it's removed in Windows 7 but present in Windows Vista? - xpclient ^Talk 14:15, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes.--Anss123 (talk) 15:23, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Added to PCs talk page, instead of the article

I added to the talk page, because I am gearing up for editing the IBM PC Article End to End to remove all of the GLARING factual inaccuracies, to improve its quality so that someone will be able to wikifiy it and have a more accurate/factual basis to start from. Thanks for noticing, and I am deep in citations and references 69.232.192.143 (talk) 08:52, 20 February 2011 (UTC)--

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Anss123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Anss123. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)