User talk:AntaineNZ
Welcome![edit]
Hello, AntaineNZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
- Always sign your posts on talk pages with
~~~~so others will know who left which comments. - The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
- How to edit a page and write a great article
- The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
- The handy Manual of Style
- And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Happy editing!
-- Sango123 17:16, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page. :)
FWBO / WBO[edit]
Its unfortunate that this article is continually vandalised to give an unbalanced view of the FWBO / WBO. It is particularly interesting that there is no acknowledgement of the explicit homophobia in the critique of the FWBO.
The underlying sense is that homosexuality is incompatible with the spiritual life. I dont think wikipedia should be used as a vehicle for bigotry. There are several positions on the issue of Sangarakshita and sex, the only one given a presence here is the heterosexist / homophobic one: men that have sex with men are either predators or victims. Equally odd, is the invisibility of women in this discourse on sexual matters and abuse of power. Are they absent from the FWBO / WBO? Or Neutered sexless creatures, requiring activation by a male?
Bigotry and manifesto are devaluing Wikipedia's worth
Are you socking?[edit]
What's this? Are you using multiple IPs? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 05:39, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
SPI[edit]
SPI-case filed: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AntaineNZ Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 06:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
You may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)