This article needs attention from an expert in topic name. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article.WikiProject Topic name may be able to help recruit an expert.(September 2011)
This page may be too long to read and navigate comfortably. Consider splitting content into sub-articles, condensing it, or adding subheadings. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page.(September 2011)
This user page needs to be updated. Please help update this user page to reflect recent events or newly available information. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. (September 2011)
This article may be unbalanced towards certain viewpoints. Please improve the article by adding information on neglected viewpoints, or discuss the issue on the talk page.(September 2011)
This article appears to be slanted towards recent events. Please try to keep recent events in historical perspective and add more content related to non-recent events.(September 2011)
This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. Please remove or replace such wording and instead of making proclamations about a subject's importance, use facts and attribution to demonstrate that importance.(September 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This user page needs to be updated. Please help update this user page to reflect recent events or newly available information. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. (September 2011)
This article's lead sectionmay be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article.(September 2011)
The truthfulness of this article has been questioned. It is believed that some or all of its content may constitute a hoax. Please carefully verify any reliable sources used to support the claims in the article or section, and add reliable sources for any uncited claims. If the claims cannot be reliably sourced, consider placing the article at articles for deletion and/or removing the section in question. For blatant hoaxes, use {{db-hoax}} to identify it for speedy deletion instead. Further information and discussion may be on the article's talk page.(September 2011)
This page or section may contain link spam masquerading as content. Spam on Wikipedia consists of external links mainly intended to promote a website. If you are familiar with the content of the external links, please help by removing promotional links in accordance with Wikipedia:External links.(September 2011)
Hi - did you read Mound builder (people)#Alternative explanations before fact-tagging? Although I think 'European settlers' needs revising as this was a common opinion still in the 19th century, it's easy to cite and although I leave fact tags at times I also try to find sources where I know I can.Dougweller (talk) 19:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Umf... I was going to say something about how your political standing is made obvious by your user boxes.... But now I feel queasy from seeing the box above filled with all that stuff, and I've forgotten what I was going to say...--NecrㅎШeamö 04:39, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your recent edit regarding Canadian contribtutions to Country music[edit]
or lack thereof.
I had tried to address this some time ago, but did not want to get in to an edit war.
Thanks again.
Steve Pastor (talk) 19:10, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
