User talk:Aquakeeper14

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

The Clik Clik[edit]

Hello Aquakeeper14,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, The Clik Clik, may be copied from http://www.myspace.com/theclikclik/blog/446505766#!. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Clik Clik[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Clik Clik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Mr X 21:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sophie Wu[edit]

The article Sophie Wu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 03:29, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 1950[edit]

The information about the possible inaccuracy carbon dating after January 1, 1950, is interesting and noteworthy-- but where did you get that from? We really need a citation to some published work of some sort. Thanks. Mandsford 18:11, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that! I believe I have amended this now by adding two references. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. --Aquakeeper14 (talk) 16:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Xericeps) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Xericeps, Aquakeeper14!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I reduced the number of trivial Wikilinks: see WP:OVERLINK. Not every word needs a link, and most people don't click them anyway.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 04:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Françoise Nielly for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Françoise Nielly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Françoise Nielly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:17, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Group discussion on Category:Months in the 20th century articles[edit]

In that you've been a major contributor to the articles in Category:Months in the 20th century, you are invited to participate in a discussion among the contributors about a basic framework for the project, at [1] Mandsford 16:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]