User talk:Aravindkumararjunan1986

This is Aravindkumararjunan1986's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome![edit]

Hi Aravindkumararjunan1986! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unreferenced. Fails WP:NBOOK

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Aravindkumararjunan1986/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aravindkumararjunan1986! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rudra. Thulasidas moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Rudra. Thulasidas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Aravindkumararjunan1986/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Aravindkumararjunan1986. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Aravindkumararjunan1986/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rudra. Thulasidas (July 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Losipov was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More reliable sources are needed, as the sources used don't demonstrate notability. I'm sure there are better sources out there.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rudra. Thulasidas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Losipov (talk) 05:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Aravindkumararjunan1986/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Aravindkumararjunan1986. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Stun Siva, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 18:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: T.Suriavelan (September 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb is not a reliable source, because it is user edited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:T.Suriavelan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:56, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rudra. Thulasidas[edit]

Hello, Aravindkumararjunan1986. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rudra. Thulasidas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tik Tok (December 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tik Tok and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk to me! • contribs 23:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tik Tok has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tik Tok. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:58, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Harishankar Narayanan has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Harishankar Narayanan. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i add some more reference please check also the times of India is the fourth largest news paper in India please consider as reference. Aravindkumararjunan1986 (talk) 13:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Understood kindly check remaining articalthe Hindu and dtnext please. Aravindkumararjunan1986 (talk) 14:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Understood kindly check remaining articles example the Hindu and dtnext please. Aravindkumararjunan1986 (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I remove all times of india referance please check now. Aravindkumararjunan1986 (talk) 13:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Harishankar Narayanan has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Harishankar Narayanan. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harishankar Narayanan (January 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Either provide citations for early life or remove the section. I make no comment upon notability at this stage. I see you still feel some facts require more than one citation

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harishankar Narayanan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harishankar Narayanan (January 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harishankar Narayanan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello Aravindkumararjunan1986. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aravindkumararjunan1986. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aravindkumararjunan1986|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not get any payment are financial help for my edits. Mr Harishankar Narayananmy my favourite actor so I try not only him my previous contribution like suriavelan and rudhra thulasithas also my favouriteper sons I try for people should know about them. If you acceptor not I neverworry. Gud bye. Aravindkumararjunan1986 (talk) 12:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Harishankar Narayanan has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Harishankar Narayanan. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rudra. Thulasidas[edit]

Hello, Aravindkumararjunan1986. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rudra. Thulasidas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harishankar Narayanan (February 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Zoglophie was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: All the sources have scant mentions of him, which do not clear the WP:SIGCOV threshold required for Wikipedia. Times of India is not a reliable source, so it will not be considered.

Rejecting because multiple submissions didn't help to establish his notability.

zoglophie^•talk• 08:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:T.Suriavelan[edit]

Hello, Aravindkumararjunan1986. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "T.Suriavelan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]