User talk:Architect encyclopedia

Architect encyclopedia, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Architect encyclopedia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Barber Architect has been accepted[edit]

Peter Barber Architect, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cabrils (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Ely Architect (December 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alex Ely Architect and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alex Ely Architect, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Ely Architect (January 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alex Ely Architect and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alex Ely Architect, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:04, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alex Ely Architect[edit]

Hello, Architect encyclopedia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alex Ely Architect".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:32, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alex Ely has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alex Ely. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alex Ely has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alex Ely. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theroadislong Thanks for your comments. I’ve edited a number of the sources and removed the Wikipedia references. I am still getting Cite error messages and I’m not sure what is wrong. Are you able to help? Many thanks Architect encyclopedia (talk) 13:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alex Ely has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alex Ely. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alex Ely has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alex Ely. Thanks! Cabrils (talk) 22:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Architect encyclopedia. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Alex Ely, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Paul W (talk) 16:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]