User talk:Ardoc.team

Contested deletion: People for planet[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as being about a subject that was invented or for lack of asserted importance, because... Successive reports are warning us that our current methods are pushing life on earth out of balance, in particular through the use of polluting energy sources. That should be more than reason enough, don't you agree !? --Ardoc.team (talk) 04:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In A11, I read: The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify under Wikipedia's notability guidelines. --Ardoc.team (talk) 05:41, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why "People for planet" is important?

Meaning "people for planet", P4P is a term which people can refer to their willingness as a world community to take care of life on earth.

Using global warming in and of itself as a basis for creating an article does not satisfy the notability guideline, last I checked. -G.A.WILMBROKE [ USER / ALT / TALK / CONTRIBS ] 05:21, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain to me why Wikipedia.org has such an needlessly offensive notifications policy?[edit]

What I try to do is to reach out and create an open source reference to 'People for planet'.

Why I think this is important? Because we, people should care more about life on earth.

Is Wikipedia so ignorant about the urgency of this? As 'not being sponsored by industry or government', ... I wonder why Wiki would be so harsh, only giving negative comments, not making any positive suggestions at all. Does Wikipedia has a killer instinct for creative and caring language?

Thank you.

-- Ardoc.team (talk) 05:43, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is important, we need to live on this planet, but when will we start to admit it and take care?[edit]

In CSD A11 I read: The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify under Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

-- Ardoc.team (talk) 05:41, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Key word: Credibility. I have no reason to believe that it's a credible claim, and the way it's written looks to me like it's been coined by you or someone close. If another editor (note: editor - NOT the article creator) feels it's mistagged, they're more than welcome to fix it themselves. -G.A.WILMBROKE [ USER / ALT / TALK / CONTRIBS ] 05:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC), edited 05:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC). PS - please remember to sign your talkpage posts.[reply]

I re-tagged the article with appropriate CSD templates, please read them as multiple apply to this article. Please read about creating articles and if you'd like work on the article here. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 05:44, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are you saying please, that I need to give information on my user page, before I write any other content? How open source is that, please? -Ardoc.team (talk) 05:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

I am offering to move the article to your userspace so that you can work on it without the stringent requirements of the article space. The article space has much more stringent requirements than the user space does. Once the article is done, we can move it back here. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 05:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly disagree that this article should be tagged under CSD A11. For CSD A1 and CSD A7, I have more understanding of the reasons, but I could use some advice, please. --Ardoc.team (talk) 05:56, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of giving some pointers in your userspace as this article is likely to be deleted very soon. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 06:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever seen the 'Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy'? Remember where it was at stake where the planet earth was about to be deleted to build a new hyperspace gateway. This is about how I see what we are doing to ourselves... . --Ardoc.team (talk) 06:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ardoc.team, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as People for Planet, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -G.A.WILMBROKE [ USER / ALT / TALK / CONTRIBS ] 04:45, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from People for Planet, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. -G.A.WILMBROKE [ USER / ALT / TALK / CONTRIBS ] 05:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to People for Planet. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 05:20, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of People for Planet[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on People for Planet, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 05:40, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ardoc.team. You have new messages at User talk:Ardoc.team/People for Planet.
Message added 06:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 06:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?[edit]

Hello! Ardoc.team, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 06:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you Solarra, for this feedback. This is a way better way of communication, at least the way I see. - Ardoc.team 06:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Ardoc.team. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 07:56, 29 May 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Ardoc.team", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to imply that more than one person has access to this account. Shared accounts are not permitted. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am a single person, please. There are users who call themselves 'Arthur goes shopping'. How is 'team' less relevant than 'shopping'?

Ardoc.team (talk) 09:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Ardoc.team/sandbox (May 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ardoc.team/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 08:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Ardoc.team. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 08:27, 29 May 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Block[edit]

Corporate accounts are not allowed. Each person must create their own, strictly personal account. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am a single person, please. There are users who call themselves 'Arthur goes shopping'. How is 'team' less relevant than 'shopping'?

Ardoc.team (talk) 08:46, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am quite clearly a single person, as can be seen by my userpage, even though I sometimes indulge in enough shopping for an entire village. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 15:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Ardoc.team/sandbox[edit]

Hello Ardoc.team. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Ardoc.team/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:20, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]