User talk:Ariehardian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

{{unblock|reason=first of all, a thousand apologize about the article that I created yesterday. I think, there was a misunderstanding about my article. Qitep in Science is not a company but its an organization or an institute like other world organization similar to IUPAC. This organization is ASEAN organization that has a vision to make better future in education in ASEAN regional. So, the purpose of this article is to share with others about the history, the location, the vision, the mission, the goals, the programs, and so on.... Hopefully you permit me to continue my article....

thanks,
sincerely yours
Arie Hardian
}}




Welcome!

Hello, Ariehardian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as QITEP in Science, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! That's me! Have doubt? What I done? 06:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on QITEP in Science, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. That's me! Have doubt? What I done? 06:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at QITEP in Science[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please click here.

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 06:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with QITEP in Science. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 06:14, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at QITEP in Science, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 06:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to AIV[edit]

Hi Ariehardian, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported the issue of you removing speedy deletion templates to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 06:37, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently removing speedy deletion tags from the spam article you created, despite repeatedly being told that doing so was unacceptable, and for using Wikipedia only for advertising. It is possible that you came here thinking that using Wikipedia as a free advertising service was acceptable, but in fact that is contrary to policy, as must have been apparent once you received the deletion notice, which gave advertising as a reason for speedy deletion, as did the speedy deletion templates which you kept removing.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]