User talk:Aries90

Mulatto & Explicitly Mixed

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks.

If you believe the other commercial sites should be removed, I welcome you to do so. --JereKrischel 02:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Your wrong, again tell me why explicitly mixed can't be there but other non-yahoo webpage's can? Are you being biased? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aries90 (talk • contribs)

See Wikipedia:Spam. The links to explicitlymixed were linkspammed in to every article relating to multiracial people. This is clearly against Wikipedia policy. They were added with advertising copy attached to them, "tailored" to each article ("Made for the Blasian Experience" or "Made for the Mulatto Experience"), by three users (User:131.247.234.199, User:Liberalpunt, and yourself User:Aries90) - who given the common wording I now suspect to be either the same person or people in contact with eachother. I am not being biased - this is a clear issue of spam policy. Please feel free to add content, not just links. I'm sure you could be a valuable contributor to Wikipedia. --JereKrischel 21:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

listen, JereKrischel is right. Go back and read everything that you wrote to us about this issue. You seem so motivated to link these pages to explicitly mixed. Think to yourself, "Is it really worth it?". You can still add any information you want to the article( minus the links). Would it make that big of a difference if the links weren't there. Bobcheezy 17:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC), the peacekeeper

Ready to assist

I read your post on my user page. From What I have seen. The user you described to me wants his links on the page because he thinks they are suitable, and the article does not need new links. This isn't helping anyone, because if someone writes something on the article, you have to include a link to the page where you got the information. There is not a reason why the links should be removed. if you need my support or advice in this conflict, just contact me again. Bobcheezy 02:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC)