User talk:ArizonaArt

ArizonaArt, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ArizonaArt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Josias Joesler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revival. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sarai Sherman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chrysler Museum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of films shot in Arizona, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chasing Rainbows. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Mark Voris) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mark Voris, ArizonaArt!

Wikipedia editor Zamaster4536 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Move refs into ref section.

To reply, leave a comment on Zamaster4536's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cecil Moore (architect)

added links pointing to Moderne, Streamline and Modern

Jack Van Ryder

added links pointing to Powder River, Bisbee and Regionalism

Mark Voris

added links pointing to Franklin, Regionalism and Franklin College

Pete Martinez

added links pointing to Elko, Will James and Regionalism

Louise Norton

added links pointing to Prescott and American

Charles Bolsius

added a link pointing to Kerr House

Richard Oseran

added a link pointing to American

Stanford Stevens

added a link pointing to Regionalism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tucson, Arizona, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ArizonaArt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jack Maul

added links pointing to Representational and Arthur Brown

Charles Bolsius

added a link pointing to Kerr House

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lucy Drake Marlow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carnegie Museum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ArizonaArt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of motels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Clif and Lou Sawyer

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c81j992c/entire_text/. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ArizonaArt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ArizonaArt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Tucson Modernism Week moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tucson Modernism Week, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 10:21, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tucson Modernism Week has been accepted

Tucson Modernism Week, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 17:01, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Nice short article. Especially as this is all about the visual, it is too bad the article doesn't have an image or two or three, including a logo or poster from the Tucson Modernism Week organization. FYI, if you can identify an image of theirs that you'd like to use in the article, I bet they would be interested/willing to share it for use in the Wikipedia article, and that could be done (it is slightly, but not very, complicated to get an organization to give permission in the proper formal way, I have found... could say more).

Hmm, i wonder if any of the other artists mentioned in the article have Wikipedia articles, so trying wikilinks here: Bernard J. Friedman, William Kirby Lockard, William Wilde, Sylvia Wilde, Taro Akutagawa, Tom Gist, Bob Swaim, Nicholas Sakellar. Hmm, currently the Bob Swaim and William Wilde ones are bluelinks and should be wikilinked in the article (but hmm, i see the links appear to go to some other persons of those name), the others show as redlinks currently. Likely some or all of the artists are wikipedia-notable though, don't you think? The article could show them as redlinks, indicating that an article is needed (and use redlinks William Wilde (artist) and Bob Swaim (artist) rather than linking to the wrong articles). I hope you don't mind me having commented on just about everything here on your Talk page. cheers, --Doncram (talk,contribs) 19:18, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

P.S. Hey I see that there is coverage in Wikipedia already of Bernard Friedman, at least, at Hirsh's Shoes#Bernard Friedman, architect (which I found by browsing away to the Tucson Historic Preservation Foundation and then browsing away from there looking for any image available for it). An exercise for you (like I suggest for a different case in a section below): put {{anchor|Bernard J. Friedman}} into that article just above the section about him, and then change Bernard J. Friedman (currently a redlink) into a redirect to Hirsh's Shoes#Bernard J. Friedman. And wikilink Friedman, at least, in the Tucson Modernism Week article. Oh, and further, put "Category:Artists from Tucson, Arizona onto the redirect page itself (I don't know if you know you can do that), so that "Bernard J. Friedman" will show up in the category.  :) --Doncram (talk,contribs) 19:36, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

The Charles Bolsius House and NRHP

Hi ArizonaArt, i visited your new page The Charles Bolsius House as it popped up in my notices, probably because you must have linked to some article I created, perhaps very long ago. I want to say: it looks great, and I'm happy you are on board contributing. I myself mainly develop articles about National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-listed places, which this is. I see your interest is in doing more in the Tucson area, great!

Hey, I would usually add to, edit, a new NRHP-related page like this that i encountered, but can't contribute to it right now. I hope you won't mind that I'm mentioning the page and yourself at the Talk page of WikiProject NRHP, and perhaps 1 or 2 others might come by. Again what you've done looks great, and I hope you keep interested and keep up the good work! --Doncram (talk,contribs) 19:40, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi ArizonaArt, I see that in the past you have edited a bunch then gone away, so I worry you might not see/read this. I would have sent an email to you, but there is no "send email to user" button enabled on your User page.

I wanted to say I am happy to see that several other editors did take and interest and develop the Charles Bolsius House article. Their discussion, over at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Register_of_Historic_Places#The_Charles_Bolsius_House, went back and forth about whether this place is NRHP-listed or not. From various documents they found and cited, they concluded it is the separately NRHP-listed place named "Site No. HD 5-26" in the NRHP naming system, with address 5495 E. Fort Lowell Rd., Tucson. And they added to the article. It would be nice if you could say "thanks" or something over there, but again maybe you won't see this.

Further, I see on National Register of Historic Places listings in Pima County, Arizona that there are at least eight other separately-listed places on E. Fort Lowell Rd. in Tucson, and a couple more on N. Craycroft Rd. Most of these show as "redlinks", i.e. there is no article yet at that name, nor has the link been redirected to coverage within some big article. One example is Post Trader's Storehouse (which currently shows as a redlink), listed December 13, 1978, with refnum #78003368, at 5354 E. Fort Lowell Rd. This is good news for you maybe, because the presumption is then that these topics are worthy of coverage in Wikipedia, so if you develop some more articles they will almost certainly be accepted / appreciated / kept / not deleted (which sometimes happens to new articles). You and/or other editors could possibly choose to cover some or many of them all in one big article with a section for each one. And if there is enough info available for a good article on a given one, it can have its own article too with more info, while still summarized in the big article.

Again, I'm glad you're on the case for covering historic places in Tucson! Doncram (talk,contribs) 03:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the throughful note. Regarding the naming I contacted the SHPO and they confirmed the name had been updated with a new inventory form some time ago. I am working on updated photos that will provide better clarity of these buildings. I will def. continue to work on articles for Fort Lowell and Tucson. Many of the listed sites are also designated by the city of Tucson with more formal names. ArizonaArt (talk) 15:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Okay, good, great, then I'm glad I made the overture, whew! I'll try to revisit the article soon if I can. I'm also happy to hear you've been in contact with your SHPO, and, if you'd interested or willing, I'd like to chat about some data corrections and info-sharing with them. Along lines I & others have been interested in doing with almost all the separate SHPOs, but no one has taken forward with Arizona. Later, --Doncram (talk,contribs) 21:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy to help in any way I can. ArizonaArt (talk) 01:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Did you happen to add the new inventory form as a reference to the article, I wonder? If you'd like me to, email a copy of it to me (using my "email this user" link).

I noticed you added external links to the Charles Bolsius House article, which is fine and good to do. Copy of them:

• [1] CharlesBolsius.com
• [2] Work in Old Fort Lowell <-- link bad, goes to "Page not found", but searching at top right there on "Bolsius" gives a couple alternative pages that might be intended instead?
• [3] Old Fort Lowell: <--- goes to "scribd" website (a pay site?) which has a copy of May 1938 Desert Magazine, but I can't scroll down to any relevant article there... do you happen to have a PDF of the full thing? Or know the title of the article within it that is relevant? It would be better to cite the Desert Magazine article... I could help get that via Wikipedia Library perhaps?
• [4] Biographical Information <--- goes to AskArt page titled "Artist Biography & Facts: Charles William Bolsius"

One or more of those links don't work for me though. And then I wonder if the first one should be on the Charles Bolsius article also or instead, and then I see that it is there.... external links there are:

• CharlesBolsius.com
• Work in Old Fort Lowell <-- the bad link
• Old Fort Lowell:
• ASU Kerr House
• Biographical information

So apparently you copied from there, but copied from what is displayed rather than copying from the source code. Hmm, the links at the Charles Bolsius article should certainly be fixed up better, and the links at the Charles Bolsius House article should probably be kept only if they have information specifically about the Charles Bolsius House, IMHO.... your comment?

Cheers, --Doncram (talk,contribs) 18:54, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of LeaChar House for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LeaChar House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeaChar House until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MB 05:10, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Hey, ArizonaArt, I hope this nomination for deletion and the discussion that took place don't bum you out too much. User:MB is a good editor and is not out to get you or anything, and I can see their point, although I also recall being quite miffed in the long-ago past when articles I had started were nominated for deletion at AFD (now it wouldn't bother me if it happens). I see the result of the AFD was that LeaChar House was changed to be a redirect to Charles Bolsius. Perhaps an improvement upon that is possible: if there is a separate section or even just a sentence or two about the LeaChar House in that article, then the redirect target could go to that place instead. Logistically, that would be done by putting {{anchor|Lea Char House}} into the article at the desired target location, and changing the redirect to go to "Charles Bolsius#LeaChar House" rather than just to "Charles Bolsius".

It has often happened for me, that I thought there was enough info available for a separate article, which I started but then found there wasn't a lot to say. And then often it is better to cover the topic within an already-existing article, and to redirect from the article i started. If more info does emerge and/or I have more time to develop what info I do have, then I would restore the article I started by going back to and editing the version of the article just before the redirect was put in place. If an AFD discussion has happened and a consensus was established by others that the topic should be redirected, I am still allowed to do that, as long as I do have substantial additional development. (If in doubt about whether you have enough new stuff, ask for others' advice/help: ask at the talk page of the redirect target (Talk:Charles Bolsius in this case), feel free to ask me personally, or ask at wp:TEAHOUSE, or ask at wt:NRHP). I hope this might be helpful to you. cheers, --Doncram (talk,contribs) 18:22, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

March 2023

Your edit to Bernard J. Friedman has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 19:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Ramada House. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerry Blackwell House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, ArizonaArt. Thank you for your work on Rosequist Gallery. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 01:04, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your articles on Arizona art, artists & galleries

Hello! I sometimes work at New Page Patrol and noticed several of your contributions on Arizona art, artists and galleries. The articles always are well written and referenced. However, I also noticed that the citations in the references/notes are usually offline. This is fine and allowed, but it would help expedite the NPP review process if your citations had links to the articles so they can be verified, and also to give our readership the possibility of going to the original sources for more in-depth information on the subject. I'm assuming you are doing the research in a library with hard copies(?)

I was just starting to review Ann Spencer (artist) and check the referencing. I was able to access those from the Tucson Citizen on Newspapers.com as well as NewspaperArchive.com. The URLs from those would improve your citations. Do you know about the Wikipedia library? WP:LIBRARY You can apply for a "library card" to have access to numerous resources, including those two newspaper archives for free. (Sometimes there is a waiting list for particular resources. The WP Library has been such a great help for me, and I thought you may be interested. Happy editing, ArizonaArt! Netherzone (talk) 21:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the note and recommendations. I will definitely apply and work to make those improvements. ArizonaArt (talk) 19:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 261 Gallery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ArizonaArt. Thank you for your work on The LeaChar House. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ArizonaArt. Thank you for your work on El Callejón. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Jerry Blackwell House article

Hi there! I was reading your article on the Jerry Blackwell House and you mentioned "steal glass window walls." What is "steal glass?" Did you mean "steel glass?" What's that? Thanks for the very interesting article. I hope I can learn about those walls. Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 08:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Ruiz II

Hello, ArizonaArt

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Alpha3031, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Daniel Ruiz II, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Alpha3031}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Ruiz II for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Ruiz II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Ruiz II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC)