User talk:Ark25

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ark25! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gimme danger (talk) 06:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Ernst and Young[edit]

Please do not cite policies and guidelines to me, especially when I have linked to it in the open discussion thread regarding this topic. My reply to your revert can be found at the talkpage: Please see Talk:Ernst & Young/Archives/2013#Stroescu case and reply there instead of reverting. Wikipedia policy dictates that only three reverts can be made by any one editor in 24 hours. Please take this as a notice regarding 3RR as well as a hint towards discussing issues rather than reverting. Regards. Woody (talk) 23:58, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Fudzilla.com[edit]

A tag has been placed on Fudzilla.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JCutter (talk) 00:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a computing news website that, between others (the register, ars technica), I personally read a lot. Has lots of readers, so I thought it's notable enough. I don't care about any wikipedia vs fudzilla "fight", as the inquirer article suggest. Where should I indicate why its subject is important or significant? I can't identify such information on The Inquirer article, for example. Thanks Ark25 (talk) 00:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what the site is, and I too don't care about any old fights (only learned about it after reading your inquirer link), but the problem remains that there is nothing to assert that it is a notable website in your article. A site can't be notable simply because it's been deleted from Wikipedia before. If you want to save or re-write the article it should meet these guidelines. Regards. JCutter (talk) 02:14, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

notable website: "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works". At moment I can't find any other reference on it, other than the inquirer article (and that one seems trivial by the way). Ah well, in a few years the site will be notable, I guess. Regards Ark25 (talk) 02:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stub template categories[edit]

Hi, this message is to inform you that there is a thread at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stub sorting#Stub template categories concerning a few of your recent edits. Your participation and comments are welcome. Thank you, –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 06:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Angelli[edit]

I took the liberty of changing a page you created (Angelli) from a disambig to a redirect, because the correct surname of Marella Angelli is in fact Agnelli. If you think I fucked up, feel free to revert my edits. ^________^ Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 17:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry I'm not touchy about my edits. Thanks for noticing me. I think it needs a revert, since there are 2 distinct items containing "Angelli" in the name. Cheers ! Ark25 (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wait, I think it can be left as it is now, I have no idea at all if the Marella Angelli redirect makes any sense. sorry for the confusion -- Ark25 (talk) 17:54, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that many people might type Angelli, instead of Agnelli, to refer to Marella, you can revert my edit and write that Angelli can refer to Euterebra angelli, but it can also be a (common?) misnomer for Marella Agnelli... Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 18:39, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who knows? I'm not italian, have not idea if they type Angelli instead of Agnelli. I can see tho that Agnelli is a common name used by many, that makes me believe the Marella Angelli redirect does not make much sense - otherwise you would have redirects for the other people named Agnelli (sorry for bad english by the way). So, no, no need to revert, things look just fine at the moment. -- Ark25 (talk) 18:45, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, they don't "type Angelli instead of Agnelli", but rather we ignorami, who are not native speakers of Italian, easily confuse them. "Angelli" or "Angeli" would probably have to do with angels (but probably be pronounced ahn-GALE-lee or ahn-GAY-lee rather than an-JELL-eye), while "Agnelli" probably has to do with lambs, and is pronounced roughly "ahn-YELL-lee.
--Jerzy•t 21:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, actually probably "ah-NYALE-lee". And i see that, just above, i recapitulated a PDQ Bach joke about "Angus Dei, what a cow!" Like i said, i remain
Truly your ignoramus, --Jerzy•t 22:28, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, i misunderstood you as saying you didn't understand Italian orthography and had been surprised that "Agnelli" wasn't a typo! But from the next section, it appears that you're fairly fluent, and that i, who am not, have no insight to offer you. I'm embarrassed by my exceedingly ignorant intrusion!
--Jerzy•t 03:06 & 04:20, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Pagina companie[edit]

Salut, am fost sfatuit sa te contactez in vederea adaugarii unei contributii pentru o companie fara sa para self-promotion sau publicitate, la fel cum este http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zahărul_Oradea

Este vorba despre compania FiresQ. Crezi ca ma poti ajuta? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.127.164.29 (talk) 20:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salutare ! Sigur, mi-ar face plăcere să te ajut. În primul rând este nevoie de ceva articole de ziar despre companie. Altfel compania nu este notabilă, iar cum Wikipedia nu este un catalog al tuturor firmelor existente, rezultă că fără notabilitate articolul va fi şters. Eu aş zice că, dacă firma are o cifră de afaceri undeva peste un milion de dolari/euro pe an, atunci şansele există. Dacă nu, atunci probabil că nici măcar nu se va obosi vreun ziar să facă articol despre firmă. Ark25 (talk) 21:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Draga variants[edit]

Taking a guess at what you'd have had in mind in including the list of variants in the Disambiguation page Draga, i split that material (which doesn't belong on a Dab page) into 3 new pages that i mention in Talk:Draga#"See also" secn. Your input on that talk page could help determine the fate of those 3 pages and their content.
--Jerzy•t 04:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot ! Ark25 (talk) 21:56, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sacramento[edit]

Some time ago you expressed your opinion that Sacramento, California should be at Sacramento and inquired about guidelines for naming cities. For the latter, please see WP:NC:CITY#United States. I agree with you about the rename and implicit change to that guideline. Are you still interested in pursuing this change? If so, please indicate accordingly at Talk:Sacramento, California. --Born2cycle (talk) 00:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply ! I posted my opinion there. — Ark25 (talk) 15:59, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roca (company)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Roca (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gmcbjames (talk) 18:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dacia[edit]

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient Dacia. Would you like to join the WikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to these topics. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 23:25, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of William Goad[edit]

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Secret ^account 04:30, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I deleted it. The weight of the negative statements against the flimsy (romainain) source made it a BLP violation. Here are some better sources if you would like to start again 1 2 3 4 Cheers--Guerillero | My Talk 04:46, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Secret: Attack? what attack? I just cited the sources, I have only used the statements already in the newspapers. I haven't made any statement on my own. Furthermore, according to your logic, pages like Jeffrey Dahmer should be deleted because it contains statements attacking people. And what nomination are you talking about? The page was speedily deleted a long time ago, it was never nominated for deletion.

@Guerillero: Well, the problem is that I can't really remember what sources I used. The romanian newspaper, Evenimentul zilei was citing english newspapers. I think I have added BBC references too. Anyways, is there any chance you can restore the page (somewhere in my user space) so I can expand it? Thanks. — Ark25 (talk) 06:37, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, to rewrite it. But I need the article to see the sources, and also to rephrase it. If you don't want to restore it into my user space, then please send it to me by email. — Ark25 (talk) 21:14, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a copy of the article, but the article was deleted for obvious WP:BLP concerns. In recreating the article, you must look at the sources closely and get f the most reliable sources for the subject, like the sources Guerillero provided. Also follow our neutral point of view, which the old article had issues with, don't use that Romanian source again as it doesn't seem to be independent of the subject and with dubious claims. That's why the article was speedy deleted without much of an argument and never restored back in DRV. You really need to be careful writing about the subject as he's still a living person. Thanks Secret ^account 16:01, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are lots of Google templates like {{Google RGSE}} and {{Find sources}} that may help you find reliable sources. WP:SET has a lot of information about search techniques and useful sources. LittleBen (talk) 04:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transliteration in searching[edit]

Hi, Ark25. I left an answer for you at Transliteration in searching. Best regards. LittleBen (talk) 04:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just added another reply. LittleBen (talk) 08:11, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of most successful crowdfunding projects, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scanner and Rob Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

dates
years
commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

This even applies for infoboxes.

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 10:52, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mess around with my indentation[edit]

My indentation is generally intentionally and nearly always complies with WP:Indentation. So please don't mess around with it like you did here [1]. I was replying to the first post, not to AdiJapan, as should be obvious from my post. Nil Einne (talk) 12:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Archive.is headache. Thank you. Tito☸Dutta 18:17, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here [[[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Archive.is_headache]]. I mistakenly added "incident" Tito☸Dutta 23:09, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Special Barnstar
	This script User:Ark25/RefScript has potential to become script of the year. I do not know why it has not been highlighted. -- Tito☸Dutta 07:26, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you create a drag and drop option like this? You can upload the HTML/Javascript file anywhere including Google Drive. Tito☸Dutta 07:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have created an advertisement in my userspace too to promote it, you may see it if you try to edit my talk page or here. That's all I can do. Tito☸Dutta 07:44, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is a new message at my talk page. Tito☸Dutta 18:55, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback message from Tito Dutta[edit]

Hello, Ark25. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Alternative.
Message added 11:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You were directly mentioned in this post. . . and I was thinking I have been getting too old to feel excited about new things. Tito☸Dutta 11:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RefScript / WebRef[edit]

Hi, Ark25. Nice script. I had a similar idea, but I'm using the DOM of the web pages instead of the HTML. My script is more complicated, you can see it here: User:V111P/js/WebRef. I'm only now introducing it on the English Wikipedia, though I wrote it last year for the Bulgarian Wikipedia. :) --V111P (talk) 15:37, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Script[edit]

Salut,

Mersi pentru mesaj. Nu-ți face griji în legătură cu exprimarea. E foarte tare dacă merge chestia asta nouă, o să o încerc în următoarele săptămâni, pentru că momentan nu am timp și nici internet așa de mult, și nici nu am probleme cu funcționarea actuală. Necesitatea este mama invoației :))

Numai bine și pe curând. --Mihai (talk) 16:38, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Ark25/RefScript[edit]

User:Ark25/RefScript, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ark25/RefScript and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ark25/RefScript during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:13, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk page guidelines are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Your persistent efforts to get approval for spamming article talk pages with external links are becoming tedious. Consensus is against you. Stop beating the dead horse. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon - Minor point: W:Talk page guidelines is a guide, not an article. I can't see how the topic I posted was unrelated, since I asked the others if my actions are ok in the light of WP:TPG. And I started the topic on the talk page of WP:TPG.

Consensus is marked by addressing legitimate concerns held by editors. Calling someone a spammer without having evidence to support the claim is not a legitimate concern. — Ark25 (talk) 19:54, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where/How do I run your script? :-)[edit]

I have a link from Huffington Post, and I'd like to convert it into the Wikipedia reference format. Is there a link or URL I can click, enter the HuffPost URL, and it will generate the code? (I didn't see it yet, if so.) I'm not savvy enough (yet) to take your Java script program and run it myself. Thanks! :-) Benefac (talk) 05:33, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Active?[edit]

Are you active these days? --Tito☸Dutta 15:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Titodutta: sure. Did you manage to make the script work for you? For me it works - I just drag it in the bookmarks toolbar and it's working. By the way, if you have the time, you might be interested to say something at Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 3. — Ark25 (talk) 16:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I tested it twice. On Oct 3, I went to bangalore to join a Wiki-conference, and my Wiki-energy is very low specially because of this discussion. Ya I was thinking to resume that refscript discussion, that's why I posted here. --Tito☸Dutta 16:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Titodutta: Hmm, that's a very interesting debate, can we talk about it in private a little bit? I have sent you an e-mail. Two, in fact, because I omitted to specify my address in the first one. There is plenty of time for RefScript. And in the future, when you open/participate on such interesting topics, please let me know about them. — Ark25 (talk) 17:28, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have not received any email (spam, trash checked). It is the second time in this month when I did not receive email Please resend or respond to the email I just sent to you. --Tito☸Dutta 17:41, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Got your email now. Goona read it soon. --Tito☸Dutta 17:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. --Tito☸Dutta 17:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move[edit]

There is an informal requested move here, please consider participating: User_talk:Titodutta/Condensed_proposed_roadmap_for_Wikimedia_work_in_India#Informal_requested_move --Tito☸Dutta 20:29, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Graciella Carvalho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazilian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback message from Tito Dutta[edit]

Hello, Ark25. You have new messages at Bgwhite's talk page.
Message added 07:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Feeling tired, but check this tool. Tito☸Dutta 07:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Titodutta: very nice tool, thanks a lot! Where is the feedback for this tool? It has an error with the " ' " character, in the Quick start, it doesn't show articles in the list like Torre de' Passeri or Tot ce e bun tre' să dispară - it will show Torre de, Tot ce e bun tre etc. — Ark25 (talk) 21:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of cyber-attacks, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Target and Subway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tempo (retailer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

7digital missing format description[edit]

Hi there, I added some info (in bottom section '7digital.com' about the formats they currently sell :) Thanks Llamalady28 (talk) 14:24, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsement request[edit]

Please see this and if please possible endorse it User_talk:Titodutta#WMIN_Infrastructure_Scholarship_endorsements --Tito☸Dutta 11:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mundo Reader, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tablet PC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Șerpeni (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Șerpeni (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Safiel (talk) 03:49, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bălțata (dezambiguizare), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bălțata. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alexandrovna

added a link pointing to Maria Alexandrovna

Chernykh

added a link pointing to Dmitry Chernykh

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greets![edit]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Ark25, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing,
Tito☸Dutta 13:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

RefScript[edit]

Hello, I've added a bit of code to your bookmarklet so it can generate a basic cite from google books. Would you like it? Here? Email? Let me know. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 05:07, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@No More Mr Nice Guy: hello pal, sorry to answer so late, I had quite little time for Wikipedia lately. Thanks for making that code and sure any addition is welcomed, can you add the code into User:Ark25/RefScript#The script ? I will preserve it in my main source code file and I will make sure it will be kept in the next versions of RefScript. — Ark25 (talk) 19:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. After working on it a bit I came to the conclusion it would be simpler to just use existing resources and ended up with a bookmarklet like this:

javascript:var Manifest = 'small bookmarklet that saves a couple of keystrokes';
if (document.URL.match(/books.google/)) {
var MW = window.open("https://reftag.appspot.com/?book_url=" + document.URL);
    MW.focus();
    return;
} else {
    MW = window.open("https://tools.wmflabs.org/yadkard/yadkard.fcgi?user_input=" + document.URL + "&dateformat=%25Y-%25m-%25d");
    MW.focus();
    return;
}

No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 03:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@No More Mr Nice Guy: Nice script, I think it's best to be used separately, as a stand-alone bookmarklet in it's own right. — Ark25 (talk) 23:19, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation[edit]

I've thought about that too, but also mainly avoided it just because of the size of the task. So basically, if you do it, great; if not, it's not really a big deal. - Biruitorul ^Talk 00:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicholas, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Niklaus and Nicolina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Mera (Switzerland)#River is not part of the name[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Mera (Switzerland)#River is not part of the name. Thanks. ZH8000 (talk) 18:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

William Goad[edit]

Good job on the article. I think it is neutral and well referenced enough to withstand a deletion discussion now. I've expanded it a little and nominated it to be featured on Wikipedia's main page at Template:Did you know nominations/William Goad. You are welcome to propose an alternative blurb there. Regards, Jolly Ω Janner 07:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for greatly improving the article! I feel kind of embarrassed for not trying to re-create it sooner. The first time I created it, it was based on a Romanian newspaper article, an article visibly lacking neutrality. However, an article about the biggest pedophile in UK should have been improved, not deleted. I still feel haunted by the fact that he could ruin thousands of human lives for 35 god damn years, about the minuscule effort the adults did to encourage the children to report when such things happen to them or to report when someone even tries to lure them, the minuscule effort made by the adults to educate the children in order to know how to avoid to be lured. I think the adults failed the children miserably in this case - and in many other cases like this. We give education to the children.. really??? Anyways, thanks again! — Ark25 (talk) 11:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that some of the article was copied word for word from the Daily Mail. For future reference, please never do this on Wikipedia unless you are certain the source gives permission for its work to be reproduced. Regards, Jolly Ω Janner 07:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Those sentences are very short. It's quite unthinkable for me that such newspapers would bother to sue Wikipedia for copying one or two phrases from their articles. — Ark25 (talk) 07:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William Goad[edit]

On 16 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Goad, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the British child rapist William Goad fled to Thailand, only to get caught using his credit card upon return and be sentenced to life imprisonment? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Goad. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IRC[edit]

Please come to the Wikipedia IRC channel. --Sailor Haumea (talk) 00:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tempo (retailer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tempo (retailer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tempo (retailer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 17:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URLs[edit]

I refer to your edit here: [2] Please avoid using Bare URLs on wikipedia, for reasons outlined at Wikipedia:Bare URLs, and instead format references with an approved method such as Template:Cite web. Have a nice day. Freikorp (talk) 13:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Ark25. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

indef[edit]

I saw your comments on Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy. One solution to your problem is that indefinite blocks would expire after a year if requested by the user. One year is a long time. If they are tricky and try to evade blocks, then the initial block is not going to be a deterrent. However, if they are ethical, they will abide by the one year block and act nicely after a year. Lakeshook (talk) 20:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lakeshook: Thanks for sharing your idea. I think this is also a good idea. Meanwhile my idea got a bit more clear and I found another name for Restricted users: "Corrector". It looks like the community and the WMF simply don't care about the smaller Wikipedias and allow unlimited abuses. I can do one edit per month, for an entire year, just for correcting misspellings - so I can prove that I am capable to act in good faith. I can keep doing only minor edits indefinitely. The community somehow suggests that the only solution is to create another user and to pretend to be someone else - which is not only humiliating but it also doesn't work. If the Romanian admins detect that I am using another username, they will revert all my edits. The people like me, acting in good faith, have no chance whatsoever to do anything useful for smaller Wikipedias, and I find that distasteful and also ridiculous for an entity that claims to be "a free online encyclopedia that aims to allow anyone to edit articles.". The WMF should do at least an absolute minimum to prevent unlimited abuses, by enforcing either your idea or my idea or something similar, on all Wikipedias. — Ark25 (talk) 21:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Ark25/Blog[edit]

User:Ark25/Blog, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ark25/Blog and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ark25/Blog during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 22:01, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: List of highest funded crowdfunding projects[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as List of highest funded crowdfunding projects, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://iex.ec/ http://www.newsbtc.com/2017/06/06/virtual-hackathon-experimental-api-status-im/ https://www.cnet.com/news/ifttt-flexes-its-muscle-with-new-smartthings-channel/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:List of highest funded crowdfunding projects and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, List of highest funded crowdfunding projects, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:List of highest funded crowdfunding projects. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:List of highest funded crowdfunding projects with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:List of highest funded crowdfunding projects saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:38, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Urwa ibn al-Ward[edit]

A tag has been placed on Urwa ibn al-Ward requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ark25. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ark25. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ark25. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rivers of the Ialomița subbasin[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rivers of the Ialomița subbasin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicolina for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicolina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GRuban (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dumbrava River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dumbrava River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Beneș River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Beneș River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boca River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Boca River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:25, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Botoşana River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Botoşana River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:43, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Buciumeni River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Buciumeni River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cristești River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cristești River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:47, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Laz River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Laz River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:55, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Izvorul Stânei River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Izvorul Stânei River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Izvoru River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Izvoru River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ivăneasa River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ivăneasa River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:59, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ilișua River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ilișua River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:59, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Valea Fântânii River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Valea Fântânii River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:14, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Voinegel River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Voinegel River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cheița River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cheița River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:56, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ciunget River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ciunget River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:03, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Căpățâna River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Căpățâna River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:19, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cărbunari River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cărbunari River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cărbunari (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cărbunari (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Doftănița River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Doftănița River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:39, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Drăculea River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Drăculea River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Drăgăneasa River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Drăgăneasa River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:43, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dăneasa River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dăneasa River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:44, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Frumușeaua River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Frumușeaua River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fântânița River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Fântânița River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:51, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ghilcoș River (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ghilcoș River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bugcrowd for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bugcrowd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bugcrowd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mkdw ^talk 19:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just going to go ahead and ask. Have you been engaged in undisclosed paid editing? A number of articles which you have re-created do not seemingly meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, you have written about your support for it in the past, and some of the articles you have re-created have a history of UPE. Mkdw ^talk 20:56, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mkdw: No, I was never engaged into any form of paid editing. I was just reading a few days ago an article on Ars Technica about a bug posted on Bugcrowd so I thought maybe this web platform is important enough to deserve an article on Wikipedia. I just happened to create an article deleted before. And I can't remember re-creating any other deleted article than William Goad which doesn't have a history of UPE. — Ark25 (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I asked because both Bugcrowd and Ashes of Creation were previously deleted and created by editors engaging in sock puppetry, undisclosed paid editing, or WP:PROMO. Mkdw ^talk 01:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mkdw Sure, your question was justified. I hope my reply was not too rough. I did not remember of Ashes of Creation. At this moment I would be not surprised if there are one or two more deleted articles that I have re-created and that I forgot about. — Ark25 (talk) 03:00, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashes of Creation for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashes of Creation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashes of Creation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mkdw ^talk 20:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tandarica[edit]

The article Tandarica has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mkdw ^talk 15:13, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages[edit]

Hi Ark25, thank you for your recent edits to disambiguation pages. Could you please keep in mind that intentional links to disambiguation pages should always go through an article title that includes '(disambiguation)', even if that link is a redirect (per WP:INTDAB). That lets editors and readers know that the link is intentional and not a mistake that needs to be fixed. Thanks, Leschnei (talk) 16:54, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Leschnei: Sorry for the trouble I have created. I was not using (disambiguation) in the links when I linked pages that had related titles by just adding another letter to the title of the page I was editing. For example, at Laure, I linked Laurel – Lauren – Laurer – Lauret – Laurey – Laureano. Or by doubling letters - for example at Vale - Valle – Valee – Vallee. These are not variations of the word but they are simply obtained by combining the letters of the initial word (appending letters in this case). Since there are sometimes so many such combined words, I was trying to reduce the space used, by compressing them on a single line. The best example is at Vale too: Valea – Valee – Valeh – Valek – Valen – Valeo – Valer – Vales – Valev - they are obtained by appending one letter to the initial word. — Ark25 (talk) 18:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your reasoning on putting multiple entries on one line, and it makes some sense, but it goes against the MOS for disambiguation pages, so other editors will feel obliged to fix it. Leschnei (talk) 18:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Valerianus (disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Valerianus (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Valerianus (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Leschnei (talk) 18:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Leschnei: Most likely, it was my error to rename the page in the first place, sorry for that. — Ark25 (talk) 19:00, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Valerius (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valere (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Vincent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Vinci, Vin, Vince and Vinko

Bálint (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)