User talk:Arpanmehra

Welcome!

Hello, Arpanmehra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like New Jaipur, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Biker Biker (talk) 09:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of New Jaipur[edit]

A tag has been placed on New Jaipur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Biker Biker (talk) 09:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to New Jaipur, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Biker Biker (talk) 10:08, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of New Jaipur[edit]

A tag has been placed on New Jaipur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 19:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to New Jaipur has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is the second time you have created New Jaipur and the second time you have used (the same) material that was a blatant copyright infringement. Please stop or you will be banned from Wikipedia. Biker Biker (talk) 19:29, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Jaipur[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of New Jaipur, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://m.timesofindia.com/PDATOI/articleshow/4913014.cms. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with New Jaipur[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, New Jaipur, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://m.timesofindia.com/PDATOI/articleshow/4913014.cms and http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/Draft-Master-Plan-2025-Approved/articleshow/5125323.cms and http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/new-jaipur-airport-overcomes-150-km-rule/389684/. As a copyright violation, New Jaipur appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. New Jaipur has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:New Jaipur and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:New Jaipur with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:New Jaipur.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:43, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Your addition to Jaipur Airport has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Jaipur Bus Rapid Transit[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Jaipur Bus Rapid Transit, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{url}}}. As a copyright violation, Jaipur Bus Rapid Transit appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Jaipur Bus Rapid Transit has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jaipur Bus Rapid Transit and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Jaipur Bus Rapid Transit with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jaipur Bus Rapid Transit.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated copyright violations, introduction of factual inaccuracies.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 18:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Deustche Bank Global Processing Centre Jaipur.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Deustche Bank Global Processing Centre Jaipur.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 09:50, 16 June 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:50, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Airports and Seaports Map.PNG[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Airports and Seaports Map.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 07:54, 17 June 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Image Screening Bot (talk) 07:54, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Airports and Seaports Map.PNG[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Airports and Seaports Map.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Revolving Restaurant Jaipur.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Revolving Restaurant Jaipur.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Image Screening Bot (talk) 12:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SMS Stadium, Jaipur.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SMS Stadium, Jaipur.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jaipur-logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jaipur-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jaipur International Fashion Week[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jaipur International Fashion Week, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jifw.org/aboutjifw.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:45, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaipur International Fashion Week[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jaipur International Fashion Week requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Max Viwe | Wanna chat with me? 11:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to violate copyright policy by copying text into Wikipedia from other sources, despite having previously been warned that this is not allowed. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text

{{unblock|I was not aware of the copyright policies and i thought that copying the exact information from the authorised wensite is not a copyright infringement but only information sharing since people do not know about the website but wikipedia is known to everyone}}

below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Theleftorium ^(talk) 13:19, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Central Museum - Albert Hall Jaipur.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Central Museum - Albert Hall Jaipur.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theleftorium ^(talk) 13:29, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arpanmehra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had contributed to the wikipedia pages in an inappropriate manner because I wasn't aware of the policies back then. It has been more than 3 years since that happened. Please unblock my account.

Decline reason:

Simply procedurally declining this unblock request so the other one can stand on its own for now. - Vianello (Talk) 10:23, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay, can you explain in your own words what you did wrong and how are you going to avoid it if unblocked? Please provide enough details. Max Semenik (talk) 09:10, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arpanmehra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason why I got blocked was because I used unauthorized and copyrighted content to update a few pages. But if you notice, all those pages were general information pages and were about the new developments in my hometown. I was particularly excited about updating the pages on Wikipedia and wasn't aware of the policies. For example - I had created a page on New Jaipur and Jaipur Bus Rapid Transit. I used content from the official website of Jaipur Bus Rapid Transit and for new Jaipur, I used content from various news sites. All of this was just to update the page and not for any personal gains or with the objective to harm anyone. I will refrain from uploading any copyrighted material on wikipedia articles and will read up the conditions before contributing. Thanks. Arpan Mehra

Decline reason:

The agreement to refrain from adding copyrighted material is a start. However, based on this appeal I have serious doubts that you actually understand why copyright violations are such a big issue here, or even what would constitute a copyright violation. Until it's clear that you are aware of the issues raised by copy-pasting non-free material, and why Wikipedia can't allow it, I'm not comfortable lifting this block. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:55, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arpanmehra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay! How do I prove that I have understood how big a deal copy paste violation is. What I had done with my account was 3 years ago and I wasn't aware of the policies. I understand that Wikipedia will be held responsible if I upload copyrighted content and my account will be banned again which is not going to serve my purpose. This is the last attempt I can make in requesting you to unblock my account. I want to write a few articles about the field I work in and contribute to the definitions of the technology I use. This is completely different from why I was on Wikipedia the last time. How do I prove that I understand why copyright violations are such a big issue and what constitutes a copyright violation. Anything that is not original or is released without the permissions of the owner/creator of the piece is copyright violation.

Decline reason:

{{subst:No response for a week, declining. Bjelleklang - talk 13:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC) }} Bjelleklang - talk 13:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your previous actions violated key Wikipedia policies. Even if you understand why we can't have copyrighted material copy-pasted into articles, I'm still not sure you understand what Wikipedia is all about. You still have to provide reliable sources for anything you write, can you provide us with any examples of articles you'd start or contribute to, and what sources you would use? Bjelleklang - talk 20:31, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]