User talk:Arqoub imp

Welcome!

Hello, Arqoub imp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Barry m (talk) 04:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Israeli propaganda[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Israeli propaganda, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article title and content blatantly violate NPOV

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Andrew_pmk | Talk 07:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. --Ynhockey ^(Talk) 07:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Marwan Barghouti. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Boracay Bill (talk) 08:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:54, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Marwan Barghouti. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 22:44, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ariel Sharon. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 23:15, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Israeli propaganda[edit]

I have nominated Israeli propaganda, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israeli propaganda. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 01:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring report[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#Arqoub imp reported by Malik Shabazz (Result: ). — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 03:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Marwan Barghouti. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety ^talk 03:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arqoub imp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

see below

Decline reason:

You have not addressed the actual reason you have been temporarily blocked. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's three revert rule; what we call "edit warring" is not an acceptable way to create an encyclopedia, which is the only thing we're doing here. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 05:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i was blocked for mentioning information which is not okayed by the israeli supporters...

is this place for promoting the israeli side?

first: marwan albargothi is a member of fateh, and it has to be written there. he did not split from it.

second: in the article it is written that, he was charged for murdering israeli civilians and attacks on israeli army

well, this statement is not neutral at all. by writing so, it seems that whikipedia adopt the israeli claim. this is nor neutral journalism, neither objective. at least it can be written that

the israeli court charged him for israeli civilians and attacks on israeli army and then mentioning the palestinian point of view which is resisting the occupation. so the point is the murdering ...etc should be put between bractes and the other point of view should be brought if you really want to spread the truth and wanna be objective