User talk:Arslan Arie

Josip Broz Tito was a criminal dictator and there are a lot of sources by several books in many languages: I agree with you! Related article is not neutral and I suggest to start discussion in talk page of article about this brutal dictator Broz: you can start discussion and I will intervene later because I have short time for wikipedia. Regards, --Forza bruta (talk) 17:07, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Josip Broz Tito[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have never something like this. Tito was a known executioner and Wikipedia presents him as benevolent. What is there to even discuss? Several parts of the article are biased, and there is even a language there which is political (Serbo-Croatian) not linguistic. Please consider. In case it is of interest, I am assistant professor of political science, and I know this. Arslan Arie (talk) 20:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail[edit]

Hello, Arslan Arie. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Forza bruta (talk) 17:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

I request your opinion in Talk:Josip_Broz_Tito#Reliable_sources_and_unreliable_sources. Regards---Forza bruta (talk) 17:00, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Boris Havel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boris Havel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boris Havel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dans (talk) 16:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]