User talk:ArtistInWordyThings

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome to the Teahouse BadgeThis user got the Welcome to the Teahouse Badge.
Earn one at: Teahouse Badges


Welcome![edit]

A cup of warm tea to welcome you!

Hello, ArtistInWordyThings, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here! Vanjagenije (talk) 20:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, ArtistInWordyThings. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by StarryGrandma (talk) 20:31, 13 May 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Isao Noda (May 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dr. Noda seems like a very interesting scientist. This will make a good article with a bit of work. You have a list of references, but we can't tell which statement comes from which source. See User:Yunshui/References for beginners for how to do this. The material on Meridian sounds more like marketing material than an encyclopedia article and will need to be rewritten. Happy editing. StarryGrandma (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NodaxTM (May 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
You also need references that are independent of the invention of the product from reliable independent sources. References at the end of the article aren't enough. We need to know the sources of individual statements. Articles from the industry comparing this polymer to similar ones will do. Leave out TM. We don't use it in Wikipedia articles. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks. StarryGrandma (talk) 22:17, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile![edit]

Welcome to the Teahouse Badge Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing!
~ Anastasia (talk) 15:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Isao Noda was accepted[edit]

Isao Noda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 14:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NodaxTM, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ArtistInWordyThings. This is just to let you know that I made a minor edit to this page, so it will remain in the Articles for Creation space for another 6 months. If you want to keep working on it, I would suggest that you take the advice to request Userfication. Then you work on it at your leisure.
Also, I made some edits to your article on Dr. Noda. Thanks for creating that. If you have time maybe you could check it to make sure that I didn't mess anything up. Now that it is created, I think you can blank the draft in your sandbox at User:ArtistInWordyThings/sandbox, or add {{db-user}} to the top of the sandbox page. That would delete the current sandbox . Usually we delete our drafts once the article has been created. Thanks. – Margin1522 (talk) 09:16, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NodaxTM, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtistInWordyThings. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "NodaxTM".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Reach Out to the Truth 05:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NodaxTM (August 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
j⚛e deckertalk 15:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NodaxTM has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NodaxTM. Thanks! KylieTastic (talk) 14:04, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NodaxTM (August 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hell in a Bucket was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hell in a Bucket (talk) 03:10, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NodaxTM (September 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Callmemirela was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 22:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:NodaxTM, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NodaxTM[edit]

Hello, ArtistInWordyThings. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "NodaxTM".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Azealia911 talk 14:14, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Danimer Scientific corporate logo © October 2016.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Danimer Scientific corporate logo © October 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, ArtistInWordyThings. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Danimer Scientific, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Widefox; talk 12:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]