User talk:Ashiqur rahman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ragib 05:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ragib 05:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 05:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 05:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Instead of acting out of party lines, please follow neutral point of view. I hope when you come back, you will make productive edits. Thank you. --Ragib 05:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC) {{unblock}} i want to speak with u directly Rajib, what wrong with you to tell the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashiqur rahman (talkcontribs) [reply]

  • I have reviewed the block and found it apropriate. Please contribute positively after the block will expire. Happy edits abakharev 12:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In reply to your email where you wrote:
whatever i edit is truth and that was not my comment. those are the public opinion, if someone can put the public opinion about H M Ershad, then why i cant put public opinion about Tareq Rahman. hope you will mail me personally about this problem and take away BLOCK on me. dont hesited pls mail me.
Firstly, Malo (talk · contribs) blocked you before me (quite rightfully, your contribution consists solely of article and userpage vandalisms). You might consider mailing him about it. Secondly, an encyclopedia is NOT the place to express "opinions", you need to express facts, backed by citations/references to reputable sources. What you personally think is irrelevant, and unacceptable. In future, when inserting such broad allegations, please have proper references. Wikipedia's foundation is the concept of neutral point of view, and please stick to that.
Finally, please use my talk page or your talk page for future messages. I hope you'd make constructive edits in wikipedia in good faith. Thank you. --Ragib 19:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


In response to your email stating that:
why dont u unblock me........the word OPINION which i use on my mail, actually i tried to mean some thing else. any way ami ki apnar shathey sorasory kotha boltey pari?
Your block was a 24 hour one. The effective block was put forward by Malo (talk · contribs), so please direct unblock requests to him. As I said earlier, please use your talk page or mine to communicate with me transparently. Thank you. --Ragib 01:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]