User talk:Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki

January 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bhangi because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bhangi, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bhangi was changed by Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871127 on 2015-01-02T12:01:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bhangi. Take it to the Talk page - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:02, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruption of articles by making major changes without providing explanation or sources. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 16:32, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Valmiki Caste has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Valmiki Caste was changed by Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955091 on 2015-01-08T11:34:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I'm not using other accounts as an administrative told me not use multiple accounts.But he blocked me I didnt know why he blocked me when I was using just one account.I'm very angry and also disappointed Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki (talk) 03:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is better of without editors whose only purpose is to argue about castes. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you saying that you've never used another account, or that you stopped using the other account(s) when they asked? Origamite^ⓣⓒ 14:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]