User talk:Asiaten-Kenner

December 2013[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Germany. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Darkwind (talk) 17:07, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sabah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. — иz нίpнόp^ʜᴇʟᴘ! 17:48, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is also unconstructive. Please do not do that again. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Japan. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Oda Mari (talk) 09:28, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Politics of Iran, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Flat Out let's discuss it 03:29, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]