User talk:Asimova

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Asimova, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:58, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Winner 42. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Crime in Japan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 14:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Alex2006 (talk) 16:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24h for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

In addition to the above, also copyright violations, from here.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted ALL of your contributions (except for those which were reverted before me) since most of them are copyright violations and other are not written in an appropriate way. Next instance of introducing text protected by copyright will likely get your account blocked indefinitely. Thank you for your understanding.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:23, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asimova, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

The

Adventure

Hi Asimova!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Asimova! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:25, Sunday, May 24, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Asimova! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:26, Sunday, May 24, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Speedy deletion nomination of Roza Kuanyshevna Rymbayeva[edit]

A tag has been placed on Roza Kuanyshevna Rymbayeva requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

page already exists as Roza Rymbayeva, exact duplicate

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hair^Talk 16:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of History of Kultegin[edit]

Hello Asimova,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged History of Kultegin for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Rob van vee 18:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Halvanical elements[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Halvanical elements. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Galvanic cell. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Galvanic cell – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GILO A&E⇑ 22:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Effect of demand[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Effect of demand. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Demand. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Demand – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abai's way short version[edit]

The article Abai's way short version has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wholly non-encyclopedic article that reads like a book report. The author makes no attempt at neutrality.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Non-Dropframe _talk 23:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of History of Abai's way[edit]

The article History of Abai's way has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wholly non-encyclopedic article that reads like a book report. The author makes no attempt at neutrality

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 23:23, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Effect of demand[edit]

I deleted this because we already have an article on Demand. It might be that some ot the content you added could usefully be merged to Demand. If you would like a copy restored to your userspace so that you can work on it and try to use it to improve the Demand article (or any other article) using independent, reliable sources, please place a note requesting restoration on User talk:DESiegel, at the bottom of the page, and I will do so when I have a chance. Or you may instead ask any one of these administrators, who have indicated a willingness to fulfill such requests.DES ^(talk) 00:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It just can not continue like this[edit]

Hi Madina. It is great that you want to contribute to Wikipedia, but we can not accept just everything. In several days, you introduced texts which are copyright violations, created articles which duplicate existing articles, and created articles which are not appropriate according to our manual of style. May I please suggest that you slow down a bit, read the policies, ask our help if needed and then slowly start working. Actually, improving existing articles (and there is quite a lot to improve about Kazakhstan) may be easier than to create new articles, especially if you do it incrementally.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Resources and their classification. Economic and non-economic resources[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Resources and their classification. Economic and non-economic resources, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.grandars.ru/student/ekonomicheskaya-teoriya/ekonomicheskie-blaga.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Economic resource. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Economic resource, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Merit good[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Merit good requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://majalil.yolasite.com/resources/P.F%20goods.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm WikiDan61. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Opportunity cost, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your addition at this page did nothing but restate what was already stated in the rest of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know you want to help, but...[edit]

... you're not going about it the right way. Your contributions to the English Wikipedia (en.wiki) appear to consist entirely of creating articles that duplicate existing topics (Kazakh tradition vs Culture of Kazakhstan; Sanctions against russia vs International sanctions during the Ukrainian crisis; etc) or to add material to articles that duplicates material already in the article; or to copy text from the Russian Wikipedia (ru.wiki) that you have run through Google translate, which produces largely unusable English. Rather than simply copying other people's words and thoughts, Wikipedia wants you to create your own words (based on citations to reliable sources of course). I have reverted many of your changes. Please do not re-add machine translations, or simply dump large pieces of text into already developed articles. Article improvement is a more subtle process of correcting individual sentences or expanding an existing paragraph with material that perhaps completes an incomplete concept.

I like your enthusiasm, but I hope you can channel it properly. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~@WikiDan61:~~

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asimova (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't know about these problems. Please unblock me I will not continue editing or writing new articles, but I need to edit my user page and I promise I won't repeat my mistakes. It is the first time I write and edit articles, I want to help Wikipedia and because of this I did not notice my mistakes. Please sorry.

Decline reason:

I cannot accept your statement that you did not know about these problems. You have already had one short block and have received no less than fifteen warnings of various kinds directly relating to your editing. In order to be considered for unblock please explain why you ignored these warnings; also please give details of your understanding of the various serious editing errors you have made, and describe what you intend to do to avoid making the same errors in the future. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

~~@WikiDan61:~~

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asimova (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not noticed the messages what others sended me, but since this day I will try to accept mistakes and don't do them. Please, please and please help me to not do these mistakes and please unblock me for only 1 day I really need to edit my user page. And after this you can delete me. I lost my hopes to the Wikipedia, and I have found that it's difficult to work on Wikipedia,whereas I want to write or edit articles on this. So if you will not unblock me, please just say me when I will be unblocked? I hope you will help me))

Decline reason:

That is not a valid reason for unblock. I'm willing to blank your userpage for you, after which you are free to vanish if that's what you're really looking for. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.