User talk:Atbannett/Archive 1

I welcome you & wish you success. tell us about yourself (or write to me). git vuch, Shilonite 16:44, 5 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks! How do I write to you? and where am I supposed to "tell us about yourself". Thanks Atbannett 19:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

About your edit to Yuval Steinitz: My mistake. Thanks for correcting me!
In answer to the question above, you can write about yourself in your user page, which you get to by clicking on Atbannett at the top of your screen. --Zvika 09:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear Atbannett,

I second what Zvika wrote. You can visit my user page, browse it and use it as base for your own. I think that noting language skills is important (see Category:User languages). Location and affiliations help, but aren't imperative if you don’t want to reveal them - that's why I suggested that you write directly to me. Notice the vertical bar on the left? It has an option “E-mail this user”. Through that you can write to me personally (what we don’t want the public to see.

Be in touch, Shilonite 17:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Userpagious emptiosus

USEYOURNAME

Greetings and Welcome! I noticed that your username shows up red when you post an edit -- in case you were wondering why, this is because your userpage is devoid of content. If you were to place anything at all on your userpage (text, photographs, etc.), your username would then appear blue by default. By convention, most serious contributing editors place information about themselves on their userpages, and as a result, editors whose usernames are still red may appear to other editors as lacking a serious motivation in both editing Wikipedia articles as well as joining the Wikipedia community at large. I therefore recommend that you place something on your userpage, such as information relating to your city of residence and occupation -- basically anything that will allow another editor to identify with you and peer into your mind a bit. You can check out other editors' userpages to get an idea of what is normally included (find them easiest by checking the history tab on randomly chosen yet substantial articles), and even copy/paste from other editors' userpages (modifying the information to reflect your own, of course). DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 03:56, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ofer Grosbard

The article Ofer Grosbard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 12:53, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

I am the middle of adding my draft to it. Please remove your request until I am done and then see if you'd like to add it again. Thanks, Atbannett (talk) 12:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

April 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Eli Cohen (politician born 1972), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at oldest people, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I also suggest reviewing the sanctions discussed at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Longevity and note that there is zero tolerance for edit warring on these articles. Unless you have a reliable source that state explicitly that Núñez Olivera is now the world's oldest man, please do not re-add this information to the page. Canadian Paul 03:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

OK, thanks. So who is the World's Oldest Man today? Atbannett (talk) 09:58, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Unknown, until a reliable source (most likely Guinness, a widely-recognized authority on the subject) fills us all in with that information. Canadian Paul 14:04, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

OK. Thank you! Atbannett (talk) 14:29, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Atbannett. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Eli Cohen

Given your previous assistance of an editor with a clear conflict of interest at the Eli Cohen article, and your sudden appearance at this article today after a brand new account adding promotional material was reverted, I hope you don't mind me asking whether you have a conflict of interest with the subject or what your relationship with the Omrierental account is? Unfortunately your editing pattern on this article raises some questions.

I'm also surprised that an experience editor would revert clearly incorrectly formatted references back into the article without trying to fix then, unless it was just a blind revert? Number 57 17:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Since I follow this article I noticed the change. I did edit it slightly and as I wrote - I think it is notable. I'd be happy if you can edit it and make it better. And to answer your question - I have no conflict of interest or connection with Mr. Cohen. Atbannett (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

I'm rather dubious about your response given your previous involvement in the article and infrequent editing, and I noticed you didn't answer the question about Omrierental. And the insistence on reverting clearly incorrectly formatted references when they've already been pointed out to you (you're an experienced editor so you know full well how to sort it out) is really quite appalling conduct. Regardless of this, I still don't think the information is worth including, so please discuss on talk per WP:BRD if you still want it included. Number 57 21:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Sorry. I missed your question about this editor. I don't know him/her. Atbannett (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sivan Rahav-Meir

Hello, Atbannett. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sivan Rahav-Meir, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Sivan Rahav-Meir to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:36, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Crystallizedcarbon foe the comment. I will add sources in the next day or two. Atbannett (talk) 20:35, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Great, thank you. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 05:43, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Atbannett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Atbannett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alan Hoffmann

The article Alan Hoffmann has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. I added sources. Atbannett (talk) 17:12, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alan Hoffmann

The article Alan Hoffmann has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ifnord (talk) 18:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Alan Hoffmann moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alan Hoffmann, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Hoffmann (July 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:BASIC.

K.e.coffman (talk) 18:31, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Alan Hoffmann concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alan Hoffmann, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Alan Hoffmann

Hello, Atbannett. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alan Hoffmann".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 15:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Deaths in 2020

Hi. When submitting to this article (as you did for Susan Rothenberg), make sure to include a source, and nationalities aren't wikilinked. Thanks. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 18:39, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Yaari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! It was the wrong link. I removed it. Atbannett (talk) 07:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Zionist Movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mizrachi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Article moves

Hello. When you move an article, please fix any incoming links on templates (in the cases of your recent moves, {{Current MKs}}). Also, if you change the spelling of an article title, it is good practice to fix any incoming links on other articles to ensure consistency. Cheers, Number 57 21:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Atbannett (talk) 21:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Omer Yankelevich

Hi, thank you for working on this article. Please be aware that all information must be verified by citing to reliable sources. Information on the Hebrew Wikipedia is usually not sourced, and those pages cannot be used as a source. If you added something to this article that is unsourced, it will probably be removed. Yoninah (talk) 21:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Please also stay away from non-neutral language and self-promotion, as in your last edit. Yoninah (talk) 21:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of German Zakharyayev

The article German Zakharyayev has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I Added more sources. If you have a specific question - please let me know. I think the best source was already there. The first in the External Links, by Chief Rabbi Lau. Atbannett (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Naftali Bennett

You said you were in touch with the PM's spokesman regarding the release of his official image and would update. Any progress? If we don't hear back soon the conversation will have to move forward.--RM (Be my friend) 22:28, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I just sent him a reminder and will update as soon as I hear from him. Atbannett (talk) 05:16, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

German Zakharyayev moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, German Zakharyayev, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 12:44, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ofer Grosbard

The article Ofer Grosbard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP presented with no references. Single reference supplied was a drive-by malware page and was removed. Fails WP:SIGCOV. NPROF not applicable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 10:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ohr HaTorah Day School

The article Ohr HaTorah Day School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Never been referenced. Mentioned in directories and map sites but no coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 10:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Ofer Grosbard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ofer Grosbard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ofer Grosbard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 18:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

ARBPIA

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

nableezy - 02:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Chaim Navon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chaim Navon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 15:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you User:Padgriffin. I have now submitted it. Atbannett (talk) 07:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaim Navon (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caorongjin was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chaim Navon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Caorongjin 💬 12:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Atbannett! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Caorongjin 💬 12:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chaim Navon (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chaim Navon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 13:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Els Bendheim

I have removed the reference to Michael Eisenberg at the family's request. Drkup(IMJ) (talk) 18:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Atbannett (talk) 20:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Hebrew abbreviations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riverdale.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Done, thank you! Atbannett (talk) 08:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Arutz Sheva into Hagai Segal. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your comment. Sorry for my omission. Will know for next time. Atbannett (talk) 15:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Unblock me please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atbannett (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi! I was surprised to see this morning that I was blocked from Wikipedia, without the curtesy of speaking with me beforehand. I have been editing in Wikipedia for over 16 years and have contributed tens of thousands of edits, mostly in Hebrew Wikipedia. After trying to understand why this surprise block happenned - I saw that a few weeks ago, a Wikipedian claimed to have evidence that my vote against a block of another Wikipedian was somehow illegal. I have no idea what this evidence might be, but I can confirm that I am not a sockpuppet on any other user as and you can see from my previous edits - I do participate in discussions and talk pages, from time to time, in both English and Hebrew. I would also hope that in the future - if someone has questions about something I did - they would at least ask me, before using this tool. Thank you very much, Atbannett (talk) 12:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm not a checkuser, so I can't review the evidence, but I can tell you that we just don't unblock people blocked as sockpuppets just because they say they're not. I mean, if we did, why should we even bother having a sockpuppetry policy then? — Daniel Case (talk) 10:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Summarizing: I woke up one morning to see that I am blocked, with a reference to some "evidence", which I cannot see and without asking me to defend myself. Then after I appealed, the appeal was denied by an admin, who didn't think that seeing the evidence is needed. Guilty unless proven innocent? I cannot fight this untrue charge, without knowing what I am supposed to be denying. I will focus on my edits in Hebrew Wikipedia and will be back here, in a few weeks. Atbannett (talk) 11:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC)