User talk:Atharkhan

Notability of McAndrews Held and Malloy

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on McAndrews Held and Malloy, by Marwood (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because McAndrews Held and Malloy seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting McAndrews Held and Malloy, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

I have removed the speedy deletion tag on McAndrews, Held & Malloy which is probably a bit too extreme. However, please note that you should establish that this law firm has been the subject of non-trivial third-party coverage and such references should be cited in the article. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 20:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Orange banner

Yes, a bug in the software currently creates all sort of weird behavior of the orange bar for IPs. It is being worked on. What I can do though is to delete the talk page. Pretty radical solution but since the message was intended for you, no harm done. Pascal.Tesson 18:50, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Wow! That's fantastic! Thank you!

Athar Khan 18:56, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Notable attorneys at McAndrews, Held & Malloy

Hi, see my response there. cheers. --Edcolins 18:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Chicago Intellectual Property Alliance

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chicago Intellectual Property Alliance, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.chicagoipalliance.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Chicago Intellectual Property Alliance

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Chicago Intellectual Property Alliance, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.chicagoipalliance.com. As a copyright violation, Chicago Intellectual Property Alliance appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Chicago Intellectual Property Alliance has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Chicago Intellectual Property Alliance and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Chicago Intellectual Property Alliance with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Chicago Intellectual Property Alliance.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Jd027 (talk) 20:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Notability of Chicago Intellectual Property Alliance

A tag has been placed on Chicago Intellectual Property Alliance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 20:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Corporation notability Chicago Intellectual Property Alliance

I'd start by reading over Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) - and then Wikipedia:Reliable sources - which the article is 100% missing (and has been tagged as such). Note that citing the company's website is not 3rd party coverage, which is what is essential. The copyright issues are handled beginning at Wikipedia:Copyrights#Using copyrighted work from others, and maybe Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Skier Dude (talk) 20:19, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of McAndrews, Held & Malloy

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on McAndrews, Held & Malloy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   23:52, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Hicks Canyon Elementary School

Hi. I have redirected Hicks Canyon Elementary School to Tustin_Unified_School_District#Elementary_schools. It is general WIkipedia practice, as documented in WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES that elementary schools aren't notable and should instead be a redirect to the district's webpage. If you have questions or want to talk further please feel free to ping me here or leave a message on my talk page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:12, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tariq Shafi

Hello Atharkhan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tariq Shafi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 23:55, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Tariq Shafi, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 01:27, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 18:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Tariq Shafi

Per your email request to restore the page or at least give the references, i'm going to decline. All of the references basically talk about the death of the subject. You need to find other sources to cover things beyond the death. We are not a memorial. You also have a COI as declared in the email to me. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I have restored the article to your userspace but I am also adding a protection to the article so that it can't be moved back to mainspace without a proper review as you are still wanting to see the content and could create another account and attempt to repost it like I've seen many do before. Furthermore, please don't use email to communicate with me as it's not a private issue. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 09:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Amanda -- I am not sure if this is the right way to communicate. Just wanted to say thank you! I hope you get my message. -Athar.

Speedy deletion nomination of Chakwal Group

Hello Atharkhan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Chakwal Group for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales ^Parley 21:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Certified Family Law Specialist moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Certified Family Law Specialist. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 03:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Certified Family Law Specialist

Hello, Atharkhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Certified Family Law Specialist, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Certified Family Law Specialist

Hello, Atharkhan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Certified Family Law Specialist".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)