User talk:Atlasrune

Your Burning sand article is pretty short, and without much information or context. There's also not a whole lot you can say about it. I'd probably suggest that you turn it into a redirect to the Falling Sand Game article, and add in a section on "Burning Sand" to there. That way, users get all the information in one place, and it lets them find out about the modification if they simply look up the original game. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 22:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

It's me, Mr. E from the Burning Sand site. Nice to meet you. Random the Scrambled 12:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look[edit]

Some other users joined in to help you fix Burning Sand. It's in pretty good shape now. Random th e Scrambled ^(?)(Vandalism and other nonsense!) 19:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BurningSand.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BurningSand.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources[edit]

Thanks for your enthusaism on the Asheville, North Carolina article! However, just because you find information on the 'net doesn't make it a reliable source. For instance, a local real estate office doesn't qualify as a reliable, verifiable source. A better source would be a "trusted" newspaper. Cheers. tedder (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have never touched a page in North Carolina. I do not know where this message came from, or why you must place it on my page. Atlasrune (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are right- it should have gone to someone else. Feel free to delete this thread if you wish. tedder (talk) 16:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]