User talk:Auslli

Welcome!

Hello, Auslli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Hiberniantears (talk) 18:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--Auslli (talk) 18:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Mantecadas[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mantecadas, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mantecadas is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mantecadas, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alfonso VI of Castile[edit]

Cut and paste moves are not accepted at Wikipedia. If you would like to have this article moved, please propose it, following the instructions at Requested moves. Perhaps all rulers "of Castile" and "of León" should be renamed "of Castile and León"? Srnec (talk) 04:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Adrianu Martín[edit]

A tag has been placed on Adrianu Martín requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:06, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Aigen[edit]

A tag has been placed on Aigen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 19:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dokumentationszentrum Obersalzberg[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dokumentationszentrum Obersalzberg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 19:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Auslli. You have new messages at Dokumentationszentrum Obersalzberg's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 19:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of León[edit]

I've undid all your contributions in the Kingdom of León subject. Read this first: Wikipedia:Categorization and stop mixing the leonese politics and history in the English Wikipedia. Thank you and regards, Rastrojo (talk) 13:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You must respect the work other people are developing and questioning first why is that. All that was categorisez has its own reason and what you did is close to vandalism. --Auslli (talk) 16:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Second warning. Please, stop categorizing without sense. Regards. Rastrojo (talk) 17:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, if you have any trouble with the caterories I've made, there is a discussion page where you can explain that kind of things. Categories that you believe can't be developed other people can, and someone maybe have not your point of view, that I guess is not quiet neutral as Wikipedia would promote. So I invite you to be a bit more broad minded and not to destroy the work others develope for months. And please, don't be so agressive and impolitely, wikipedia is a free place, and you are not a cop.--Auslli (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Palatal lateral approximant[edit]

Your recent addition of Leonese to Palatal lateral approximant came with an incomplete source. If you don't fix it so that we know what source you're talking about and what part it's in, the citation is as good as worthless. — Æµ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]} 22:31, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, this is not complete. What is Cuentos del Sil? — Æµ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]} 02:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Geozone[edit]

I have nominated Geozone, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geozone. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sang'gre Habagat (talk) 13:22, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heinz Schaden[edit]

A tag has been placed on Heinz Schaden, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ManishEarth^{Talk • Stalk} 08:38, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asturian parishes[edit]

Hello. Why are you placing CSD tags on Asturian parish articles when they are Spanish populated places, comparable to an American "county"? As you can see, there is additional info about most of them on the Asturian and Spanish language wikipedias that I didn't translate, but someone else could. There are historic buildings in some of them, and some of them have notable people that I haven't linked. In other words, they are stubs and they need work. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rosiestep. The minimun unity in Spain is the municipality, (then there are villages and then parishes!!!) and many of this parishes has less that 50 people living and with 100 meters distance one for another... There are municipalities with more than 100 parishes, so I believe that is not a dictionary (and almost all the pages I have proposed for deletion are) and nor a parish guide. They have absolutely no relevance, and if they have, it has been not shown properly in the parishes I proposed for deletion.--Auslli (talk) 21:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That as maybe but they still aren't eligable for speedy deletion as they do contain content. They would need to be deleted using WP:PROD or WP:AfD so I've removed the speedy delete requests. Dpmuk (talk) 21:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I looked at the Asturian and Spanish-language wikipedias, I saw that an Asturian "parish" is a sub-unit of a "municipality", and that "villages/towns/hamlets" are sub-units of parishes. I reviewed WP:POPP to see if a "parish" would be considered an appropriate article. Per WP:POPP#Criteria for judging small population centres' first example (A residential hamlet in the parish of X is the birth place of a published author. The existence and location of the hamlet should be noted in X's article, and the fact of the author's birthplace on the author's article. There is nothing else to be usefully said so no separate article is necessary. Redirect the name of the hamlet to the parish aricle.), a parish is notable (at least that's how I read it), while a hamlet (town/village, etc.) may or may not meet notability criteria. It's true I did not include hamlets/villages/towns in each parish article; I could go back and add that info, as could anyone else. I admit to not being an expert on Asturian parishes, so please let me know if I should be reviewing something else besides WP:POPP in order to establish notability of a populated place. Thanks. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:10, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rosiestep. I think we can have an agreement. Yes, certainly we can be talking about "subunities" and finishing in the part of the table of the kitchen where a man of the parish is seated, but that doesn't convern wikipedia. If Ronald Reagan was there, does. And like I tell you, in Spain the minimun unity is the municipality, or going farther, the villages who have their own ellectionships for major. What do you think about consider appropiates articles those who really have something that permit them to be considereted as "interesant" for wikipedia, like some monument, birthplace of a cellebrity or somethnig like that, and not all the other ones? Beacuase like I tell you, we have to make a stop elsewhere and don't include places without enciclopedic interest. Best regards.--Auslli (talk) 09:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Auslli. I respect your opinion and your interest in the Asturian parish articles, and I agree that writing "interesting" place articles is good for Wikipedia! However, I disagree with your suggestion as to which Asturian parish articles I should or shouldn't create as: (a) per the Asturias government website, parishes are a part of the territory organization; (b) per WP:Notability (geography), populated, legally-recognized places are notable; (c) the Asturian parish articles I'm creating are transwikied from other language wikipedias, so their notability has been established elsewhere; and (d) only creating articles about "interesting" places... well, that's subjective (right?).
I hope you reconsider your position on this issue, and that you remove the Prod Tag from Ronda (Illano). But if you continue to disagree with me as to whether or not articles such as Ronda meet wikipedia's notability standard, we could seek the opinion of the wiki community, perhaps at WikiProject Spain and/or WikiProject Geography? In the meantime, I hope you enjoy the cup of tea. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:49, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So, I think we could arrive to an agreement. The last unity is the parish, according to wikipedia and the legallity in that regions. I'll remove the tag, in that sense. Are you ok?--Auslli (talk) 23:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All ok with me. We've reached agreement on this notability issue, and *gracias* for removing the Prod Tag. Also, in case you want to add it to your Watchlist, I left a comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spain#Asturian language name asking for feedback about including/excluding the Asturian language name translation within an Asturian geo article. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Auslli. You have new messages at Talk:Besullo (Allande).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Rosiestep (talk) 23:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mikroglottika[edit]

I have nominated Mikroglottika, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikroglottika. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chzz ► 08:59, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Bannerpuntulli.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bannerpuntulli.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did it. Everything OK.--Auslli (talk) 22:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Llinguamaterna.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Llinguamaterna.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed its cancellation because it's not necessary as fair use.--Auslli (talk) 16:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Lebanese Arabic[edit]

Thank you! -Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 17:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I checked the edits you have made. I don't see any addition of references. Can you clarify? Also, thanks for cleaning up the article. --Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 00:33, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Language[edit]

Thanks! The Jade Knight (talk) 01:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mountains in Austria[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However before adding any additional pages, you might consider fixing the spelling in any further pages you want to add from "in the south of tha Alstaadt" to "in the south of the Altstadt or Old City". Thanks. Passportguy (talk) 16:36, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rating the importance of articles[edit]

Hi Auslli, I noticed you rated the article Shabo language as "Top importance", but did not offer a reason. I had rated the article for the Ethiopian WikiProject as "Low" solely based on the number of speakers; the subject may be worthy of a higher rating in importance. If you have a reason for a higher rating, I'd like to read it -- preferably on Talk:Shabo language -- so I can consider raising my rating. -- llywrch (talk) 17:34, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After some more searching, I found the discussion on the project talk pages. What would be best is if you either (1) made a link from your edit comments to this discussion, or (2) replace the table the project template currently points to with the table on the Talk page. That way when curious people (like me) try to figure out the reasoning, we can find the explanation with a minimum of fuss. -- llywrch (talk) 22:58, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Links in Delaware languages[edit]

You added some links to the Delaware languages article, but most of them were for items already linked, either in the same section or in the preceding section. The general convention is as follows, from

Wikipedia:Linking#General principles:

Link only the first occurrence of an item. A link that had last appeared much earlier in the article may be repeated, but generally not in the same section. (Table entries are an exception to this; each row of a table should be able to stand on its own.

Jomeara421 (talk) 00:32, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re your response, I suggest you read the guidelines for linking, they're really pretty clear. Jomeara421 (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:I Festival Internacional de Televisión y Cine Hi´tóricu Reinu de Llión.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:I Festival Internacional de Televisión y Cine Hi´tóricu Reinu de Llión.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

European elections[edit]

Hello, Auslli, perhaps you'd like something non-critical on your talk page for once!

I took your useful European election returns for the Land of Salzburg and added names for the benefit of my fellow non-Austrians (I know what the SPOe is, but not the JuLis, for example). I also right-aligned the table, added party colours, and adjusted the language in the introductory sentence.

However, none of this is to criticise your own work, without which I would have had nothing to work with (and being born in London, I was following the UK Euro-elections more closely anyway). This is just to say that—if you're adding European election results for other Austrian states and cities which I'm not following—then you and your readers might find some of the things I've added to be helpful, and some of the code I worked out this afternoon might save you a little time. (I wish I knew a more elegant way to add the party colours since I'm certainly no expert.)

Best wishes —— Shakescene (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Lsf logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lsf logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:10, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:III Festival Celta Internacional Reinu de Llión.pdf[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:III Festival Celta Internacional Reinu de Llión.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leonese language[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:21, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Neutral Point of View is inalienable. Rastrojo (talk) 15:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cuentosdelsil.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cuentosdelsil.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Todmorden War Memorial[edit]

Many thanks for rewrite of article. I am sure that it will now be approved by "Ottre". I have just changed "Central Founting" to "Central Fountain" and remove comment regarding the need for a rewrite as that now seems redundant.

92.2.218.29 (talk) 15:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)weglinde[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eldrewitsch[edit]

Please respond above within 24 hours, or your account may be indefinitely blocked from editing. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I[edit]

Hello, Auslli. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is What, if anything, should be done?. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 19:42, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jazz feichu en Llión.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jazz feichu en Llión.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cartel festival celta.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cartel festival celta.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:18, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:I Festival Internacional de Televisión y Cine Históricu Reinu de Llión.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:I Festival Internacional de Televisión y Cine Históricu Reinu de Llión.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leon[edit]

Please voice your opinion on Talk:Sancha of León (born 1191/2)#Request Move and Talk:Dulce of León#Request Move.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 07:23, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:III Día de la Llingua Llïonesa.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:III Día de la Llingua Llïonesa.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lsf logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lsf logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Language-population update project[edit]

Hi. The 18th edition of Ethnologue just came out, and if we divide up our language articles among us, it won't take long to update them. I would appreciate it if you could help out, even if it's just a few articles (5,000 articles is a lot for just me), but I won't be insulted if you delete this request.

A largely complete list of articles to be updated is at Category:Language articles citing Ethnologue 17. The priority articles are in Category:Language articles with old Ethnologue 17 speaker data. These are the 10% that have population figures at least 25 years old.

Probably 90% of the time, Ethnologue has not changed their figures between the 17th and 18th editions, so all we need to do is change "e17" to "e18" in the reference (ref) field of the language info box. That will change the citation for the artcle to the current edition. Please put the data in the proper fields, or the info box will flag it as needing editorial review. The other relevant fields are "speakers" (the number of native speakers in all countries), "date" (the date of the reference or census that Ethnologue uses, not the date of Ethnologue!), and sometimes "speakers2". Our convention has been to enter e.g. "1990 census" when a census is used, as other data can be much older than the publication date. Sometimes a citation elsewhere in the article depends on the e17 entry, in which case you will need to change "name=e17" to "name=e18" in the reference tag (assuming the 18th edition still supports the cited claim).

Remember, we want the *total* number of native speakers, which is often not the first figure given by Ethnologue. Sometimes the data is too incompatible to add together (e.g. a figure from the 1950s for one country, and a figure from 2006 for another), in which case it should be presented that way. That's one use for the "speakers2" field. If you're not sure, just ask, or skip that article.

Data should not be displayed with more than two, or at most three, significant figures. Sometimes it should be rounded off to just one significant figure, e.g. when some of the component data used by Ethnologue has been approximated with one figure (200,000, 3 million, etc.) and the other data has greater precision. For example, a figure of 200,000 for one country and 4,230 for another is really just 200,000 in total, as the 4,230 is within the margin of rounding off in the 200,000. If you want to retain the spurious precision of the number in Ethnologue, you might want to use the {{sigfig}} template. (First parameter in this template is for the data, second is for the number of figures to round it off to.)

Dates will often need to be a range of all the country data in the Ethnologue article. When entering the date range, I often ignore dates from countries that have only a few percent of the population, as often 10% or so of the population isn't even separately listed by Ethnologue and so is undated anyway.

If Ethnologue does not provide a date for the bulk of the population, just enter "no date" in the date field. But if the population figure is undated, and hasn't changed between the 17th & 18th editions of Ethnologue, please leave the ref field set to "e17", and maybe add a comment to keep it so that other editors don't change it. In cases like this, the edition of Ethnologue that the data first appeared in may be our only indication of how old it is. We still cite the 14th edition in a couple dozen articles, so our readers can see that the data is getting old.

The articles in the categories linked above are over 90% of the job. There are probably also articles that do not currently cite Ethnologue, but which we might want to update with the 18th edition. I'll need to generate another category to capture those, probably after most of the Ethnologue 17 citations are taken care of.

Jump in at the WP:LANG talk page if you have any comments or concerns. Thanks for any help you can give!

— kwami (talk) 02:46, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leonese Language Day for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leonese Language Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonese Language Day until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Star Mississippi 18:31, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of El Toralín (association)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on El Toralín (association) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Star Mississippi 16:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of PuntuLLI[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on PuntuLLI requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Star Mississippi 18:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PuntuLLI[edit]

The article PuntuLLI has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability unclear; no independent sourcing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

I have converted this to a proposed deletion to give you a chance to fix the article if you are still receiving e-mail alerts. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cartel IV Día de la Llingua Llïonesa.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cartel IV Día de la Llingua Llïonesa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bannerpuntulli.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bannerpuntulli.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]