User talk:AussieRulesFan123

This user lives in the Australian state of New South Wales.

This user plays Minecraft.

AussieRulesFan123 is currently experiencing mental health issues, which may affect their Wikipedia editing in various ways. They may have difficulty with:

altered perception when making editorial judgements, determining consensus, or reading Wikipedia discussions addressed to them;
reduced availability on Wikipedia during times when they experience issues;
limited capacity to respond to other Wikipedians via talk page or email messages in a timely fashion, to participate in conflict resolution, or to complete their usual workload of Wikipedia tasks.

Thank you for your understanding.

Welcome![edit]

Hi AussieRulesFan123! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 47.227.95.73 (talk) 12:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

I am not a sock.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AussieRulesFan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not a sock AussieRulesFan123 (talk) 02:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You'd have to explain Special:Diff/1096648403 and Special:Diff/1101095667. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@NinjaRobotPirate: I noticed the user's contributions and I thought they should have stayed because they were accompanied by a source. Plus, reverting and deleting things because of "sockpuppetry" is stupid. It's basically censorship. I mean, Adolf Hitler, as you know, was a horrible person but you can still buy Mein Kampf! Are you saying sockpuppetry is worse than Nazism? Also, block me if you want (I don't really care about this website due to its loss of neutrality and this type of bullcrap made by the bullies known as "admins" (A.K.A rogue admins)) but undelete the redirects I requested; if they are useful and sensical redirects then let them be. Jesus. AussieRulesFan123 (talk) 06:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've read the "sockpuppet investigation" BS, first of all I am not a sockpuppet, don't care about your technical evidence and remove the stupid "tag" from my page (don't vandalise my user page, thanks) and I think the user has taken enough crap from you admins, checkusers and stewards. Like seriously, he edited months ago, just get over it! I don't understand why he's globally blocked, it seems that he made good edits on other wikis and even on this wiki (but apparently he made a few vandal edits too, I don't endorse that at all). Just leave him alone, you left controversial users (e.g Lsj and Wik) and even high-profile vandals (e.g Willy on Wheels) alone, why not him? Does he deserved to be treated like a criminal now? This is dumb. AussieRulesFan123 (talk) 06:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Haha very funny don't wanna answer me here but you're happy to file an unnecessary global block against me? Pussy. AussieRulesFan123 (talk) 07:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Help[edit]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

See above. I am being treated wrongfully and being called a sockpuppet even though I'm not. Also, see the notice above. I have ADHD and am currently experiencing stress with Wikipedia. AussieRulesFan123 (talk) 07:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to make another unblock request. If you make additional personal attacks, your access to this page will be removed. I am sorry for any conditions that you have that may affect your editing, but personal attacks are still unacceptable. If your condition prevents you from abiding by Wikipedia guidelines, especially those regarding civility, you will have to remain blocked to protect the project. 331dot (talk) 07:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock #2[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AussieRulesFan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Per above. I am not a sockpuppet. Please also remove the global block request for my account. Thanks! AussieRulesFan123 (talk) 10:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Highly likely based on technical evidence. Yamla (talk) 11:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pinging @331dot: for comment. AussieRulesFan123 (talk) 10:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, when did I ask for your input? I have heard from others that you are known for abusing others. I don't care about your technical evidence, it's wrong and you're wrong, just admit it.

I have no comment. You are very close to losing access to this page. If you cannot do better than "I'm not a sock", you have zero chance of being unblocked. Every sock claims they are not a sock, since that is the whole point. 331dot (talk) 11:52, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock #3[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AussieRulesFan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Per above, again. I AM NOT A SOCKPUPPET! Please also remove the global lock request for my account, filed by NinjaRobotPirate, and restore all my contributions and requested redirects. Thanks! AussieRulesFan123 (talk) 11:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]