User talk:Austin512

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Austin512, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! doncram (talk) 20:42, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Page[edit]

You deleted my page saying it was copyrighted i have permission from the author can you please re post it. I know i probably should not have written this here but i didnt know where to write it —Preceding unsigned comment added by LFC Sam LFC (talkcontribs) 15:52, 16 June 2009 (UTC) LFC Sam LFC (talk) 15:56, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Tedisco[edit]

Nice work over at Jim Tedisco; you've done a fine job with the citations and content. I just raised a point about the image used here. I'd like your input. Also, if you're interested, there's a Wikiproject for capital-region related issues. Feel free to join if you'd like. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 18:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA notification[edit]

Just so you know, New York's 20th congressional district special election, 2009, an article that you made a number of edits to, was recently rated as a good article. Thanks for helping out on the production of this article. wadester16 | Talk→ 20:10, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Just wondering - re this change why did you feel that small references were appropriate? Thanks.    7   talk Δ |   06:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Mark this page as patrolled"[edit]

Thanks for that. I wasn't aware of this feature. --Dmol (talk) 07:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

English vs. American spellings[edit]

Thanks for your response on Talk: Orange (colour). Specifically, this matter is governed by our rules about varieties of the English language. Except for articles which have an obvious regional basis, an article is left in whichever variety of English it began. Thus, articles about Aneurin Bevan or Ken Livingston would be in U.K. English, just as articles about Frank Zeidler or Frank Zappa would be in U.S. English. It happens that orange (colour) was begun in U.K. English, and thus it shall remain (repeated indignant efforts to change it to the "proper" spelling by xenophobic Yanks are among the legendary lamest edit wars of Wikipedia). --Orange Mike | Talk 16:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2009 New York State Senate Leadership Crisis[edit]

Updated DYK query On June 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2009 New York State Senate Leadership Crisis, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 14:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that this falls under WP:CSD#A7; see Talk:ADAPT the Proppakunnect. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:36, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You wanna be neutral[edit]

That bastard killed innocent people for no feasible reason and you want to be neutral towards him? If you support him, you are dead to me. Undoing my change was American and you know it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.140.46.137 (talk) 03:20, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for saving my contribution! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hovhannesk (talkcontribs) 23:19, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Working Man's Barnstar
Thanks a lot for helping to clear out the assessment backlog at WP:NY. I've been working on it by myself for some time, and it's quite refreshing to see others working on the task as well. In recognition of your help, I award you this barnstar. Thanks again! – TMF 22:24, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -- Austin512 (talkcontribs) 22:54, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Murphy (politician) → Scott Murphy[edit]

Good suggestion; I had planned on doing it soon enough myself. Thanks for the effort. wadester16 21:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessments[edit]

Thank you for the great job on assessing Capital District articles. Bearian (talk) 18:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rumah[edit]

Speedy? It is a dictionary thingo and I dont think any of the Indonesian project eds that I know of at the mo would want to even consider making it into anything - SatuSuro 03:29, 15 July 2009 (UTC) OK sorry about that - ok I confused you - and yes if thats the procedure - I'll go with that - we have many drive by edits in the Indonesian project - sigh SatuSuro 05:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Town of Greece, NY[edit]

The sister cities section is not "fake," it just needs citations.. The sister city association with Vitré France was dissolved in 2008. http://www.cityofrochester.gov/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=8589938075 I am working to find a reference for Rhodes.

BlueH2O (talk) 17:37, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Catskills photo at Greene Mountain Inn site[edit]

Actually, they don't seem to be when I check it out. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, what I meant is that I don't see the photo. The only background I get is green. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have a large widescreen monitor (which I generally don't use all of when I'm online) and I still don't see it. Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, for some reason it didn't show in the older version of Firefox I use. It does show (and how!) in IE 8. Thanks. I'll be in touch with them (They're not the only ones using it, but the other one (see the link from the commons page) asked). Daniel Case (talk) 14:27, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2008-2009 listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2008-2009. Since you had some involvement with the 2008-2009 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Art LaPella (talk) 02:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appointment of a Lt. Gov. in NY[edit]

Hello Austin. Just to comment on our debate on the talk page of the 2009 New York State Senate leadership crisis: I said that the appointment could not stand up in any court of law for five minutes, and I was absolutely right about it. The Appellate Division, sitting as a court of law, ruled unanimously against it. However, the Court of Appeals reversed, showing that a small majority chose to sit as a court of equity, which is something quite traditional both in anglo-saxon common law and New York state law. The New York Court of Chancery (from 1777 to 1822 superior to the New York Supreme Court) was expressly a court of equity, as was the Court for the Correction of Errors (from 1777 to 1822 superior to the Chancellor, and from 1823 to 1847 superior to the Supreme Court). I intend to write an article on this case (Skelos v. Paterson) soon. I'm not a lawyer, but I've read both the majority and the minority opinions and have to recognize that one is as legally sound as the other. The decision depends entirely on the approach to law itself. Kraxler (talk) 21:05, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pics[edit]

Seeing that you worked some OTRS magic to get this and other photos by this photographer, do you think the photographer would be interested in releasing some others? There are much better ones by him of Malcolm Smith, Pedro Espada, Rick Lazio, David Paterson, Michael Bloomberg, and Tom Golisano (to replace a fair use photo, which is not allowed in BLPs), (and these ones of Sheldon Silver and Thomas DiNapoli are better than nothing...), in addition to a great photo of the New York State Senate Chamber. Additionally, this would be great for New York in its government section. I'm surprised, based on his photos (NHRPs, buildings, historic sites, etc) that he doesn't edit Wikipedia and upload his images. Maybe you can press him? :-) upstateNYer 22:10, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Ballia[edit]

This is a shout out to get you to cast an editorial eye towards the recent edits to Ballia - you helped once before on that page when a SPA IP was inserting copyrighted stuff, now there's a lot of edits adding lists of 'notable persons'. Anniepoo (talk) 02:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And there's been another one in the 24 hours since then Anniepoo (talk) 23:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays[edit]

Middletown[edit]

Someone disagreed with your assessment. I agree with you. See: this. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:20, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P:NYCD DYKs[edit]

Please consider adding some of your DYKs (or new ones) as suggestions for the DYK section of Portal:Capital District. We need a bunch. Thanks! upstateNYer 15:55, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi there,

The logo shown on the Ally Financial page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ally_Financial is actually for Ally Bank. There is a (very slight) variation for Ally Financial (the "a" is purple and the "lly" is black - for the bank, the entire word is purple). The correct logo can be found on the media site: http://media.ally.com/index.php?s=13&cat=7.

Thanks - and let me know if you have any questions! Beth.coggins (talk) 18:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for Wikipedia Ambassadors[edit]

Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you are listed as a Wikipedian associated with Harvard. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at schools in Boston and Cambridge (including Harvard), which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

If you live near Boston and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from the area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.

If you're an experienced and active Wikipedian, you might be interested alternatively in becoming an Online Ambassador. The role of Online Ambassadors is to serve as mentors for students; it doesn't require any in-person outreach. Take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 21:24, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States[edit]

Hello, Austin512! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 02:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Ballia[edit]

Howdy. You were helpful in July 2009 dealing with inclusion of large blocks of copyrighted material in Ballia. Same or similar editor has returned. An editorial eye might be good. Anniepoo (talk) 18:12, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obamacare listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Obamacare. Since you had some involvement with the Obamacare redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Six Sided Pun Vows (talk | contribs | former account) 01:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Old Zadock Pratt.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]