User talk:Australiana
A Grade[edit]
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article A Grade, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Bfigura (talk) 05:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of The Opinion Show[edit]
A tag has been placed on The Opinion Show, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 03:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Nominating "The Handshake" for deletion[edit]
Hi, as you are the creator of the article, I am informing you that I have nominated The Handshake for deletion. Not because there is anything wrong with the article, but because it got assimilated into the Mark Latham and Australian federal election, 2004 articles. Peter Ballard (talk) 09:13, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
February 2009[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Australia. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 00:08, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Commonwealth Star and Crux.jpg[edit]
Nice work. I have a request: Could modify the image for me, as a new image file? The changes are making the commonwealth star yellow (the yellow of the sun in the Australian Aboriginal flag; and a canton, horizontal bi-color, of Red (top) and Green. I'f you can't, that's OK too. I'm not intending to add the image to any article, but I would like to use it in a user box. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 12:15, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Australian landmarks for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Australian landmarks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian landmarks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Moondyne (talk) 04:34, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia trainers requested in New South Wales[edit]
Wikimedia Australia is looking for experienced Wikipedians to help out at training sessions across New South Wales, in particular in Newcastle, Wollongong, Port Macquarie and in Parkes. If you're interested, the details are at the following link:
We'd love to see you there! Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:12, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Commonwealth Star and Crux.jpg listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Commonwealth Star and Crux.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Fair Use in Australia discussion[edit]
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery
"A Grade" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
The redirect A Grade has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 8 § A Grade until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
The file File:Ausflag2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-photographs shouldn't be in JPG. Redundant to File:Ausflag2.png.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:31, 25 December 2023 (UTC)