User talk:Authorashishkaul

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Authorashishkaul, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Didda, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 08:23, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Didda spamming[edit]

This stuff seems clear self-promotion to me. Please do not do it. If the book is reliable and useful to any Wikipedia articles, someone else will pick up on it in due course. However, since you mention that the author is a "media professional", it seems highly unlikely to be reliable for matters relating to history. - Sitush (talk) 08:24, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE DONT MAKE SUCH REMARKS WITHOUT KNOWING, READING AND UNDERSTANDINGTHE CREDENTIALS OF THE SUBJECT OR AUTHOR (WHO HAS BESTSELLERS ON KASHMIR HISTORY TO HIS CREDIT, AND ALSO A MAJOR HISTORICALRESEARCH DOCUMENTRY ENCOMPASSING 10,000 YEARS OF KASHMIR HISTORY); ESPECIALLY WHEN THE AUTHOR IS FROM THE LINEAGE. URGE U NOT TO USE WORDS LIKE ' HIGHLY UNLIKELY" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Authorashishkaul (talk • contribs) 18:13, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Authorashishkaul, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Authorashishkaul! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:37, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

How can adding historical notes of a historical figure mentioned in a bestseller book listed as NON FICTION HISTORICAL be called promotion ? . By the same yardstick every other book that yiu mentioned in dudda is promotion, is it not ? . I didnt mention another fact that i am a decendant of the same family from my maternal side and you wabt yo use others infotmation which is absolutely doctored and misinterpretation but yiu have an issue with my notes . This is quite strange. Now same thing is happening with another bestseller book Refugee Camp that deals with the intricate issue of refuggees from kashmir. You have a problem with that also ? Authorashishkaul (talk) 21:45, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article is meant to be about Didda, not about a book about Didda, let alone its author. —Tamfang (talk) 02:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes[edit]

You clearly do not seem to understand the diffrence between quoting from a book categorised as Historical and NON Fiction and humbug published about Didda. Authorashishkaul (talk) 21:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, there is a huge difference between an academic textbook being carefully and correctly cited in an article in this encyclopaedia, and the type of self-promoting spam edits which you made to the page on Didda. It matters not how well-researched your book is - it was your failure to appreciate that we maintain neutral standards over both content and appearance which resulted in your edits being reverted, and warnings given. I say this to you as the author of an academic/scientific work myself, and I am always extraordinarily careful and restrained in how I cite it so as not to be appearing to be promoting it, or myself, in any way here. Do please read WP:COI and WP:REFBEGIN. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 23:25, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

I regret to know that all this time you didnt even realise that the discussion and information is about Didda not about a book or author. I guess you are not willing to accept that someone else could know about Didda.

Let it be. Authorashishkaul (talk) 04:15, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure who you are addressing. Starting a new topic is an odd way to communicate. My own point, made above, is that you could be the world's expert on any given topic, but making the edits in the way you did was entirely inappropriate. Nick Moyes (talk) 05:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Authorashishkaul! You created a thread called Didda the Queen of kashmir at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]