User talk:Aydin mirza

November 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Azokh, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. AntonSamuel (talk) 16:36, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Ok. so, I will leave message in your page. --Aydin mirza (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

April 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, sorry, I've already sent in Talk page, but a little bit late. pls, see it. I do it according to the rules also, it's theory, suggestion, maybe. Acceptable from some of scholars, isn't it? this the rule of the project, if there any suggestion (not acceptable yet by offial science, in Encyclopedies, for example), it should be done as suggeetion. If you accept this position, pls, back this addition.--Aydin mirza (talk) 22:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Jr8825 • Talk 01:32, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Azykh. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Telling other users to "take it to the talk page" is not a blanket response you can utilize to justify your edits. If you wish to make controversial additions/edits, you will have to justify these though open and civil discussion. AntonSamuel (talk) 01:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello. You appear to have been repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Shusha. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Please note that edit warring is not acceptable in any amount, as it is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made. Thank you. Jr8825 • Talk 01:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 05:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Warning

Aydin mirza, please avoid terming your content opponents' responses as a farce. If you reach an impasse at an article talk page, there are dispute resolution requests that you may avail yourself of (like Third opinion or a Request for comment). But, if you withdraw from the discussion, you effectively forfeit your position, meaning that further reverts will be deemed disruptive. Thanks in advance for your close attention to this matter. El_C 13:49, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

hello, User:El_C|El_C. Thank you for your assistance. I'll consider your advices. Regards. Aydin Mirza

September 2021

Your recent editing history at Azykh Cave shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 17:34, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Shushi. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 16:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

ZaniGiovanni, you call the city Shusha in all your comments Shushi, despite this article is Shusha. So, let me remind "Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of Wikipedia:Consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large". Considering this all, it's very strange to talk about neutral point of view from your side. In any case, as you note, my applying is allowed, so, I respect Wikipedia's principles. Thank you for your attention. --Aydin mirza (talk) 18:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Aydin mirza. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Lightbluerain❄ (Talk. (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your thread has been archived

Hi Aydin mirza! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, History section in the article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 5 November 2021 (UTC)