User talk:Ayeletshacar

Ayeletshacar, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Ayeletshacar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:20, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Wikipedia[edit]

Hello, Ayeletshacar , and Welcome to Wikipedia!

If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — w.carter-Talk 16:26, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

How to alert other editors[edit]

Hi, it's me from the Teahouse again. :) I'm glad that we could help you with your questions. The Wikipedia can be a very confusing place when you are new here. So, first of all, let me reassure you that even if it may feel like everyone or everything is out to get you, that is not the case. On the contrary, you are now what we call a "newbie" and the rule is "Don't bite the newbies!", you just need time to adjust to things around here. And if there is anything you want to ask about, there is me, the Teahouse and hundreds of other older editors here to help you. We all know what it was like when we were new. :) Here is a little guide on how to contact others, and I also suggest you visit and read the pages in the "big blue block post" I put here on your page, and get to know a bit more about editing here. The guide:

When someone is posting on your talk page you get an automatic notification. That notification is a red square followed by a long yellow box (for most browsers and settings). In all other cases you have to alert the other editor in some way, either by "ping" or by mentioning them in a link. This will result in a just the red box notification on that users pages. So even if you respond on your talk page you still have to alert the editor you are addressing. If you want to get hold of me you write {{ping|W.carter}} resulting in @W.carter: or [[User:W.carter|W.carter]] resulting in W.carter and sign with the four "squiggles" ~~~~ at the end and hit "Save". There are some more, but these are the basics. And when you ask something on someone's talk page, you also create a new section so your question don't get entangled in some other conversation. If you are having a conversation with another user on some page, it is also customary to add that page to your Watchlist in case someone in the discussion forgets to alert.

The policy is to leave an answer on the same page as the question, keep the conversation intact unless there is some reason for moving it elsewhere. Like complicated questions at the Teahouse can be continued on the appropriate talk page.

All the best, w.carter-Talk 16:35, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 9[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 9, November-December 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

New donations, including real-paper-and-everything books, e-books, science journal databases, and more
New TWL coordinators, conference news, a new open-access journal database, summary of library-related WMF grants, and more
Spotlight: "Global Impact: The Wikipedia Library and Persian Wikipedia" - a Persian Wikipedia editor talks about their experiences with database access in Iran, writing on the Persian project and the JSTOR partnership

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kabbala[edit]

Greetings! Do you have an access to the source: "Jacobs, L. 1995. The Jewish religion: a companion"? I was wondering if you could provide a full quotation for the following passage at Kabbala:

Outside of Yemen, rationalists holding similar views aligned with the rationalism of Dor Daim describe themselves as "talmide ha-Rambam" (disciples of Maimonides) rather than Dor Daim, and are more theologically aligned with the rationalism of Modern Orthodox Judaism than with Orthodox Ḥasidic or Ḥaredi communities.

So far, the quotation only says: "... known that the Haskalah literature in Hebrew had an influence on the far-flung Jewish community of the Yemen. ... The Dardaim rejected the predominance of the Kabbalah and encouraged secular studies, even establishing a modern ..." As such, it doesn't really verify the passage however.

I tried to find that source through Google, Google Scholar, and my University database, but with no luck though. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 16:42, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I noticed you added three sources to the section mentioned above[1]. I took a quick look and made a few remarks about the sources:

1) Talmid ha-Rambam Commitment to Reality: The source is translated into German. It's also unclear, which part of the text does it verify. Therefore, could you please provide a quotation from the source, accompanied by an English translation. Remember that according to WP:NONENG, also self made translation will do. I assume that you know either German or Hebrew as you quoted the source, right?
2) [judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/52577/is-one-allowed-to-become-a-talmid-harambam Is one allowed to become a Talmid HaRambam?]: What part of the text does this source verify exactly? The only part that I was able to verify, is that there is a group of people who "...call themselves Talmidei HaRambam." It does not verify, however, what's been stated in the very sentence earlier (...rationalists holding similar views aligned with the rationalism of Dor Daim describe themselves as "talmide ha-Rambam"")
3) Resources for the Budding Talmid of the RaMBaM: This is just a list of different websites, and therefore cannot be used as a source.

Therefore, could you just please provide the quotations necessary to the footnotes that'd verify the very text in question at the article? Thanks! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 16:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Response[edit]

The second paragraph you added in Kabbalah#Orthodox_Judaism contains a lot of opinion and, regardless, probably isn't relevant to the Kabbalah entry per se. Unless you have serious references coming up, I suggest that it be deleted (or moved to a different article). Firstly you characterize his edition of Sefer Yetzira as a Kabbalistic work, but is Saadiah's text indeed so, or did you inadvertently transpose a Kabbalistic nature of other editions to this one? (Did you take a look at Kafih's edition in particular?) Furthermore, you mention "talmide ha-Rambam" who, aside from not significantly being written about outside of Wikipedia (to my knowledge), are - as you wrote - "are more theologically aligned with the rationalism of Modern Orthodox Judaism" - this isn't germane to the Kabballah entry. Do all "rationalistic" schools actually reject Kabbalah, or do some simply not focus on it or really care about it?

As to the first paragraph, attempts to improve Wikipedia are always appreciated but you made some blatant errors. Firstly, "He authored several critiques of mysticism in general" - can you name more than three? Secondly, Emunat Hashem was not at all published by him. Thirdly - and I'm just asking - are you sure that he wrote Milhamot Hashem "against what he perceived as neo-platonic and gnostic influences on Judaism" -- this seems very specific and unless you're really familiar with his work you might want to be more general (the Wikientry originally read "against what he perceived as the false teachings of the Zohar and the false Kabbalah of Isaac Luria"). And lastly, you wrote that he "founded yeshivot, rabbinical schools, and synagogues" - but I don't think this is correct... I hope this is helpful! Contributor613 (talk) 17:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Contributor613, we have discussed this on a couple of forums already[2][3]. According to WP:NONENG,

Citations to non-English sources are allowed. However, because this is the English-language Wikipedia, English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones whenever English sources of equal quality and relevance are available

Therefore, I restored the English source. If you want to use a non-English source, please do provide a quotation accompanied by a translation. If you don't do that, any material challenged may be removed WP:VERIFY. Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jayaguru-Shishya, 1) WP:NORUSH! Don't be so quick to delete (especially for mere lack of translation in a footnote when the English does appears in the main article that the footnote is on). 2) If you look you'll see that the Hebrew is now accompanied with translation. Contributor613 (talk) 18:14, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Contributor613. I am in no rush. The {{fv}} had been in the article for one month already before you started to remove it over and over again. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 18:16, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

== Jayagurugi, I may have been in a rush, wanting to get the whole section done in one edit that grew... Ayeletshacar (talk) 02:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

== Contributor 613,

>You said "The second paragraph you added in Kabbalah#Orthodox_Judaism contains a lot of opinion.

Not knowing exactly to what your referring here are some answers to the direct questions:

>Firstly, "He authored several critiques of mysticism in general" - can you name more than three?

I could but I don't want to because that isn't the point. All the text books and sermons for his yeshivot and synagogues, every time he opened his mouth in public he critiqued mysticism in general. The mission of his teachings was to combat what he and his later followers considered superstition and lack of scientific preciseness introduced by medieval Kabbalah and folk beliefs. Here is the list http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/381499

http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/381499 is nothing original; it's literally a copy of the Wikipedia article (some past version of it) and it's explicitly marked as being from Wikipedia. Wikipedia articles are not sources for Wikipedia articles (WP:CIRCULAR). Contributor613 (talk) 07:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

613, Are you saying he did not critique mysticism or that he didn't write anything? *

He sure did critique mysticism. He wrote מלחמות השם, plus דעת אלקים (reproduced [from a low-quality copy] in volume 3 of the Hebrew "יהודי תימן: היסטוריה, חברה, תרבות"). Although relatively short, he also wrote עמל ורעות רוח וחרמות ותשובתם. You wrote that you could name more than three.-Can you please let me know what other critiques of mysticism authored by him you know of? Contributor613 (talk) 07:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

>Secondly, Emunat Hashem was not at all published by him."

It was his views and public statements published by 3 sponsors who cataloged all of the views on the issue of the Zohar and mysticism according to this source: A Spark of Enlightenment Among the Jews of Yemen, Amram Gamliel, In: Hebrew Studies Vol. 25, (1984), pp. 82-89 Published by: National Association of Professors of Hebrew (NAPH) Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27908885. Download it for free if you sign up.

It is organized a bit in the spirit of the Talmud in that it includes all arguments, quotes him from speeches about the Zohar and his strong denouncements of "ignorant superstitions." It also quotes his opponents and they call each other names. That did seem out of the scope here.

I'm not clear on what you're trying to say here, perhaps you can restate it? If you read Emunat Hashem you'll see that it contains excerpts from Milhamot Hashem, following them with attacks (be it against the content or the author...). The same way that a book review which contains excerpts from the book being reviewed would not be said to be written by the book's author, Emunat Hashem was not at all written by Qafeh. By the way, I've read Gamliel's article a few months ago and was surprised to see the author express extreme relativism, commenting that the difference of opinion by both groups demonstrates that neither knew nor understood the subject matter with which they dealt (p. 89). Contributor613 (talk) 07:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

> Thirdly - and I'm just asking - are you sure that he wrote Milhamot Hashem "against what he perceived as neo-platonic and gnostic influences on Judaism" ...the Wikientry originally read "against what he perceived as the false teachings of the Zohar and the false Kabbalah of Isaac Luria".

Yes, that is what I read as a stated objection by another author. That's not a bad sentence. But, thinking about it, he did object to the ideas themselves as "so objectionable you wouldn't want to pronounce even in the lavatory." http://www.jstor.org/stable/27908885 page 83. The next paragraph in the Wiki article emphasizes a more clinical objection, the possible forgery aspect of the Zohar, so there must be some recognition of what he considered false ideas. Probably the term "neo-platonic" can go, since he himself was likely influenced by Rambam's neo-platonic ideas. The question is whether or not he knew what gnosticism was, since that is the name of the false influence on the Lurianic Kabbalah (as well as what is called "Christian Cabala"). Yes, he would have wanted us to be more precise than just "false".

<And lastly, you wrote that he "founded yeshivot, rabbinical schools, and synagogues" - but I <don't think this is correct.

I'm going by what is written here: http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/381499, and he talks about his schools and the children with considerable passion here: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27908885 page 83. It is also a reasonable deduction since dynasties such as this one do start schools. I know he started two at least, which is in the Wiki article on him specifically. The first reference says he established 'networks' probably referring to the synagogue with the schools. The number of yeshivot he started isn't really the point is it? He did have an effect on a large stream of Modern Jewish Orthodoxy today through the schools and his written and oral works.

As noted above http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/381499 is not a valid source as it's merely a copy of the Wikipedia Dor Daim article. See WP:CIRCULAR. Also, you wrote that "he talks about his schools" on page 83, but that is false; no more than one school is mentioned. Although numbers aren't the main point, as Wikipedia editors we can't edit based on unsupported assumptions. Although I don't recall a source that he tried opening more than one school, you're welcome to cite if you found. Contributor613 (talk) 07:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So there is the justification of the copy edits and references I made. An underlying assumption of my comments and references is that Rav Yiḥyah ibn Shalomo el Qafiḥ was the leader of the Dor Daim movement. So what was added was based on that premise. In order to make a logical flow when one paragraph did not always lead into the others, I tried to connect the dots based on the evidence provided as best I could. Ayeletshacar (talk) 02:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just noting that although I happened to see your addition to this thread, that might not have happened. Even if you ping someone to get their attention there's no guarantee when they'll be on Wikipedia, all the more so if you just enter a username as plain text. Contributor613 (talk) 07:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 10[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 10, January-February 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

New donations - ProjectMUSE, Dynamed, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and Women Writers Online
New TWL coordinator, conference news, and a new guide and template for archivists
TWL moves into the new Community Engagement department at the WMF, quarterly review

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A new reference tool[edit]

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 11[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 11, March-April 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

New donations - MIT Press Journals, Sage Stats, Hein Online and more
New TWL coordinators, conference news, and new reference projects
Spotlight: Two metadata librarians talk about how library professionals can work with Wikipedia

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you![edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:

Account coordinators help distribute research accounts to editors.
Partner coordinators seek donations from new partners.
Outreach coordinators reach out to the community through blog posts, social media, and newsletters or notifications.
Technical coordinators advise on building tools to support the library's work.

Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 12[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

New donations - Taylor & Francis, Science, and three new French-language resources
Expansion into new languages, including French, Finnish, Turkish, and Farsi
Spotlight: New partners for the Visiting Scholar program
American Library Association Annual meeting in San Francisco

Read the full newsletter

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 13[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 13, August-September 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

New donations - EBSCO, IMF, more newspaper archives, and Arabic resources
Expansion into new languages, including Viet and Catalan
Spotlight: Elsevier partnership garners controversy, dialogue
Conferences: PKP, IFLA, upcoming events

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 14[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 14, October-November 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

New donations - Gale, Brill, plus Finnish and Farsi resources
Open Access Week recap, and DOIs, Wikipedia, and scholarly citations
Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref - a citation drive for librarians

Read the full newsletter

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 15[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 15, December-January 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)

New donations - Ships, medical resources, plus Arabic and Farsi resources
#1lib1ref campaign summary and highlights
New branches and coordinators

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 16[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 16, February-March 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)

New donations - science, humanities, and video resources
Using hashtags in edit summaries - a great way to track a project
A new cite archive template, a new coordinator, plus conference and Visiting Scholar updates
Metrics for the Wikipedia Library's last three months

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 17[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
by The Interior, Ocaasi, UY Scuti, Sadads, and Nikkimaria

New donations this month - a German-language legal resource
Wikipedia referals to academic citations - news from CrossRef and WikiCite2016
New library stats, WikiCon news, a bot to reveal Open Access versions of citations, and more!

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 18[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 18, June–July 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi, Samwalton9, UY Scuti, and Sadads

New donations - Edinburgh University Press, American Psychological Association, Nomos (a German-language database), and more!
Spotlight: GLAM and Wikidata
TWL attends and presents at International Federation of Library Associations conference, meets with Association of Research Libraries
OCLC wins grant to train librarians on Wikimedia contribution

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 19[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 19, September–October 2016
by Nikkimaria, Sadads and UY Scuti

New and expanded donations - Foreign Affairs, Open Edition, and many more
New Library Card Platform and Conference news
Spotlight: Fixing one million broken links

Read the full newsletter

19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 20[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs)

Partner resource expansions
New search tool for finding TWL resources
#1lib1ref 2017
Wikidata Visiting Scholar

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 21[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 21, January-March 2017
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

#1lib1ref 2017
Wikipedia Library User Group
Wikipedia + Libraries at Wikimedia Conference 2017
Spotlight: Library Card Platform

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 22[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 22, April-May 2017

New and expanded research accounts
Global branches update
Spotlight: OCLC Partnership
Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 23[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017

Library card
User Group update
Global branches update
Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
Bytes in brief

Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 24[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017

User Group update
Global branches update
- Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
Bytes in brief

Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Ayeletshacar, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Welcome to the Wikipedia[edit]

How to alert other editors[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 9[edit]

Kabbala[edit]

Response[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 10[edit]

A new reference tool[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 11[edit]

The Wikipedia Library needs you![edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 12[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 13[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 14[edit]

Books & Bytes - Issue 15[edit]

Books & Bytes - Issue 16[edit]

Books & Bytes - Issue 17[edit]

Books & Bytes - Issue 18[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 19[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 20[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 21[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 22[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 23[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 24[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 25[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 26[edit]

Books & Bytes - Issue 27[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 28[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 29[edit]

Books & Bytes, Issue 30[edit]

Books & Bytes, Issue 31[edit]

Books & Bytes, Issue 32[edit]

Books & Bytes, Issue 33[edit]

Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 36[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 37[edit]

Issue 38, January – April 2020[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 40[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 41[edit]

Books & Bytes - Issue 42[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 42[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 43[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 45[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 46[edit]

Books & Bytes – Issue 47[edit]