User talk:Azeroo
I have added Photo Gallery link to celebrities websites, I know wikipedia is not collection of links, I gave link to users to see images of celebrity.
Azeroo.com is non-profit website and do not have any commercial benefit from website like wikipedia.
You can see other photo gallery links for other celebrities in Website.
I will be happy if you give me oppurtinity to help wikipedia, and make contributions ın section of making photo gallery of celebrities.
For this reason everyday I collect 10,000 of celebrity pictures
Thank you very much
- You are not permitted to link to sites you run. Additionally, image gallery sites are inappropriate regardless, not least because of the copyright violations. --Yamla 16:57, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. --Yamla 16:57, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Reason I put photo gallery links is to make contribution, I could make another username and show you that is not my site, but I did this way that you should know that I did it. I do not have any commerial benefit, and I do not try promote my site.
I talked with user Onorem and he said : "If you feel the links are appropriate, please bring it up on each articles talk page. When an editor starts putting multiple links to the same site on several articles without adding anything to the articles themselves, it looks like spam. For quicker responses from me, first try to leave a message on my talk page. I don't always notice when I get mail at this address. "
So I put links again.I did not like you warn that I making spam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azeroo (talk • contribs)
- Okay, just to be clear: You are not permitted to link to a site that you run. You are not permitted to link to image galleries. Both are in violation of WP:SPAM and WP:EL. However, if you wish to add a link to a site you run that is not an image gallery, you may mention the link on an article's discussion page. If the consensus of the other editors is that the link is appropriate, one of them may add the link. --Yamla 17:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
While browsing I realized there are several spam links in other articles, that site of big companies.What is problem? Are small sites prohibited?
Image tagging for Image:Melisa.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Melisa.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Didem Erol, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1817188. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Didem Erol[edit]
A tag has been placed on Didem Erol requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Skomorokh incite 21:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
The file File:Nizami Gencevi.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)