User talk:BGerasimov

Ways to improve Anti-Trafficking Review[edit]

Hi, I'm Robertgombos. BGerasimov, thanks for creating Anti-Trafficking Review!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I've moved your article in the Draftspace because it has enough potential (notability) to be eligible for the mainspace (article space) but first you have to reference your article. Try using Google search, news, mentions in books, journals, newspapers. If you need any help and I'm familiar with the topic (or I understand the language) let me know.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Robert G. (talk) 14:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Trafficking Review moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Anti-Trafficking Review, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Robert G. (talk) 14:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anti-Trafficking Review (September 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Domdeparis was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NJOURNAL there are no secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anti-Trafficking Review and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Domdeparis (talk) 09:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! BGerasimov, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Domdeparis (talk) 09:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anti-Trafficking Review (September 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anti-Trafficking Review and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:55, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Anti-Trafficking Review concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anti-Trafficking Review, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anti-Trafficking Review[edit]

Hello, BGerasimov. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anti-Trafficking Review".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:34, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits[edit]

Hi, BGerasimov. Edits like this are not WP:Minor edits. Also see WP:SCHOLARSHIP for appropriate sources to use in articles like Sex trafficking. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:34, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology[edit]

BGerasimov, regarding this and this, do not change "sex trafficking" to "human trafficking" when the content is about the former. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:43, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be clearer, what I mean is that "human trafficking" is the broader term. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]