User talk:BOBLO1356

It is suspected that this user has used one or more accounts abusively.
The abuse of multiple accounts is prohibited; using new accounts to evade blocks or bans results in the block or ban being extended.
See block log and lists of suspected and confirmed accounts.

February 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to L. Ron Hubbard, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: L. Ron Hubbard was changed by BOBLO1356 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-20T17:43:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to L. Ron Hubbard, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dekisugi (talk) 17:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to David Gaiman, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ReverendG (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Andreas Heldal-Lund, you will be blocked from editing. Dekisugi (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 18:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BOBLO1356 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I DID NOT VANDALISE AFTER MY FINAL WARNING!

Decline reason:

So, your reason for being unblocked is that you should be able to vandalise Wikipedia multiple times provided you don't get a final warning? And that once you have received the final warning, edits like this somehow improve the Wikipedia? No. — Yamla (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

below.

This is so unfair i did not vandalise after my final warning i dare you to find the evidence!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BOBLO1356 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The link you sent me has no vandlism and i followed the rules or do you bend them like the scientolgiest you are. So i ask you if a man follows the rules he gets punshied!

Go on son get him told —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.219.75 (talk) 18:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't get to vandalise a minimum number of times. It was clear from the entire edit history of this account, including these two unblock requests, that your only purpose is to disrupt Wikipedia. I will presently be protecting this talk page to prevent further disruption — Jayron32.talk.contribs 19:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.