User talk:Barbara.steinberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Barbara.steinberg, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Barbara.steinberg! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Symphony of the New World[edit]

Hi Barbara, sorry that I and the IRC channel were very busy earlier, I'm happy to help you with your article now. There's a couple of things to mention here;

  • Referencing - This link is very helpful in learning how to reference, which can be a bit overwhelming at first! I assume you were trying to source the fact that the first time it was played was in 1965. To do that, you would actually just cite the program as if it were a book, using the Cite Book option shown in the video on the page I linked. Sources don't need to be available online, so that would be fine, even without the image!
  • Images - You've uploaded an image of the program, and though we don't need to use it as a reference, it would probably go nicely in the article! See the link here for guidance on how to include that image into the article.
  • sources - To get your article accepted you're going to need to add some third party reliable sources. This is to prove that the subject is notable and worthy of an encyclopedia entry, and also to prove that its content is true. Take a look at this link to see what sort of things are suitable for this. I've found some sources you could use; this article mentions the ensemble with some information on what it was, there is a mention here, and these books mention it also.

If you need any more help feel free to reply here, I'll keep it on my watchlist :) Samwalton9 (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Newspaper references[edit]

And there may be more; I didn't add any names to my search. Yngvadottir (talk) 13:32, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Barbara.steinberg, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Yngvadottir Yngvadottir (talk) 13:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Symphony of the New World (June 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
LukeSurl t c 14:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, Barbara: don't worry, the speedy deletion was declined since it was supposedly copyvio of your own blog entry! It's again been submitted for evaluation. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:32, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Symphony of the New World (June 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Thanks, Lixxx235Got a complaint? 02:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Barbara, in response to your message: you're getting confused by the citation templates, yes. But that can be sorted out, it's just fiddly stuff. The comment about tone refers to things like your mention of "my father" and the fact it is a bit long and rambling. I see you've been working on things. Don't get discouraged. I suggest dividing it up into sections: an introductory paragraph followed by a section called Founding, a section on the performance seasons (not sure what I would head this, maybe the years? or different conductors' names if the orchestra changed conductor?) and then a section called Dissolution or End of the orchestra. (You could add a section called Legacy if you have at least one good source spelling out how the orchestra's having existed changed things.) In the introduction, mention that it was the first fully integrated orchestra in the United States. Then in each subsection, tell the facts first and have the quotations following those. That will make it more obviously structured. Note that it was failed for tone/structure, not because the references need soirting out, and not for being not obviously notable. So you're doing the right thing rewriting the text. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi (found this from Yngvadottir's page). I'd love to have a go at editing the page- is that okay? Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 15:21, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Barbara, you're very welcome. Xanthomelanoussprog has divided it into sections and done some copyediting. Yngvadottir (talk) 03:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Barbara- thanks for your very kind words. I hope to do some more later on today- I'd like to reduce the amount of quoting if possible. 08:44, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Hi again! (On break at work.) I have it watchlisted and saw how much work you were doing, and yes, I think it's ready to be resubmitted, so I'm glad you did. I had also had a problem with the image references, but I'm not sure it's exactly what you think - my problem is that I click on the link to the New York Times article and I just get an endlessly whirring New York Times "T". I suspect either you got the URL wrong or one needs to be a subscriber to see it. The reference is actually to the article, and references don't have to be online. Here is what I would write in the reference:
Joan Peyser, "The Negro in Search of an Orchestra", ''[[The New York Times]]'', November 26, 1967, [http://symphonyofthenewworld.com/category/new-york-times/ page image online by permission] at Symphonyoftheworld.com.
The article also appears to be in the following book:
Joan Peyser, ''The Music of My Time'', Something about the music 1, White Plains, New York: Pro/AM Music Resources / London: Kahn & Averill, 1995, ISBN 9780912483993.
--Google Books shows me it exists and then rejects its own URL. I have coded both of those so that if you choose you can just copy and paste them, wiki-code all ready. And remember those newspaper links up above - they also document the significance of the orchestra, as well as a few dates, names, and fundraising specifics. (And they're acceptable just like the New York Times.) Yngvadottir (talk) 12:21, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Responding again :-) If you have two of the yellow pending review templates, don't worry, they have a bot that cleans up things like that. (In fact I removed it from my talk page to spare the poor bot from having a conniption.) Also try not to worry about reference formatting - that can be fixed, and yes it is confusing. (I personally prefer not to use the citation templates because it takes me twice as long to remember what the fields are called and type the stuff in as it does to ... just type the stuff in. But I have long experience writing research papers, so I'm used to creating footnotes.) The NYT article is the actual citation, which is why I suggested also mentioning that it appears in the book. The blog image is just a convenience to the reader who doesn't have access to the original, so in that instance I see nothing wrong with linking to the blog - but you need to give full information on the article. Anyway, I will try to look at the draft myself and see how I can help; remember, it usually takes a while for them to be reviewed; but the two of you have done the heavy lifting, so I would say there's a good chance it will get passed this time anyway. And remember there are lots of editors; most of my articles have had help of various kinds from a whole bunch of people. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmmm one point. You say you uploaded the image of the flyer at Commons - but the Times gave the orchestra permission to use the image on the flyer, they didn't surrender rights to it completely, so it's not legal to have on Commons (which requires images to be freely reusable for any purpose, including commercial, and images derived from someone else's property don't qualify because the creator of the derivative image doesn't have the right to grant that), and it probably isn't allowable on en.wikipedia as "fair use" either (Commons doesn't host "fair use" images), because the article does not discuss the Times article or the appearance of that page. So someone is probably going to propose it for deletion on Commons. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:29, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Barbara. No, you haven't lost my favor - haven't been near a computer all day (temperature managed to get over 20 degrees and it hasn't rained!) Good luck with the submission. Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 20:05, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Barbara, we can carry on improving it. I'll have to look tonight or tomorrow, however; offline commitments (and a very peculiar schedule). And as you can see from my edit history, I get around ... But try not to worry, I really think this is notable enough and may pass this time; if not, we'll try again. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Barbara- congratulations!!! Thanks for the flowers, balloons- I only played a small part in the big push! Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 20:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Symphony of the New World was accepted[edit]

Symphony of the New World, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks also to Xanthomelanoussprog and Yngvadottir for their useful and helpful feedback in improving this article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you don't mind the changes....[edit]

As you see, I finally had time to do some work on the article, including putting in more press references. (There may well be material in Google Books too; I have yet to look.) If you see anyone else mentioned in the article who has a Wikipedia article but hasn't been linked, please add the link! I was happy to see we had articles on a number of people. But there's one glaring exception - your father. I can't read the New York Times obituary because I've apparently already exceeded my allotment for the month; I'm hoping to be able to see the full text in July. I also found a very short Associated Press biography. Those strongly suggest he's notable. Do you know of any other sources on him - is there anything in Variety for example? Yngvadottir (talk) 17:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Photograph of premiere concert of the Symphony of the New World at Carnegie Hall.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Photograph of premiere concert of the Symphony of the New World at Carnegie Hall.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked user request[edit]

Barbara, please make an edit on this Talk page, so that you can be exempted from the IP block affecting your ability to edit. Or, you can submit your unblock request at- WP:UTRS.  JGHowes  talk 15:24, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Barbara.steinberg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

glitch with the system having to do with "IPv6 addresses"

Accept reason:

The block that was preventing you from editing has been removed. You should be able to edit now, but if not, please let us know. Sorry for the inconvenience. —DoRD (talk)​ 19:46, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your help. JGHowes and DoRD (Barbara.steinberg (talk) 20:49, 31 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Your Nomination[edit]

of JGHowes has ben awarded. Just thought you should know. ―Buster7 ☎ 01:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Barbara.steinberg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Barbara.steinberg&oldid=1187213192"