User talk:Barnoldswick1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Barnoldswick1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as West Craven Railway Station, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nthep (talk) 21:45, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of West Craven Railway Station[edit]

The article West Craven Railway Station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability. Not mentioned anywhere outside SELRAP's own needs assessment.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nthep (talk) 21:45, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of West Craven Railway Station for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article West Craven Railway Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Craven Railway Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nthep (talk) 22:03, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Transdev in Burnley & Pendle[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Transdev in Burnley & Pendle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:23, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mainline 28/29[edit]

Hello, Barnoldswick1. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mainline 28/29, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Salimfadhley (talk) 05:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mainline 28/29 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mainline 28/29 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mainline 28/29 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Charles (talk) 10:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Northern Railways[edit]

@RedRose64, other wikiprojects section of wikiproject Northern Railways completed now.

June 2016[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Transdev in Burnley & Pendle, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 08:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2014 FE72) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating 2014 FE72, Barnoldswick1!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add the appropriate stub tag to such short articles, I've done it for you here.

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Train Sim World for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Train Sim World is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Train Sim World until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The1337gamer (talk) 19:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pride of the Dales for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pride of the Dales is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pride of the Dales until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 16:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Train Sim World moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Train Sim World, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ^{Atsme📞📧} 02:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Train Sim World concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Train Sim World, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Train Sim World[edit]

Hello, Barnoldswick1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Train Sim World".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]