User talk:Basilica1

Image copyright problem with Image:Bas Ext 4.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bas Ext 4.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 18:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cardinal Keeler article[edit]

Thank you for your comment, Basilica1. Despite Cardinal Keeler's personal preferences (my great-uncle works in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith), the use of "Cardinal" before the surname is still the proper title. For instance, when a new pope is announced, the Cardinal Protodeacon says "Cardinal" before the surname. Don't mean to sound, well, mean. Tajm, 9 April 2007, 16:19 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:FPKeough.jpg[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:FPKeough.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:FPKeough.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:FPKeough.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:KeoughSeal.jpg[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:KeoughSeal.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:KeoughSeal.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:KeoughSeal.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:JamesGibbons.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:JamesGibbons.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:BayleySeal.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BayleySeal.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:MichaelCurley.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MichaelCurley.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:MartinSpalding.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MartinSpalding.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:39, 9 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Sunshine Man 17:39, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:BayleySeal.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BayleySeal.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cardinal Keeler image[edit]

Greetings, Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I am wondering about the source of Image:Keeler1.jpg which you recently uploaded with a GNU license. Such a license requires that you, yourself, are the photographer and copyright holder.

If this is a diocesan press kit photo, on the other hand, the diocese is the copyright holder and only they can freely license it. If the latter is the case, I'd be happy to advise the rather tedious steps to take, having gone through it myself. JGHowes ^talk - 21:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, then the Archdiocese of Baltimore as copyright holder needs to send a permission on their letterhead signed by an authorized official to OTRS. This also applies to Image:EdwinO'Brien.jpg, should you wish to re-upload it using this license. It was deleted as a non- Fair Use image.

See also WP:COPYREQ#When permission is confirmed JGHowes ^talk - 05:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YThe email address for OTRS is: permissions-en@wikimedia.org

Just email the following statement to the Wikimedia Communications Committee at that address, preferably as an email attachment on diocesan letterhead in .DOC format. It should sail right through.

On behalf of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Baltimore, we hereby assert that the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Baltimore is the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the image at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Keeler1.jpg

We agree to publish that work under the free license {{attribution|[[Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Baltimore}}.

We acknowledge that we grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs.

We are aware that the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Baltimore always retain copyright of this work, and retains the right to be attributed in accordance with this license. Modifications others may make to the work will not be attributed to us.

We are aware that this free license only concerns copyright of this image, and we reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.

We acknowledge that we cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the image may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

DATE__(signed)____,, Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Baltimore

JGHowes ^talk - 19:08, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Due to non-receipt of permission from the Archdiocese, the image Image:Keeler1.jpg is now tagged as follows, and is subject to deletion: JGHowes ^talk - 22:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

	This file is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy . Please share your thoughts on the matter at its entry on the Copyright problems/permission page.

Image source problem with Image:AOBSeal.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:AOBSeal.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:AOBSeal.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AOBSeal.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:EdwinO'Brien.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:EdwinO'Brien.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for Image:AOBSeal.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AOBSeal.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. OsamaK (talk) 19:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:FrancisKeough.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FrancisKeough.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 19:24, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:FrancisKeough.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:FrancisKeough.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --aktsu ^(t / c) 14:41, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:AmbroseMarechal.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AmbroseMarechal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Saibo (Δ) 04:01, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AOBSeal.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AOBSeal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:WilliamBorders.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:WilliamBorders.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bulwersator (talk) 17:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Baltobasilica.jpg[edit]

The file File:Baltobasilica.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MartinSpalding.jpg[edit]

The file File:MartinSpalding.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SamuelEccleston.jpg[edit]

The file File:SamuelEccleston.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploader claims to be the copyright holder, however this is unlikely as it appears to be a historical artwork. Further details should be provided on the source of the image and details of the original artwork to verify copyright status.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. matt br 11:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]