Hello, Battlensigns! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! LittleOldMe (talk) 13:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Given that APA might not pass the standard for inclusion in Wikipedia (the policy Wikipedia:Notability) I guess that sources on their influence will also be hard to come by. However, Wikipedia:No original research requires that these sources be used to justify any analysis. Do any of the Parliamentary reports criticise APA by name? I understand that these guys are ignored by the RAAF (and rightfully so, IMO, given their lack of understanding of modern airpower). --Nick Dowling (talk) 11:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
