User talk:Bbik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. To keep conversations together, I will respond here unless you request otherwise. You are welcome to do the same if I leave you a message.
Design stolen from Duja.


Welcome!

Hello, Bbik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  STTW (talk) 21:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit link sillyness[edit]

Hey there. WRT Ehecatl you can use {{FixBunching}} to fix the problem. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:25, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks, I knew there was a template for that somewhere, but with only two images and plenty of space (and reason!) to spread them out, it didn't seem worth the effort to find it. Thanks for the link! -Bbik 05:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment of Smederevo Fortress[edit]

As you are the chief contributor to the article, I wanted to be sure you were aware that Smederevo Fortress has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Malleus Fatuorum 17:34, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Manasija?[edit]

I've seen your great work at Smederevo. But, with the recent completion of the reconstruction of Manasija/Resava, why don't you dedicate yourself a bit to that? Practically almost the entire fotress has been reconstructed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.110.244.143 (talk) 01:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:AdelbodenfromOurChalet.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:29, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bob McQuillen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Golubac Fortress[edit]

Golubac Fortress has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 17:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]